Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 59 offences relating to courts martial Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 490 results (0.499 seconds)

Oct 16 2024 (HC)

Buoyant Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd Vs. M/s Manyata Reallty

Court : Karnataka

..... duty nothing is left to discretion; it is a simple, definite duty. presentation of election petition to the high court within the meaning of section 81 of the act without anything more would mean delivery of election petition to the high court through one of its officers competent or authorized to receive the same on ..... by the appellant herein-boyount technology constellation pvt. ltd., it was stated that the petitioner was a partnership firm registered under the partnership act, 1932 and that the petition under section 95 of the code against it was not maintainable. 3.1 it was stated that the petitioner with other entities, all are engaged ..... duly elected in the elections held to the badarpur legislative assembly constituency of assam. the contesting respondent filed an election petition under sections 80/81 of the representation of the people act, to challenge the election of the appellant. the election petition was presented before the stamp reporter-cum-oath commissioner of the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2024 (HC)

Shri Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... public interest. wherefore, it is requested of your good office, to kindly grant sanction for the prosecution of sri.siddaramiah, for offences under section 7, section 9, section 11, section 12 and section 15 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and section 59, 61, 62, 201, 227, 228, 229, 239, 314, 316(5), 318(1), 318(2), 318(3), 319, ..... practices adopted by shri siddaramaiah, hon ble chief minister of karnataka concerning allotment of alternative sites by mysore urban development authority ( muda ) under various sections of pc, act, 1988 and bnss, 2023 has been perused.28. in view of the allegations and on prima facie perusal of the petitions for grant of sanction ..... communicates the order of the governor to the state on 17-08-2024. the decision is, according sanction against the petitioner/chief minister under section 17a of the pc act and section 218 of the bnss. the petitioner challenges the said order before this court.4. heard dr. abhishek manu singhvi along with prof. ravi varma .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (HC)

Sri Suresha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste, community or any other analogous grounds. clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153-aipc will apply only when an act is committed which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities and ..... of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever.18. the ingredients necessary for making out an offence under section 153-a(b) is the commission of any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which ..... no.5694 of 2024 petitioners were assaulted, but that is a separate crime which is being investigated into. however, the act of these petitioners in threatening the complainant or others would clearly attract section 153a of the ipc for the allegations that are made. he would, therefore, contend that it is a matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Smt. G K Akshata Vs. V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... the offence. the deeming provision makes its imperative to join partnership firm as party being principal offender to the criminal proceedings under section 138 of the n.i. act read with section 141 of the act. here in the present case though the name of the firm has been reflected in the cause title showing petitioner as partner ..... p. no.9909/2017 and in addition would rely on the following judgments and submits as under; 14.1. he relies on expeditious trial of cases16 under sec. 138, ni act 1881 more particularly paragraph no.24 thereof which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:24. the upshot of the above discussion leads us to the following conclusions:24 ..... that the partnership firm has not been made party in the complaint. the question whether such description, is substantial compliance of the requirements of section 138 read with section 141 of the act, is a matter to be analyzed by the trial court in the first instance. we do not intend to answer any other contention except to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Smt K R Aruna Prasad Vs. Sri V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... the offence. the deeming provision makes its imperative to join partnership firm as party being principal offender to the criminal proceedings under section 138 of the n.i. act read with section 141 of the act. here in the present case though the name of the firm has been reflected in the cause title showing petitioner as partner ..... p. no.9909/2017 and in addition would rely on the following judgments and submits as under; 14.1. he relies on expeditious trial of cases16 under sec. 138, ni act 1881 more particularly paragraph no.24 thereof which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:24. the upshot of the above discussion leads us to the following conclusions:24 ..... that the partnership firm has not been made party in the complaint. the question whether such description, is substantial compliance of the requirements of section 138 read with section 141 of the act, is a matter to be analyzed by the trial court in the first instance. we do not intend to answer any other contention except to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2024 (HC)

M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries Vs. M/s. Lakshmi Venkateshwar

