Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 55 injury to property Court: rajasthan Page 9 of about 187 results (0.038 seconds)

Laxman Singh Vs. Arun Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj2050; 2003(2)WLC27

..... the nature of the objections raised by him and the voting papers to which those objections related. it is in the light of this background that section 83(1) of the act has to be applied to the petitions made for inspection of ballot boxes. such an application must contain a concise statement of the material facts.iv ..... subsequently, cannot be accepted. the district returning officer khemraj dw.12 was not cross examined on these lines by the petitioner. from the report under section 66 of the representation of people act (ex.d.8) it is established that application for recount was rejected then and there as no particular reason for recount was mentioned in it. ..... votes is made out by definite factual statements, credible and probative material. according to mr. joshi, learned counsel secrecy of voting is defined in section 94 of the representation of people act 1951 according to which no witness or other person can be asked as to for whom he voted at an election and if recount of votes .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Roopkanwar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC127; 2007ACJ1394; RLW2006(2)Raj1034

..... coverage of liability the insurance company in that case was held liable to meet the claim for penalty and interest as imposed upon the insured under section 4-a(3) of the compensation act. this judgment proceeded on its own facts and was concerned with a situation converse to the one as was examined by the karnataka high court in ..... , learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the insurance company does not dispute its liability by way of compensation as well as the interest in terms of section 95(2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, correctness of the award is challenged only as regards penalty. it was submitted that in ved prakash garg v. premi devi 1997 (8) scc ..... single judge dated 1.8.1990 in s.b. civil misc. appeal no. 86/1985 dismissing the appeal of the appellant insurance company under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (in short 'the act')2. in view of the limited controversy involved in this appeal it is not necessary to set out the facts of the case in .....

Kamla Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... according to petitioner, the government of rajasthan, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 101 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 read with sections 261 and 90 thereof and section 28 read with section 7 of the rajasthan colonisation act, 1954, made the rules of 1966 with an object to recognise and reward the members ..... "defence service" is concerned, according to interpretation placed by the respondents thereto, based on preamble of the rules, it only means the members of the indian army. but, rigor of that rule has been somewhat relaxed by its amendment because even the members of the police service have been included within the purview of the ..... to the members of the border security force or the central reserve police force, whereas the rules do not expressly restrict such benefit to only members of indian army. though, the rules of 1966, as seen from its statement of objects and reasons, intended to cover the members of all defence services. 12. this very .....

Bhojoo Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj1916

..... ex. p. 30 and ex. p. 31. the recovery was established by the evidence of ravindra singh, 10 (pw. 9). similarly the appellant rajendra singh gave information under section 27 of evidence act about the stone, allegedly used in commission of offence, and on that basis the recovery was effected vide memo ex. p. 25. the recovery was established by the ocular ..... appellant rajendra cheated badri prasad and received a sum of rs. 48,000/- from him. rajendra knew that he was not in a position to get sardara employed in the army, but still he took sardara with him and with the help of his cousin bhojoo singh killed sardara. bhojoo singh took active part in providing assistance to rajendra in the ..... ) on december 12, 1999 rajendra took badri prasad to his house and arranged meeting with vikram singh, who promised to get the job for his son in the army if he was ready to pay a sum of rs. 50000.(iv) on december 26, 1999 rajendra went to the tea stall of badri prasad and took sardara with him. .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. S.S. Kothiyal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1995(2)WLC288; 1995(1)WLN351

..... the petitioner even in the army was a high average record otherwise he would not have been absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force. there is nothing to indicate in the proceedings the ..... recorded in the dpc proceedings that only such officers were appointed and absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force, who had a high average record in the army and who did well during the interview. there were no interviews held for the post of deputy commandants. it, thus, leads to a conclusion that the record of ..... (respondent no. 1 in the appeal) joined as commissioned officer in the indian army as iind lieutenant on 30.6.1963. the petitioner was promoted as captain in the year 1965 and acting major in the year 1966. the petitioner was released from the army service on 16.9.1967 and was absorbed in the border security force where he .....

