Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 31 privileges of reservists Page 96 of about 1,016 results (0.228 seconds)

Ex Cfn No. 14589670 Arul Raj Vs. P.C.D.A. (P.G. 3 Section) (Represente ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(2)KarLJ468

..... not even get the disability pension. petitioner has been fighting a losing battle for getting what is known as disability pension.3. under the army act, 1950, the army rules, 1964 and pension regulations for army, 1961, a person who is invalidated from service is also entitled to get what is known as disability pension, if at the time ..... 20% by the medical board and if the disability is attributable to military service over and above the regular pension.4. regulation 173 of the pension regulations for army, 1961 (for short, 'the regulations'), which is relevant for the purpose, reads as under:173. unless otherwise specifically provided a disability pension may be granted to ..... petitioner cannot seek to challenge the opinion of the board etc.14. the case of dhir singh china, was one where a person who had retired from army service on superannuation at and the time of retirement had. been assessed to certain extent of disability and therefore sought for disability pension over and above the .....

Lt. Genl. R.K. Anand Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC763; JT1992(1)SC101; 1992LabIC643; 1992(1)SCALE8; 1992Supp(1)SCC561; [1991]Supp3SCR498; 1992(1)LC341(SC)

..... retirement placing reliance on the subsequent letter of instructions dated 9th september, 1986. the appellant also attempted to invoke certain regulations stated to have been framed under section 192 of the army act, 1950 as contained in the army instructions book (1987 edition). the high court, after a critical examination of the various submissions made before it, came to the conclusion that the appellant was ..... of lieutenant general. the terms and conditions of his service were governed by the army act, 1950 (hereinafter called 'the act') and the rules made thereunder. section 191 of the act empowers the central government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the act. sub-section (2) of section 191 enumerates the various matters in respect of which rules may be framed by .....

C.i.C.-28512 H.J.L.T. Col. Katti Gopal Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Patna

..... the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 11.1.94 as contained in annexure 7 by reason of which statutory complaint of the petitioner under section 27 of the army act, 1950 has been rejected. a prayer has also been made to direct the respondents to re-consider the case of the petitioner for promotion.2. that ..... facts of the case lies in a narrow compass : the petitioner joined as second lieutenant in the corps of signals in the year, 1963 and got commission in the army service ..... remarks of the person considered for promotion. their lordships were also satisfied on perusal of the relevant records of adverse remarks made by the chief of the army staff against the appellant which were based upon consistent report of the court of enquiry regarding the responsibility and the role played by the appellant in professing some .....

Lt. Co. V.S. Chhanker (ic-38789 P) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2002)3UPLBEC2723

..... . we are in agreement with the aforesaid division bench decision. it is only in very rare cases that this court will interfere in army matters. under the army act, rules and regulations there is a detailed procedure about giving adverse entry and making representation/complaint against it, and the petitioner can avail of the same. it is not for ..... this court to consider whether the drop in performance given to the petitioner was justified or not as that is the task or the appropriate army authority. moreover, there .....

N.K. Sunil Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT159

..... charge sheet was given to the petitioner on 8.9.2008 in the following terms:chargearmy act section 69: committing a civil offence, that is to say using criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty contrary ..... proceed with the trial against the petitioner during the pendency of the statutory complaint dt. 26.09.2008 before the chief of army staff and let the petitioner be released from the illegal detention of respondent no. 7 since 21.06.2008 till date to ..... dt. 22.09.2008 passed by the respondent no. 6 being wholly illegal due to non compliance of rule 180 of the army rules, 1954 by applying the ratio of the aforesaid judicial precedents being relied by the petitioner in support of the present case;(b ..... that my husband will give answers to that. on this his offensive attitude suddenly subsided and he started apologizing for his shameless act and requested me not to inform anybody about this especially to my husband. he started approaching towards me on the pretext of .....

C.L. Naryana and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ127

..... was held on 7-7-1998. all the petitioners were convicted by the summary general court martial. petitioner/ accused dharam singh was convicted under sections 325/34 rpc amd section 69 of the army act, 1950 and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and dismissal from service. accused/ petitioner c.l. narayan was convicted to undergo three years ..... kohli, j.1. petitioners in all the above petitions are aggrieved of their conviction by the summary general court martial for committing civil offences under section 69 of the army act, read with section 325/34 of the ranbir penal code for causing grievous hurt to capt aseem kapoor of 60 field regiment on 8th nov 1997. all the ..... petitioners were serving at 92 base army hospital in srinagar at the time of the alleged commission of offence. petitioners in owp no. 783/2000, owp .....

Sh. R.K. Singla Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VIAD(Delhi)250; 97(2002)DLT297; 2002(62)DRJ293; [2002(94)FLR1053]; (2002)IILLJ716Del

..... supreme court in union of india and others v. major general madan lal yadav, : [1996]3scr785 where the expression 'trial commences' in the context of army act and the army rules were considered. it was held that trial commences the moment the gcm assembles for proceedings with the trial. the supreme court while considering the provisions of the ..... in terms of the code. this was in the context of the army act. however, in the subsequent judgments of the supreme court in common cause case (supra) it has been noted that a trial should be treated to have commenced when charges are framed under section 228 of the code. this is also the view of the madras ..... magistrates when cases are instituted otherwise than one on police reports such trials shall be treated to have commenced when charges are framed against the concerned accused under section 246 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973.(iii) in cases of trials of summons cases by magistrates the trials would be considered to have commenced when .....

Brig Iqbal Singh, Vsm (Retd) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT715; 2005(79)DRJ492

order andsection 63 military disciplinein that he, at new delhi, on 05 nov 2000, while holding the appointment of deputy director general, procurement and progressing organisation in master general of ordnance branch, army headquarters, improperly met shri samuel mathew, a representatives of m/s west end international, a non existent foreign firm, without verifying his antecedents and the products intended to be introduced in the army by the said firm.fourth chargearmy act an ommission prejucial to good

G. Pratibha Raghuram W/O Shri G. Raghuram and S.K. Alwar F/O G. Pratib ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR335; 2009(1)BomCR210; (2008)110BOMLR2571

..... delhi reported in : 1986crilj848 , the supreme court made a distinction between a deserter and a person who was absent without leave. it was concerned with provisions of the army act, 1950.13. then, there is a judgment dated 27th march, 1997 of a division bench of himachal pradesh high court in civil writ petition no. 96 of 1990 sandhya devi ..... ship or the place from which he deserted, unless the tribunal by which he is tried or the central government or the chief of the naval staff, otherwise directs.section 51 deals with case of breaking out of ship and absence without leave, which does not amount to desertion, and it reads:every person subject to naval law ..... proceedings of the board of inquiry conducted by the respondents, it will be important to refer to certain provisions of the navy act, 1957 and also the regulations framed under the act. we are concerned with only section 49(1), and the bare perusal of this provision would show that a person can be deserter if he absents himself from .....

Union of India and Others Vs. Ranjit Thakur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1988Supp(1)SCC525

..... of the appellant.4. contention at (a)(i) was that in the conduct of the court martial there was violation of the mandatory provisions of section 130 of the indian army act, 1950. in the present review petition it is pointed out prima facie with some justification that the court martial was a summary court martial ..... and not summary general court martial and that to the former, the provisions of section 130 were not attracted.5. but then, even if the point taken in the review petition as to the inapplicability of section ..... 130 is held to be well founded, the decision, however, appears supportable on the findings on contentions at (a)(ii) and (d). but the error, if any, as to the inapplicability of section 130 should not be left uncorrected.6. issue notice confined .....