Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 58 signing in blank and failure to report Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.060 seconds)

Sachdev Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1964CriLJ337

..... section 3 thereof, shall, wherever they may be serving, be deemed to be on active service within the ..... or of any to be on active service within the meaning of this act.in the instant case the central government issued the notification which reads as under:-in exercise of the powers conferred by section 9 of the army act., 1950 (46 of 1950), the central governed hereby declares that all persons subject to that act, who are not on active service under clause (1) of .....

Ram Sarup Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC247; 1965CriLJ236; [1964]5SCR931

..... 1. ram sarup, petitioner, was a sepoy in 131 platoon dsc, attached to the ordnance depot, shakurbasti. as a sepoy, he is subject to the army act, 1950 (xlvi of 1950), hereinafter called the act. 2. on june 13, 1962 he shot dead two sepoys, sheotaj singh and ad ram and one havildar pala ram. he was charged on three counts ..... accordance with it. magistrates can question it and the government, in case of difference of opinion between the views of the magistrate and the army authorities, decide the matter finally. 19. section 69 provides for the punishment which can be imposed on a person tried for committing any civil offence at any place in or beyond india ..... against whom the offence is committed. 24. lastly. it may be mentioned that the decision of the relevant military officer does not decide the matter finally. section 126 empowers a criminal court having jurisdiction to try an offender to require the relevant military officer to deliver the offender to the magistrate to be proceeded against .....

Paul Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... exception either as requiring procurement by negotiation, rather than by competitive bidding, or as absolutely prohibiting negotiation when prices are fixed by state law. section 2304(a)(10), came to the 1947 act from earlier army procurement statutes. see h.r.rep.no.109, 80th cong., 1st sess. 8. it was "intended to place the maximum responsibility for decisions ..... .c. 2304(a)(10). [ footnote 19 ] h.r.rep.no.109, 80th cong., 1st sess. p. 6. [ footnote 20 ] section 2304(f), which incorporates the walsh-healey act (41 u.s.c. 35-45), the davis-bacon act (40 u.s.c. 276a), and the eight hour law (40 u.s.c. 324, 325a). [ footnote 21 ] the ill which ..... which it is impracticable to obtain competition." this exception to the normal bidding procedure was first enacted in the army appropriations act of 1901, 31 stat. 905. until 1947, it applied only to army procurement, and one of the purposes of the act was to make the exception applicable to all services. [ footnote 2/20 ] in explaining the existing .....

Michael Villavarayar and Anr. Vs. Workmen, represented by Secy. Boatme ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1963Mad351; (1963)IILLJ203Mad

..... discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the navy (discipline) act, 1934. (34 of 1934); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of ..... ms. no. 3375 (lab) dated 5-10-1959 the government referred this matter as an industrial dispute to the labour court at madurai, under section 10 of the industrial disputes act (act xiv of 1947). the management (michaei villavarayar, the writ petitioner and the appellant herein) urged as a preliminary ground that the court did not have ..... office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.' we might here usefully extract the definition of 'industrial dispute' in section 2(k), which is to the following effect: 'industrial dispute' means, any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between .....

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

..... at one point, representative roberts said, "loss of citizenship is a punishment," to which representative hull of iowa replied, "certainly." id. at 114. section 504 of the nationality act of 1940, 54 stat. 1172, repealed the portion of the 1865 statute which dealt with flight from the jurisdiction to avoid the draft. however, in ..... three sources of recognized constitutional power: the implied power to enact legislation for the effective conduct of foreign affairs; the express power to wage war, to raise armies, and to provide for the common defense; and the inherent attributes of sovereignty. the appellants argue that this legislation, like the statutory provision sustained in perez v ..... be vested in anyone other than himself, and he was further disturbed that placing the power in the secretary of the navy would result in discrimination against army people. the president's second reason, however, indicates that, to him, retention of the law as it stood would serve a purpose always sought to .....