Ex. Pnr. Raghubir Mali Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj710

..... disability is not attributable to military service but is aggravated thereby and is assessed at 20% or more, the same would also entitle the person subject to army act to disability pension. the respondents however while resisting the claim of the petitioner have relied on the corrigendum dated 21.6.1996, copy of which is placed ..... appellant, should be respected until fresh medical board examines the appellant again and comes to different conclusion.8. regulation 48(b) of the pension regulations for army part i provides whether a disability attributable to or aggravated by military service shall be determined under rules in appendix ii. rule 4 thereof provides that in ..... by the petitioner was not attributable to, but aggravated by stress and strain of military service, which assessed his disability at 20%. however, as per the army order 417/74, it was for the competent authority i.e. the chief controller of defence accounts (pensions) allahabad, either to sanction or reject the disability .....

Manglaram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1970Raj32; 1970CriLJ300; 1969()WLN71

..... , passed by the city magistrate, jodhpur. the petitioner prays for the quashing of the order of his commitment to face a trial under section 6(e) of the rajasthan armed constabulary act, 1950, hereinafter called 'the act'.2. the circumstances which have led up to this application, briefly stated, are these. manglaram applicant was appointed as a constable in the ..... fact that manglaram did not run away from the service out of cowardice may influence the eventual punishment that may be awarded to him because he joined the army and remained in an area which was critical in view of the indo pakistan conflict in 1965 but merely because the statement was attested by a person inferior ..... of the prosecution is that he absented without leave. it is not in dispute that on the 11th of october, 1964, he joined as a soldier in the indian army. on the 13th of october, 1964, a first information report was lodged at the police station, udaimandir, jodhpur, against manglaram for his having deserted the r. a. .....

Abdul Hamid and ors Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... definition of the term so unambiguous would be superfluous."the expression 'government of india' was substituted for the expression 'queen' by the adaptation of laws order of 1950. section 121 now -18- reads- "whoever wages war against the government of india or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such war, ..... war. 26.there is a difference, says foster: (3 crown cases, pp.208, 209 and210) "between those insurrections which have carried the appearance of an army formed under leaders, and provided with military weapons, and with drums, colours, etc., and those other disorderly tumultuous assemblies which have been drawn together and conducted to ..... capture parliament house with the aid of sophisticated arms and powerful explosives. the business of parliament too was in currency when the attack was made. the act was to subvert functions of the government and de-stabilise indian society. the undoubted objective and determination of the assailants was to impinge sovereignty of indian .....

Amar Singh Madho Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1954Raj291

..... to the government on account of an estate.obviously the word 'estate' used in the definition of land revenue does not refer to the word 'estate' as defined in section 4 of the act, because if it was so, it would be going round in a circle, and the word 'estate' would be denned with reference to the same word. obviously the ..... uttar pradesh by executive action. it was, in those circumstances, that the supreme court held that a grant could not be resumed by executive action after the 25th of january, 1950, after the coming into force of the constitution. at p. 455 it was expressly stated that no opinion was being expressed on the question whether the state would have the ..... thakurs who are the offshoots of the ruling family of jodhpur, and they are the real owners of the soil. it is also mentioned at page 10 that foujbal or army tribute is levied proportionately on the jagirdars of mallani. it may toe mentioned that it is in mallani that bhomichara tenure is found in the former state of marwar. .....

Group Capt. M.S. Bhatnagar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj636

..... and i may be permitted to superannuating w.e.f. 31 aug 98 to enable me to get my ne benefit in time.sd/- m.s. bhatnagarremarks by section commanderrecommended & forwarded.sd/- s.d. kulkarni air cmdedate : 28 may 98'application dated 9.6.1998tele: 633261hq central air commandbamrauli,allahabad-211 0129 jun 98cac/2821/ ..... 23 of the instructions23. government decision on a request for premature retirement, resignation is final. however, if an officer whose application for premature retirement/resignation from the army has been accepted, wishes to withdrew his application due to unforeseen circumstances, he may apply to the central government through proper channel and his request will be ..... 14 and 15 of the writ petition. the same read as under:rule 16 of the army rules, 195416. release:-a person subject to the act may be released from the service in accordance with the releasing regulations for the army or such other regulations as may be made from time to time.para 105 of the regulations105. .....