Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 40 striking or threatening superior officers Court: supreme court of india Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.300 seconds)

The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. the Workmen and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC251; [1963(7)FLR463]; (1959)IILLJ830SC

..... for gratuity it would have expressly made a suitable provision in that behalf. legislature makes such provisions when it thinks necessary to do so. section 17 of the employees' provident funds act, 1952 (act 19 of 1952), for instance, confers on the appropriate government power to except from the operation of all or any of the provisions of ..... schemes had been made for some years before 1951, the question of framing a gratuity scheme was carefully examined by the labour appellate tribunal in the case of the army and navy stores ltd., bombay, and their workmen [1951] 11 l.l.j. 31. the scheme framed in this case directed the payment of gratuity on ..... to those whose services have been terminated by the management after the termination of the aforesaid award.' it appears that the respondents had raised an industrial despite in 1950 which covered their claims for scale of pay, dearness allowance, provident fund and gratuity and it was referred to the adjudication of mr. thakore. on this reference .....

K. Satwant Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC266; [1960]2SCR89

..... a charge of the first mentioned offence may be inquired into or tried by a court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction either act was done. illustration (a) to this section states that a charge of abetment may be inquired into or tried either by the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the ..... into motor roads. some of these works were executed by the army and some were entrusted to contractors. 3. after evacuation of burma its government was located at simla. in august, 1942, the government of burma advertised inviting ..... stationed there were completed to leave that country. in connection with the evacuation from burma and the defence of that country the government of burma and the army had to execute certain works such as the construction of roads, repairs and construction of bridges, strengthening and repairing of old tracks and converting railway lines .....

C.S.D. Swamy Vs. the State

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC7; 1960CriLJ131; [1960]1SCR461

..... in our opinion, those cases have no bearing upon the charge against the appellant in this case, because the section requires the accused person to 'satisfactorily account' for the possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources ..... and relations during his official tours. he added that he had received a gratuity for services rendered to the army, and also considerable sums of money as his provident fund from the imperial chemical industries, towards the end of ..... the government for the supply of twenty thousand tons of ammonium sulphate from united states of america, in february, 1950. in the course of this business deal, the said patel experienced some difficulty in obtaining government orders regarding some ..... the special judge, delhi, dated january 19, 1955, convicting the appellant under s. 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act (2 of 1947). the sentence passed upon the appellant was six months' rigorous imprisonment. 2. the facts leading upto this .....

The State of Bombay Vs. Rusy Mistry and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC391

..... either of you, and which sums were the property of the said government of india and that you both thereby committed an offence punishable under section 420 read with section 120b and/or section 34 of the indian penal code and within the cognizance of the court of session for greater bombay.'the charge to the jury is an elaborate ..... they are not persons trained to sift irrelevant evidence from the relevant and come to an objective decision. the graphic picture of the alleged past misdeeds and the fraudulent acts of the accused must have unconsciously prejudiced the jury against the accused. the usual refrain or a warning would not, and could not, undo the mischief done by ..... common intention of you accused nos. 1 and 2 both, the government of india represented by the controller of supply, accounts, bombay, and the controller o army factory accounts, calcutta, was cheated by one or other of you by dishonestly inducing the said controller of supply, accounts, bombay and the said controller of .....

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Its Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC160; [1961(2)FLR212]; (1959)IILLJ666SC; [1960]1SCR806

..... the decisions of this court where the provisions of s. 33a have been construed and considered, and so we must now turn to s. 33a. this section was inserted in the act in 1950. before it was enacted the only remedy available to the employees against the breach of s. 33 was to raise an industrial dispute in that behalf and ..... . v. rukmaji bala & ors. : (1955)illj346sc , this court was dealing with a similar problem posed by the provisions of s. 22 of act 48 of 1950, and s. 33 of the act. dealing with the effect of these sections this court held that the object of s. 33 was to protect the workmen against the victimisation by the employer and to ensure the ..... ., as he then was, who delivered the judgment of the court construed s. 33a of the act and the corresponding s. 23 of act 48 of 1950, which applied to the labour appellate tribunal then in existence, and observed that 'the scheme of the section clearly indicates that the authority to whom the complaint is made is to decide both the issues, .....

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of contracting may not be used. subject to this limitation and subject to subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers will promote the best interests of the united states. " page 360 u. s ..... reg. 7049, which revoked exec.order no. 10290, is entitled "safeguarding official information in the interests of the defense of the united states," and provides in relevant part: "sec. 7. accountability and dissemination. " " * * * *" "(b) dissemination outside the executive branch. classified defense information shall not be disseminated outside the executive branch except under ..... did not anticipate confrontation or cross-examination. [ footnote 2/8 ] the national security act amendments of 1949, 63 stat. 578, amended 213 so as to delete subparagraph 10. [ footnote 2/9 ] annual report of the secretary of the army for the fiscal year 1949 (1950) 192. [ footnote 2/10 ] part iv, 2 of exec.order no. .....