Chiranji Lal Multani R.B. (Private) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Thro ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H372

..... government may not be committed by any and every public servant. similar measures had been adopted under the previous constitutional acts, vide section 30 of government of india act, 1919, and section 175 of government of india act, 1935. clause (1) of article 299 is a mandatory provision calling for strict compliance and the infraction of the ..... a ministry of agriculture. the new ministry of food would deal with the same business as before its merger with the ministry of agriculture in december, 1950. this order was made by the president in pursuance of clause (3) of article 77 of the constitution and it was to take effect from such ..... purchase, for and on behalf of the president of india'. the communication was headed-'government of india, ministry of food and agriculture, directorate general of food, (army purchase organisation).'on the basis of this agreement the plaintiff-appellant started supplying large quantities of gram, but they were rejected as unfit. the plaintiff also filed an .....

M. Clarance Vs. M. Raicheal and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1964Kant67; AIR1964Mys67; ILR1963KAR788; (1963)2MysLJ122

..... between the parties in filing this petition.36. the important point however for consideration is whether there was connivance on the part of the petitioner as per section 14 of the act which i have already referred to. connivance on the part of the petitioner disentitles him from seeking the remedy of dissolution of manage. stroud in his ' ..... marriage with the co-respondent. his intention in so doing is immaterial. the principle laid down in the leading case on the subject manning v. manning, reported in (1950) all er 602 is applicable to the present case.39. the instant case appears to be one out of the ordinary for, the petitioner in this case has certain ..... . f. for the purpose of his marriage and went back soon thereafter. the spouses did not set up a home anywhere after their marriage. the petitioner joined the army and led an itinerant life for years together. at the time when his evidence was recorded in the district court, he mentions the place of his residence at vaniyambadi. .....

Construction Laborers Vs. Curry

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to pick up, deliver or transport any goods or not to perform any services." "nothing in this paragraph (7) shall be construed to permit any act which would otherwise be an unfair labor practice under this section 8(b)." see also meat cutters local 427 v. fairlawn meats, inc., 353 u. s. 20 , 353 u. s. 23 ; radio ..... collective bargaining representative, unless such labor organization is currently certified as the representative of such employees:" " * * * *" "(c) where such picketing has been conducted without a petition under section 9(c) being filed within a reasonable period of time not to exceed thirty days from the commencement of such picketing: provided, . . . that nothing in this subparagraph (c) ..... to the whole record, as we are entitled to do in determining questions of finality, department of banking v. pink, 317 u. s. 264 , 317 u. s. 268 ; gospel army v. los angeles, 331 u. s. 543 , 547; richfield oil corp. v. state board of equalization, 329 u. s. 69 , 329 u. s. 72 , and concluded .....

P.M. Isaac John Vs. Mrs. Beatrice John and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1964Ker102

..... as the first respondent lived at chombala until the co-respondent left the house by the year 1958. on these averments the petition was presented under section 10 of the indian divorce act for the dissolution of the petitioner's marriage, on the ground that the first respondent has been guilty of adultery. the two respondents denied the charge ..... a decree as prayed, for.2. it was common ground, that the co-respondent, a bachelor aged about 38, was living in the house at chombala from june 1950 till the year 1958, the other instates of the house being the first respondent's mother, and the first respondent's brother who had been undergoing treatment at a ..... velu pillai j.1. this is a reference under section 17 of the indian divorce act for confirmation of the decree for the dissolution of a marriage. the petitioner, while employed as a lieutenant in the army, married the first respondent at poona on the 11th july 1949. the latter lived for a time with the petitioner, but on occasions, .....

United States Vs. Carlo Bianchi and Co., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the diversion of water, to be lined with concrete and to have permanent steel supports as protection for a 50-foot section at either end. the specifications did not call for such permanent supports throughout the remainder of the tunnel, but only for "[t]emporary tunnel protection . . . ..... accorded claimants in administrative proceedings. thus, they are specifically exempt from 5 and from 7 of the administrative procedure act. 5 u.s.c. 1004, 1006. the exemption from 7 is highlighted in this case. that section provides in part: "every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary ..... administrative determination, or is free to receive new evidence on such issues. in 1946, the respondent, carlo bianchi and company, entered into a contract with the army corps of engineers for the construction of a flood control dam. included in the work to be performed was the construction of a 710-foot tunnel, designed for .....