Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 58 signing in blank and failure to report Year: 1953 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.051 seconds)

Orloff Vs. Willoughby

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to a commission as a matter of law. pp. 345 u. s. 88 -92. (a) neither the universal military training and service act nor the army reorganization act requires that all personnel inducted under the doctors' draft act and assigned to the medical corps be either commissioned or discharged. pp. 345 u. s. 88 -89. (b) the commissioning of ..... in his application concerning prior membership or association with certain organizations designated page 345 u. s. 86 by the attorney general of the united states on october 30, 1950, pursuant to executive order 9835," that the court was without jurisdiction, and that habeas corpus does not lie for the purpose of the case. by way of traverse ..... play for the latter organization. over a period of 7 1/2 months, i attended classes at the jefferson school of social sciences (ending in the spring of 1950). with respect to any other organizations contained on the annexed list, i am page 345 u. s. 90 compelled to claim my federal constitutional privilege. however, i .....

Holmes Vs. U S

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the spanish american war no draft provision was enacted- congress merely called for a volunteer army. apart from certain laws reorganizing the national militia, it was not until the selective draft act of 1917 that congress provided for conscription into the regular army. accordingly, mr. justice cardozo's statement in hamilton that congress' power to institute a ..... that a declaration of war is essential for conscription an answer to this important undecided constitutional question. i would therefore grant certiorari in this case. footnotes footnote 1 section 12(a) provides in part: 'any member of the selective service system ... charged as herein provided with the duty of carrying out any of the provisions ..... distilleries & warehouse co., 251 u.s. 146 , the court has held that 'war' extends beyond the cessation of hostilities. in knauff the court said as recently as 1950 that we were then in a state of war. 338 u. s. at 546, 70 s.ct. at 314. because no decision of this court has faced the .....

Balak Ram and ors. Vs. Sita Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1954HP6

..... court, and a subsequent application to implead mm was rejected. the appeal was dismissed.4. there was no argument before me on the question of the notice under section 80, civil p. c. the order of the district judge rejecting the plaintiffs appellants' application to implead kanthu defendant as respondent in that court was questioned in the ..... century by the french jurist ernst roguih in his la science juridique pure, as pointed out by julius stone in his 'the province and function of law', second (1950) edition, at page 86. roguin took to task austin for his assertion that the sovereign cannot have rights and duties. the argument adopted by austin and others ..... broken down, possession was taken of the premises under the defence of the realm acts and regulations made thereunder. a. petition of right was brought against the crown claiming compensation as a matter of right for the use of the hotel by the army authorities. it was argued for the crown that there was a prerogative to take .....

Dalehite Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... come through the accepted principles of the common law as to torts of public officials acting within their delegated authority. see also barnes, the crown proceedings act, 1947, 26 canadian bar.j. 387, 390, and the crown proceedings act, 1950, 28 new zealand l.j. 49, 50, 52-53. australia and new zealand ..... the operation of these facilities, and problems and methods involved in their administration, which are covered in succeeding parts." [ footnote 34 ] "the provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall not apply to. . . . any claim arising from the activities of the tennessee valley authority." 28 u.s.c. 2680( ..... were responsible for the application of these specifications, liaison with supply officials, page 346 u. s. 21 and satisfaction of production schedules, pursuant to an army standard operating procedure. beyond this, operations were controlled by the administering corporation, which supplied the personnel and production experience required. [ footnote 5 ] fgan's .....

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Govt. of West Bengal ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1954Cal134

..... servants entrusted with the execution of a warrant at authorisation of a search of certain premises by the income-tax investigation commission under section 6(8) of the taxation on income (investigation commission) act, 1947 (act xxx of 1947). the learned magistrate, although he examined a number of witnesses did not go into the evidence at all before ..... a warrant of authorisation.in deciding whether these arguments are correct or not, section 6(9) and rule 8(1) of the rules under the act have got to be construed. section 6(9) runs as follows :'subject to any rules made in this behalf under this act, any authorised official shall have power (i) to examine at all reasonable ..... the provisions of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 (act v of 1898), relating to searches, so far as can be made applicable, shall apply to searches made under the authority of this section.' rule 8(1) runs as follows :'the commission may, by a written order signed by the chairman, or a member or secretary to the .....

Sagir Ahmad and ors. Vs. the Govt. of the State of Uttar Pradesh and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All257

..... not think that there is any essential difference between the two.' whereas the proviso to section 2, part c states (laws) act, 1950 authorised the central government to make express provision for the repeal of an existing law, section 6 of the essential supplies act authorises the central government to achieve the same object impliedly by passing an order or making ..... of property. dalziel had taken land from the bank upon a weekly tenancy and carried upon that land the business of parking motor cars. the minister for the army took possession of this land for defence purposes. it was held that this taking over amounted to an acquisition, as the word was not restricted to any ..... of these two decisions was of assistance to the petitioners in supporting their contention. reliance was placed on the well known case of the -- 'minister of state for the army v. dalziel', 68 comm-w lr 261 (o), particularly, on the following observation of rich j. at page 286:'in such circumstances, he may well say: ' .....

United States Vs. Chapman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... due to the united states, because, as the commission's statement indicates, the question is not before us in this case. [ footnote 8 ] section 7(b) of the federal power act provides: "whenever, in the judgment of the commission, the development of any water resources for public purposes should be undertaken by the united states itself ..... and are, therefore, eligible for future appropriations. without such an authorization, no appropriation can be had." [ footnote 3/3 ] the interpretation placed on the act by the army corps of engineers are entitled to no weight. the corps of engineers is not an administrative agency charged with the responsibility of deciding issues of policy. its ..... is the estimate that public development at this site would not, in the normal course, be undertaken for many years. see examiner's decision of march 17, 1950, r., i, 109. congress was, of course, aware that, by granting a license to private enterprise, the federal power commission would not commit the site .....

Dameron Vs. Brodhead

Court : US Supreme Court

..... personal property, colorado was free to do so. our grant of certiorari rested on 28 u.s.c. 1257(3). 344 u.s. 891. page 345 u. s. 324 section 514 of the act was added, in large part, in 1942. it then provided essentially that: "for the purposes of taxation in respect of any person, or of his property, income, or ..... directly related to an activity which the constitution delegated to the national government, that "to declare war," u.s.const. art. i, 8, cl. 11, and "to raise and support armies." id., cl. 12. since this is so, congressional exercise of a "necessary and proper" supplementary power such as this statute must be upheld. pittman v. home owners' loan corp., 308 ..... which they live is matter for another day." the federal property used by the soldier, his activities as a federal employee, every phase of the functions he performs for the army are immune from state taxation because his work is the work of the national government. but the wages that he makes, as graves v. new york ex rel. o' .....

Albertson Vs. Millard

Court : US Supreme Court

..... its executive secretary, filed a complaint in the united page 345 u. s. 243 states district court or the eastern district of michigan. sections 2-5, inclusive, and section 7 of the act were alleged to violate various provisions of the federal constitution. a declaratory judgment to that effect was sought, along with an injunction to prevent ..... there are no ambiguities involving these appellants. the constitutional questions do not turn on any niceties in the interpretation of the michigan law. the case is therefore unlike rescue army v. municipal court, 331 u. s. 549 , and its forebears, where the nature of the constitutional issue page 345 u. s. 246 would depend on the ..... mandate and decision in this case. we deem it appropriate in this case that the state courts construe this statute before the district court further considers the action. see rescue army v. municipal court of city of los angeles, 331 u. s. 549 (1947); american federation of labor v. watson, 327 u. s. 582 , and spector .....

Thomas Vs. Hempt Brothers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in manufacturing cement mixtures, and then haul these mixtures in trucks to customers. their customers were the pennsylvania turnpike, the pennsylvania railroad company, an airport, an army depot, and a navy depot, all located within the state of pennsylvania. the concrete was processed for use by these customers on pennsylvania projects. the railroad used ..... court of pennsylvania syllabus petitioner sued respondent for overtime pay, liquidated damages, and counsel fees under 6, 7 and 16(b) of the fair labor standards act, alleging that he was employed in producing roadbuilding materials in pennsylvania which were sold for use in pennsylvania by an interstate road, railroad, and airport and other ..... entered on the ground that the complaint failed to show a recoverable cause of action under the fair labor standards act. 371 pa. 383, 89 a.2d 776. and see 1948, 62 pa.dist. & co. 618, 626, and 1950, 74 pa.dist. & co. 213, 218. in sustaining dismissal of the complaint, the state supreme court .....