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... mentioned therein. the trial court further holds that the petitioners herein have not taken defence as contemplated under clause (e) of the sub- section 2 of section 30 of the act. the trial court ought to have relied upon the said provision.9. the petitioners herein have specifically pleaded questioning the validity of the ..... high court with regard to rectification of trademark application, the trial court ought to have exercised its discretion in entertaining the application filed under section 124 of the act.14. per contra, counsel for the respondent would vehemently contend that the suit was filed for the relief of permanent injunction and in the ..... following point would arise for consideration of this court: i. whether the trial court has committed an error in dismissing the application filed under section 124 of the act filed praying stay of further proceedings in the suit?.18. having considered the material on record particularly the pleadings of plaintiff as well as defendants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2024 (HC)

Mr R Gopal Reddy Vs. Mr. Mohammed Mukaram

Court : Karnataka

..... question. they were also aware of the fact that the petitioner was serving in the indian army at the siachin glacier. in fact, while the police had filed the charge-sheet against jabbar singh for offence under section 25 of the act along with other offences, it cited the petitioner as a prosecution witness. therefore, the police ..... tractor-trolly for transporting poppy husk, it is clear that the prosecution could not bring its case, against the appellant, within the purview and scope of section 25 of ndps act, and the essential requirements to prove knowledge are missing. there is not even an iota of evidence that the appellant knew about the other two convicts ..... purpose the premises was taken for rent on the said date. therefore, it would be unjust to permit to be tried under section 25 of the act, on the score that section 35 of the act raises a presumption against the petitioner.10. in the light of unequivocal facts narrated hereinabove and the judgments rendered by the apex .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Captain Mr Arun P Nayar Vs. State By Jeevan Bheemanagar Police Station

Court : Karnataka

..... of criminal procedure. thus, the writ petition filed by dr. s. murugan is liable to be dismissed. ..76. straight reading of the provisions of the sexual harassment act, section 19(g) is unambiguous in respect of the assistance to be provided by the employer. it stipulates that it is the duty of the employer to provide assistance to the ..... of tamil nadu3 has held as follows:3. 2019 scc online mad. 519 49 . . .26. the learned counsel for smt. h. jayalakshmi reiterated that under section 19(g) of the act, it is the duty of the employer and therefore, they have no option except to register an first information report and proceed with the investigation as per the ..... was sexually assaulted or harassed, at the outset she should have complained in the organization for it to be placed before the committee constituted under the act. though for an offence under section 354a of the ipc, this is not a pre-requisite, the facts obtaining in the case at hand would clearly indicate that in an action which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Mr Puneet Kumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of criminal procedure. thus, the writ petition filed by dr. s. murugan is liable to be dismissed. ..76. straight reading of the provisions of the sexual harassment act, section 19(g) is unambiguous in respect of the assistance to be provided by the employer. it stipulates that it is the duty of the employer to provide assistance to the ..... of tamil nadu3 has held as follows:3. 2019 scc online mad. 519 49 . . .26. the learned counsel for smt. h. jayalakshmi reiterated that under section 19(g) of the act, it is the duty of the employer and therefore, they have no option except to register an first information report and proceed with the investigation as per the ..... was sexually assaulted or harassed, at the outset she should have complained in the organization for it to be placed before the committee constituted under the act. though for an offence under section 354a of the ipc, this is not a pre-requisite, the facts obtaining in the case at hand would clearly indicate that in an action which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Ms. Roli Singh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of criminal procedure. thus, the writ petition filed by dr. s. murugan is liable to be dismissed. ..76. straight reading of the provisions of the sexual harassment act, section 19(g) is unambiguous in respect of the assistance to be provided by the employer. it stipulates that it is the duty of the employer to provide assistance to the ..... of tamil nadu3 has held as follows:3. 2019 scc online mad. 519 49 . . .26. the learned counsel for smt. h. jayalakshmi reiterated that under section 19(g) of the act, it is the duty of the employer and therefore, they have no option except to register an first information report and proceed with the investigation as per the ..... was sexually assaulted or harassed, at the outset she should have complained in the organization for it to be placed before the committee constituted under the act. though for an offence under section 354a of the ipc, this is not a pre-requisite, the facts obtaining in the case at hand would clearly indicate that in an action which .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //