Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 69 civil offences Court: allahabad Page 7 of about 1,494 results (0.238 seconds)

Dec 18 1961 (HC)

Chandi Prasad Pathak Vs. Sadanand Pathak and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1962All577

..... appreciation of the second point reference is necessary to the various provisions of the indian soldiers (litigation) act, 1925. according to clause (b) of section 2 of the act 'indian soldier' means a person subject to the army act or the air force act section 3 then defines two expressions 'under special conditions' and 'under war conditions'. the definitions read:'(a) ..... not mentioned in the application for execution that ram narain pathak was serving in the army. the second ground was that section 11 was really subject, to the provisions of section 6 and according to the latter section the benefit of this act could be claimed only if there was no other party to the suit having interest ..... in service till november, 1946. whatever may be the date of the termination of his services in the army he was certainly in the military employment for more than a year. under section 11 of the act the decree-holder is entitled to have this period of one year excluded from the three years period of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1993 (HC)

R.R. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1994CriLJ762

..... learned counsel for the respondent to the effect that the supreme court has absolutely ruled out the necessity for recording of reasons by court martial constituted under the army act in any situation whatsoever.10. learned counsel then placed reliance on the latter part of the observations of the supreme court in para 22 of the report in ..... for the union of india, has contended that article 14 of the constitution has no application to the orders of summary and general court martial convened under the army act. according to him, it is in the discretion of the court martial to award one punishment for the same offence to one and to award other punishment to ..... petition. by order dated 17th april, 1986 the petitioner was awarded the punishment to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months in civil jail and to be dismissed from, army service by a summary court martial whereas by order dated 25th november, 1986 the petitioner's petition filed on 10th july, 1986 against the order dated 17th april, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1954 (HC)

Mrs. Avril Ellen Smith Vs. Reginald Frank Smith

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All624

..... . vi c. 13) came into force. by section 17(1) of this act the jurisdiction of indian courts to pass decree for dissolution of marriage under the indian and colonial divorce jurisdiction act in petitions presented after the aforesaid date was completely taken away. the indian independence act was repealed on 26-1-1950, when the constitution came into force,12. if ..... the wife's domicile always follows that of her husband. the respondent came out to india about thirty years ago. he was formerly a warrant officer in the army but later on he gave up that service and took up employment with the railways. at the time of his marriage with the petitioner in ..... , reference may also be made to the indian matrimonial causes (war marriages) act (xl of 1948). although the respondent, was, at one time, a warrant officer in the army, this act does not apply to the present case because (1) the respondent had ceased to belong to the army before his marriage and (2) the marriage was not solemnised during the ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1992 (HC)

Km. Divya Chandra Vs. the Vice-chancellor, Roorkee University, Roorkee ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1992All298; (1992)2UPLBEC1435

..... of the alleged manipulation said to have been committed in preparing the result of the petitioner in the examination in question. section 11 of the act speaks of the powers of the vice-chancellor as also the conditions under which he can exercise emergency powers. the vice- ..... committee felt it necessary. the petitioner submits that the appointment of the saraf committee was arbitrary and irrational. it was done only to appease section of students, who were party to the dispute and to cause harassment to the petitioner.8. one of the members of the saraf committee, ..... in air 1987 sc 2386 the supreme court was dealing with a case arising out of the army act in respect of a delinquent, who was tried in summary court-martial. it was found that the officer who had punished the ..... army personnel on previous occasion was sitting at court-martial and the delinquent was not asked whether he objected to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1999 (HC)

Gulzar Singh S/O Genda Singh (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3900

..... constitutes a material improvement in the prosecution case.22. these facts were not present in the statement of the witnesses under section 161 cr.p.c. also, it has been stated in court with a view to make their presence and witnessing of ..... singh was his first cousin. he pleaded ignorance to the fact that his father had launched a criminal case under section 436/307 ipc against this bhupal singh and whether he was convicted in that case or not. he admitted that ..... arun kumar has pleaded ignorance to the fact that whether his father lodged any report under sections 504, 506 ipc against any person for extending threat. this act of the pw-1 is deliberate. this is unacceptable to us that if any threat ..... was extended to shiv raj singh or he was abused he would not have taken such action and this witness being his eldest son would not have any knowledge of the same as pleaded by him.14. the other litigation under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2010 (HC)

Dr. Jay Prakash Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... get into class-i service at the age of 40 or earlier and would thus not fall in any of the categories in schedule-2 with reference to section 3 (c) of the act of 1994. 24. a supplementary affidavit has been filed by dr. arun kumar singh on 19th july, 2010 annexing therewith office memorandum of the government ..... prakash, asstt. registrar, mahatma gandhi vidyapith varanasi, it is stated that the petitioner has alternative remedy of approaching the chancellor by way of reference under section 68 of the u.p. state universities act, 1973. he has taken part in the selection proceedings and had appeared in the interviews and thus he cannot challenge the selection proceedings. 5. in ..... office memorandum. the supreme court, however, found that the amendments made by the government of bihar in the reservation act of 1992 by ordinance of 1995 and schedule-ii read with section 3 (b) of the u.p. act no.94 were arbitrary and rejected them. it was made open to the two states to lay down fresh criteria .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2005 (HC)

Umesh Chandra Verma S/O Sri Ram Prakash Verma and ors. Vs. State of U. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : II(2005)DMC126

..... the prosecution opposite party no. 2 complainant arun kumar verma lodged fir against applicants and shyam verma under section 498a/307 ipc and section 3/4 dowry prohibition act on 6.4.2004. later on the death of priti verma daughter of arun kumar verma took place. after investigation the charge sheet ..... cr.pc was allowed and a direction was made to issue non-bailable warrant against the applicants to face trial under section 498a/304b ipc and section 4 of dowry prohibition act.4. it is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that in dying declaration smt. priti verma had stated that husband shyam verma had suspicion ..... verma, smt. laxmi verma, smt. mohini verma, rishi verma and chanchal verma have been summoned under section 319 cr.pc to face trial in sessions trial no. 455 of 2004 under section 498a/304b ipc and section 3/4 dowry prohibition act, police station bah, district agra. this sessions trial is already pending against shyam verma.3. according to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1931 (PC)

Pitam Lal and ors. Vs. Kalla Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1931All489; 136Ind.Cas.284

..... jurisdiction had granted probate of the will under which the right was claimed. but the language of section 244, succession act, though similar in some respects to that of section 62, probate and administration act, was not absolutely identical, as the latter section had the words allowing the annexing of 'a copy, draft or statement of the contents of the ..... as well as by soldiers, mariners and airmen, whose wills are not required to be in writing. the language of section 276 is almost identical with that of the old section 62, probate and administration act. it does not expressly refer to oral wills. it must be presumed that the legislature was aware of the trend of ..... if oral wills are not to be admitted to probate there would certainly be one serious difficulty in the way of soldiers, mariners and airmen. section 213 of the new act does not exempt them and lays down that their executor or legatee cannot establish the will without having obtained probate or letters of administration. if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 1928 (PC)

Misri Lal Vs. Gopi Charan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All538

..... only in such cases that are relevant for the purposes of the present appeal.47. before referring to them i would examine the provisions of the tenancy act, itself. section 167, act 2, 1901 consists of two parts. the first part directs thatall suits and applications of the nature specified in schedule 4 shall be heard and determined by ..... approved of by this court in birham khusal v. sumera [1913] 35 all. 299 at p 301;section 95, tenancy act, is hardly the section under which to proceed.31. as regards the second point: the appellant argued that it was sufficient for the plaintiffs to claim to be in possession ..... argument of the appellant on both points, for he argued (and my learned brother has accepted the argument on p. 3 of his judgment), that section 95, tenancy act, was the proper section under which to decide these questions such as legitimacy or the validity of a deed of relinquishment. the decision of the commissioner on this point was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1999 (HC)

Jogender Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(All)218

..... not at all attracted in the present case. similarly, mr. govind krishna, learned counsel for the respondents is not right in invoking s. 221 of the act. sec. 221 of the act, provides for levy of penalty when tax is in default. it is not the case of the respondent that any penalty upon the petitioner has been imposed or the ..... which relates to notice of demand specifically refers to tax, interest, penalty, fine or any other sum payable in consequence of any order passed under the act. likewise, various sections contained in chapter xxi of the act, which deals with penalties, provides for imposition of penalty in addition to any tax payable by the assessee. thus, according to him, tax and penalty ..... is liable to pay the said amount as the same has been imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the act, and the provision of s. 221 are fully attracted in the present case.11. sec. 2(43) of the act defines tax as follows :'2(43).'tax' in relation to the assessment year commencing on the lst day of april, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //