Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... hectare without obtaining environment clearance from the competent authority., that in compliance of the order dated 27.02.2012 the state government under section 15 of the mmdr act issued notification dated 19.06.2012 and made necessary amendment in the rules of 1986 while incorporating all the recommendations of the moef of ..... or as the case may be, by the state level environment impact assessment authority (sleiaa) constituted by the central government under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, in accordance with the procedure specified in the notification.4. the clause-4 of the notification dated 14th september, 2006 categorized ..... 14th september, 2006 issued under sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986 and sub-section (1) and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, in supersession of its earlier notification dated 27th january, 1994, except in respect of things done or omitted to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , accused bharat lal was 3 arrested on 6.5.2006 vide ex.p/19 at about 10.30 a.m.and after his arrest upon his information under section 27 of the evidence act on 08.05.2006, the sword was recovered vide ex.p.18. the body of deceased was handed over to the family members after post-mortem and thereafter ..... , statement of prosecution witnesses under section 161 cr.p.c.were recorded. after completion of investigation, challan was filed by the sho, p.s.anandpuri in the court of ..... to the court of addl. district & sessions judge (fast track).banswara for trial. in the trial, statement of 17 prosecution witnesses were recorded and the statement of accused appellant under section 313 cr.p.c.were also recorded and in defence statement of dw-1 gulab singh were recorded by the trial court. the trial court after recording the evidence of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... according to petitioner, the government of rajasthan, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 101 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 read with sections 261 and 90 thereof and section 28 read with section 7 of the rajasthan colonisation act, 1954, made the rules of 1966 with an object to recognise and reward the members ..... "defence service" is concerned, according to interpretation placed by the respondents thereto, based on preamble of the rules, it only means the members of the indian army. but, rigor of that rule has been somewhat relaxed by its amendment because even the members of the police service have been included within the purview of the ..... to the members of the border security force or the central reserve police force, whereas the rules do not expressly restrict such benefit to only members of indian army. though, the rules of 1966, as seen from its statement of objects and reasons, intended to cover the members of all defence services. 12. this very .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... submitted that by leading trustworthy evidence, the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, trial court has correctly held the appellant guilty for offence under section 302 i.p.c.on the basis of last seen evidence and oral evidence of the prosecution so also considering the conduct of the appellant, therefore, the instant ..... so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. in view of above discussions, we are of the opinion that prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond ..... major contradiction is there in the statement of witnesses but also the medical evidence is not corroborating the prosecution evidence, therefore, the conviction of accused appellant under section 302 and 449 of i.p.c.is not sustainable in law. consequently, while giving benefit of doubt to the appellant, the appeal filed by the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 17.01.2015 passed by the appellate court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872 ( the act ) has been rejected. the petitioner filed a suit before the trial court seeking permanent injunction to the effect that the defendants be ..... , the trial court non-suited the petitioner only on account of the 4 documents exhibit-a/2 & a/4 in view of the provisions of section 92 of the act and, therefore, the plea raised by the petitioner regarding genuineness of the said documents assumed great significance. it was submitted that the petitioner immediately raised ..... rejected. the petitioner did not take any action against the said order. during the pendency of the proceedings before the trial court, no application under section 45 of the act was filed by the petitioner and even in the appeal the application has been filed after passage of almost two years.no explanation whatsoever has been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the parties came to the conclusion that the suit was primarily based on termination of tenancy by issuance of notice under section 106 of the act and, therefore, the provisions of section 114 of the act were not applicable and, consequently, dismissed the application. learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the trial court fell in ..... with delivery of possession; the defendants neither paid nor tendered agreed rent and committed default; a notice dated 27.08.2010 under section 106 read with section 111(h) of the act was issued and the tenancy was terminated; based on the said averments, the plaintiff sought possession of the suit shop, arrears of ..... by the petitioner aggrieved against order dated 08.03.2013 passed by the trial court, whereby, the application filed by the petitioners under section 114 of the transfer of property act, 1882 ('the act') has been rejected. the suit was filed by the respondent-plaintiff for eviction of the petitioners from the suit premises; it was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... under the aforesaid offences and after completing investigation, the charge-sheet was filed against the respondents under section 323, 324 and 341 ipc and under section 3(2)(5) and 3(1)(10) of the sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act. the case was committed to the sessions court and finally the trial took place in the court ..... sessions case no.54/2010 by which the learned trial court acquitted the respondents for the offences under section 323, 324 and 307 ipc and under section 3(2)(5) and 3(1)(10) of the sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act. 2. as per the facts of the case the complainant arun kumar khatik pw-4 gave statement ..... of learned special judge, sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act, bhilwara. 4. in the trial, the statement of 16 prosecution witnesses were recorded and 19 documents were exhibited. thereafter, the statements of respondents were recorded under section 313 cr.p.c. and no evidence was produced by the respondents in their defense. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... as well and it cannot be said that the jurisdiction of the revenue court is affected thereby. further interestingly, an important provision contained in the act i.e.section 242 has to be noticed which mandates that even before the civil court, if the issue pertaining to the tenancy rights if raised / arises, ..... try the suit contemplates types of declaratory suits relating to the agricultural land or the declaratory suits of the special type only. sub-section (2) of section 207 of the act states that no court other than the revenue court shall take cognizance of any such suit or application or of any suit or ..... in the following cases :- (a)..............................(b)..............................(c)..............................(d).where the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law; . section 207 of the act reads as under :- 207. suits and applications cognizable by revenue court only- (1) all suits and applications of the nature specified in the third .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... with the project. they could not have continued in employment, as they were not appointed against any post. their services were, thus, governed under sec.25fff(2) of the act. on 31.3.1995, the project was completed and was dedicated to the nation by the hon'ble prime minister on 19.8.1995, after ..... of the ministry of defence. it further held that before terminating services of the workmen, the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short, the act .) were not followed and that section 25fff(2) of the act was not applicable, as the workmen had worked for more than one year in establishment. the industrial ..... project manager, iti limited, bikaner, it was stated that iti limited is a company, registered under the companies act, 1956 in which the central government holds 100% share. the ministry of defence had entrusted the project for army static communication network to the company. the project was assigned to iti, bikaner. the project was temporary in nature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... with the project. they could not have continued in employment, as they were not appointed against any post. their services were, thus, governed under sec.25fff(2) of the act. on 31.3.1995, the project was completed and was dedicated to the nation by the hon'ble prime minister on 19.8.1995, after ..... of the ministry of defence. it further held that before terminating services of the workmen, the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short, the act .) were not followed and that section 25fff(2) of the act was not applicable, as the workmen had worked for more than one year in establishment. the industrial ..... project manager, iti limited, bikaner, it was stated that iti limited is a company, registered under the companies act, 1956 in which the central government holds 100% share. the ministry of defence had entrusted the project for army static communication network to the company. the project was assigned to iti, bikaner. the project was temporary in nature .....
Tag this Judgment!