Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 54 making away with equipment Page 91 of about 8,963 results (0.155 seconds)

Jun 19 2003 (HC)

Smt. Vimalabai Keshav Gokhale Vs. Avinash Krishnaji Biniwale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR884; 2004(1)BomCR839; 2004(1)MhLj540

..... after the collective interest of the tenant's family after his death. in any event the court cannot declare more than one person as the tenant under section 5(11)(c) of the rent act.'13. in cases such as the present one where the landlord is being denied the fruits of the decree by a member of the deceased tenant's ..... the mother and other brother was merely referred to while considering whether the ex parte decree should be set aside or not. the court did not consider section 5(11)(c) of the rent act. this judgment, therefore, will not be applicable to the question involved in this case.12. accommodation is a serious problem facing people. practically in every tenanted ..... was a tenant of the suit flat. the court held that both the petitioner as well as respondent 1 therein were qualified to be the tenants under section 5(11)(c) of the rent act. the matter travelled upto the high court. it was argued before the high court that word 'any member' would include other members of the tenant's .....

Tag this Judgment!

1832

United States Vs. Reyburn

Court : US Supreme Court

..... would have been the commission itself. the word "commission," ex vi termini, imports a written authority, and the offense under this part of the act of congress (6 u.s. 321, sec. 3) consists in issuing or delivering a commission for any ship or vessel with intent that she may be employed, &c.;, and there is ..... thomas s. reyburn, the defendant, was indicted under the provisions of the third section of the act of congress, passed april 20, 1818, entitled "an act in addition to the act for the punishment of certain crimes against the united states and to repeal the acts therein mentioned." the indictment contained four counts; the questions on which the judges of ..... hoisted buenos ayrean colors, changed her name to that of the congresso, and performed a cruise under the command of the said john chase, exercising therein acts of hostility against the subjects and government of brazil. the united states further gave in evidence from the records of this court that the aforesaid john chase stood .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2015 (HC)

K.K.Thomas Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... reported in 2008 khc6772[gorige pentaiah vs state of a.p and others] it has been observed that in order to attract the offence under section 3(i) (x) of the act, the complainant ought to have alleged that the appellant was not a member of a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe and he was intentionally ..... his land or premises and interferes with the enjoyment of his rights in any land, premises or water, in order to attract an offence under section 3(i) (v) of the act. these allegations must be alleged to attract the said offence. in this case there is no such allegation made or even the witnesses examined ..... name and on a subsequent date, third petitioner threatened him over telephone and sought to initiate action against the petitioners alleging offences under section 3 of scheduled castes and scheduled tribe (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. the learned magistrate forwarded the said complaint to the deputy superintendent of police for investigation and upon receipt of the complaint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2015 (HC)

Janpad Diwani Evam Faujdari Bar Association, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. t ...

Court : Allahabad

..... person who is not on its roll, may not get his vote. they shall accordingly, send their names to the registrar appointed under the societies registration act as provided under section 3 of the act at least before 3 months from the date of election. 32. at this stage, we would also like to bring on record that after arguments ..... if one fourth of the members of the society, approach for the said purpose. the bar council of u.p. is constituted under section 3 of the advocates act 1961. under section 6 of the said act, functions of the state bar council have been provided but no where the bar council has been conferred of any power or authority to interfere ..... in its meeting and for holding that the election officer, president and secretary of that association would be liable to be "tried for any other misconduct" under section 35 of the advocates act 1961 if election is in violation of its various provisions . 11. it is urged that in the last few months there have been several complaints from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2015 (HC)

K. Johnson Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District and ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... therefore, permitting christmas celebration by the petitioner on 25.12.2015 will lead to law and order problem. however, the information received under the right to information act from the district collector on 05.05.2010 would reveal that there is no permission granted to any person to conduct religious worship, celebration in the specified place ..... is the secretary of zion christhava narpani mantam, aramannam, cheruppaloor post, kanyakumari district and that the said mantam has been registered under the tamil nadu societies registration act in serial no.36/2010. one of the christian believers, namely, tmt.m.daisy, has permitted the society to use her private patta land situated in s ..... celebration has to be conducted only on the day of birth of jesus, the petitioner mantam cannot either advance or postpone the date of celebration. the act of the respondent in extending permission to one group and declining it to other group will amount to disparity, that is to say in tamil ( tamil ?) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1987 (SC)

Ranjit Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC2386; 1988CriLJ158; JT1987(4)SC93; (1988)ILLJ256SC; 1987(2)SCALE773; (1987)4SCC611; [1988]1SCR512; 1989(1)SLJ109(SC)

..... high court in c.w.j.c. no. 2823 of 1986 raises a substantial question as to the scope and content of the procedural safe-guards in section 130 of the indian army act, 1950 ('act') in the conduct of the courts-martial.the high court dismissed, in limine, the appellant's writ petition, under article 226, challenging the proceedings dated ..... offence had better be excerpted from the charge-sheet itself:the accused no. 1429055m signalman ranjit thakur of 4 corps operating signal regiment is charged with -army act disobeying a lawful section 41(2) command given by his superior officer in that he at 15.30 hrs. on 29.5.1985 when ordered by jc 10625ip sub ram ..... a special procedure for the trial of the offences under the 'act'. chapter vi of the 'act' comprising of sections 34 to 68 specify and define the various offences under the 'act'. section 71 to 89 of chapter vii specify the various punishments. rules 106 to 133 of the army rules 1954 proscribes the procedure of, and before, the summary court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 2008 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Rajpal Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(57)BLJR271; JT2008(12)SC476; 2008(14)SCALE591; (2009)1SCC216; 2009(3)SLJ71(SC):2008AIRSCW7809

..... pleasure of the president. section 19 clothes the central government with the power of dismissal ..... of the physical status of the army personnel, it will be useful to briefly refer to relevant statutory provisions.16. chapter iv of the army act, 1950 (for short `the act') deals with the conditions of service of the army personnel. section 18 of the act provides that every person subject to the act shall hold office during the ..... there cannot be any compromise on that score. it is with this object in view, the legislature has enacted the army act, 1950; the armed forces medical services act, 1983 and framed the rules. army orders are also issued from time to time in order to give effect to these statutory provisions in letter and spirit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2002 (HC)

Brig. V.K. Anand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2010[17]STR451

..... on the very next date i.e. 11th april, 2002 the petitioner submitted a statutory complaint of the central government under section 27 of the army act read with para 346 of the regulations for the army. as no response was received he filed writ petition no. 2459/2002 on 17th april, 2002 as he apprehended that the ..... plea regarding pre-trial infirmities, if any. thereforee, the petitioner was not remedilessand he could still raise the contention regarding pre-trial infirmities, namely, infraction of army rule 22 to 24 during general court martial proceedings.14. to allay the fears of the petitioner that no such opportunity would be given to him now, ..... happened for quite some time. thereafter vide order dated 13th february, 2002 disciplinary action against the petitioner was initiated by conducting hearing of the charge proceedings under army rule 22 by goc 9 inf. div. (the commanding officer of the petitioner) under whom the petitioner was attached and he ordered the evidence to be reduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2001 (HC)

H.C. Chandel Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT174

..... bearing registered no. 49855. merely because the plaintiff could not pass the young officers course, was not a sufficient ground for retiring him compulsory. 14. section 13-a of the army act confers powers upon the central government to dismiss or remove from service any person subject to this fact. it reads as under:- 13-a. termination of ..... , an order for his compulsory retirement dated 27.3.1995 was passed under section 19 of the army act read with army rule 13a on payment of pension and gratuity. 7. this action has been challenged in the suit for the reasons that sections 19 of the army act deals only what the termination of service and not with compulsory retirement. show ..... cause notice under army rule 13a was bad in law as it has not been issued by the chief of the army staff but by an officer who was just holding the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2011 (HC)

Sowar Virendra Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... court of inquiry was ordered when he was with the said squadron.12. now, we have reproduced hereinabove para 8 of army order no.7/2000 which clearly stipulates that persons subject to the army act committing offence while away from their parent units will not except in case of offences committed by deserters be returned to their ..... the petitioner was attached to 234 armoured engineer regiment for finalization of disciplinary action.5. para 8 of the army order 7/2000, which is relevant needs to be reproduced. it reads as under:-"persons subject to the army act, committing offences while away from their parent units, will not, except in the case of offences committed by ..... thus there was no necessity of reverting the petitioner to the parent unit.14. it needs to be highlighted that the concluding part of para 8 of the army order clearly records that in such cases i.e. in cases where the person is not a deserter the formation commander within whose jurisdiction the offence was committed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //