Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 31 privileges of reservists Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 297 results (0.110 seconds)

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

..... utmost confidence warrants invariable exclusion of third parties into the defence areas. 5374. the normal rule of entitlement is, easement of necessity under section 13 of easements act, is available whenever alternative access, however inconvenient may be is not at the availability. whether pleadings or the evidence be it oral or ..... totally stand at a different footing compared to sensitive and confidential organization relating to space research organization, atomic research organization, defence 56 establishment whether of army, navy or air force. the circumstances of prevention of interference changes rapidly from time to time and place to place. the degree of apprehension of ..... rangers, grass farms, dairy farms, brick fields, soldiers and hospital gardens as provided for in paragraphs 419, 421 and 425 of the regulations for the army in india and other official requirements of the military authorities". (ii) class a(2) land which is actually used or occupied by the military authorities, .....

Shri.g.b. Devaraj Vs. State Of Kanataka

Court : Karnataka

..... be placed before the board, as the board of the corporation is the competent authority to take a decision on the report submitted by the lokayukta under section 12(3) of the act. on all these courts, the learned counsel would seek quashing of the impugned proceedings. 66. on the other hand, sri.pavan kumar, learned counsel ..... as the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent is concerned, the judgment reported in ilr1996kar1407in the case of shankar vs. karnataka land army corporation ltd., this court has held as follows: 8. it was next argued by the learned counsel for petitioners that the resolution passed by the board of ..... the karnataka civil service regulations (for short k.c.s.r. ) and made them applicable to employees of the corporation. this court in shankar v. karnataka land army corporation limited [ilr1996kar 1407.]. has held that adopting k.c.s.r. is to supplement the existing rules so as to cover all situations as were not specifically .....

Sena Vihar Owners Welfare Association (r) Vs. Sri. Bandarappa Bhakthad ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same, plaintiff preferred first appeal before the high court. the court after hearing both side and considering few judgments of hon'ble apex court and also section 110 of the evidence act, was pleased to observe in paragraph no.56 of its judgment as below:"56. here, even if ancestors of plaintiff as shebait are managing the temple ..... contention of the plaintiffs that awho was formed with the aim and objectives of procuring, developing and providing dwelling units, flats, plots etc., to serving retired personnel of army and other defence sectors who are its member registrants, is also not disputed by the defendants. it is also not in dispute that, at the request of awho, ..... every defence sector who are 4 r.f.a.no.23 of 2017 its member registrants. in pursuance of its aims and objectives awho framed army welfare housing organisation rules, 1987. in furtherance of its objectives, the awho approached bengaluru development authority (hereinafter for brevity referred to as bda ) for allotment of .....

Sanjay M Peerapur S/o Mallappa Peerapur Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... prescribed for the employees of the indian military nursing service.38. in ram sarup supra, the apex court has taken a view that every provision under the army act is a law coming under article 33 of the constitution of india. the said judgment has no application as ordinance, 1943 is not a law made by ..... provisions to achieve the goal set out in article 14.11. segregation of unequal to provide permissible protection or accommodation or to confer some advantage to the marginalised section of society is not only desirable but also a constitutional imperative. however, such an obligation has certain limitations. the classification must pass the well-established twin test. ..... effect of the ordinance passed before the independence. the said judgment has no application to the present petition as the petitioners admit that the ordinance was adapted in 1950 as provided under article 372 (2) of the constitution of india.37. much emphasis is laid on the judgment of the apex court in jasbir kaur vs. .....

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... proposed construction. it was also clarified that the petitioner could be called upon to demolish the structure in whole or part pursuant to the provisions of section 9-a of the act, or any other notifications issued pursuant to the same.19. it is the further contention of the 1st respondent that during august-september 2012, ..... of the said structure can be directed to demolish the building so as to conform to the stipulated height. in pursuance of the provisions of section 9-a of the act, the central government has issued a gazette notification dated 14.1.2010 regulating the constructions in and around different aerodromes. admittedly the hal aerodrome is ..... .84(e) dated 14.01.2010 issued by the ministry of civil aviation, government of india, in exercise of powers conferred under the provisions of section 9a of the aircraft act, 1934, to regulate construction for the safety of aircraft operations. prior to the said notification, similar notification relating to hal were 14 issued by the .....

Ex. Naik, M.S. Pemmaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR151

..... of petitioner's claim for disability pension is arbitrary, capricious, untenable and contrary to the provisions of the pension entitlement rules appended to the pension regulations (army) 1961 and further submits that the appellate authority without proper application of mind has mechanically rejected the appeal of the petitioner and therefore the orders are ..... at least casual connection must be established between disability and military service, para 423(c) of the regulations for the medical services of the armed forces act, regulation 173 of the pension regulations and rule 7(b) of appendix ii to pension regulations given an indication how to approach this problem.9. before ..... pension? to answer this precise question, provisions which require to be noticed are para 423(c) of the regulations of the medical services of armed forces act, regulations 173 of the pensions regulations and rule 7(b) of appendix ii to pension regulation.13. relevant clause of para 423 of the regulations reads .....

Brigadier M.S. Oberoi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR3313; 1994(5)KarLJ49

..... senior officer of the armed forces and he has through the present petition assailed the correctness of the order passed by the central government under section 19 of the army act on 23-4-1991 compulsorily retiring him from service. the order proceeds on the footing that the petitioner is alleged to have been guilty of ..... certain acts which in the opinion of the army authorities and the central government constituted serious misconduct which justified a direction to him to resign from service. the petitioner at that point of ..... they could come to the conclusion that the charges of serious misconduct stood proved and that the gravity of misconduct was serious enough to remove a senior army officer from service. to my mind, the conclusions were also completely unjustified insofar as the accusations even if taken as proved would at the highest amount .....

Sri n.c. Shivakumar Vs. State by Lokayuktha Police

Court : Karnataka

..... the contention, the apex court has held thus: 4. in our opinion, the contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is well founded. sub- section (1) of section 19 of the act, which is relevant for the controversy in dispute, reads as under: sanction necessary"19. previous for prosecution. (1) no court shall take cognizance of an offence ..... v. m. k. aiyappa, (supra) that in the light of the opinions in state of up v. paras nath 28 singh, subramaniam swamy v. manmohan singh and army headquarters v. cbi, (supra) that in the absence of a previous sanction, the magistrate is precluded from even receiving a complaint, it is necessary to refer to a constitution ..... overlooked the above dictum as there is no reference to the same in state of up v. paras nath singh, (2009)6 scc372 subramanyam swamy v. manmohan singh, air2012sc1185 army headquarters v. cbi, (2012) 6 scc228 m.k. aiyappa v. state of karnataka, 2014(2) kccr1412 all of which have consistently laid down that without a prior .....

M/s. G C D Motors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... particulars. apparently, the police inspector isd police station was not satisfied with the same and proceeded to register the case against the petitioner for offence punishable under section 20 of the act.3. sri. mrutyunjaya tata bangi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is running two showrooms in belagavi and he has employed his own ..... may, while employing a person as a private security guard, give preference to a person who has served as a member in one or more of the following, namely: (i) army; (ii) navy; (iii) air force; (iv) any other armed forces of the union; (v) police, including armed constabularies of states; and (vi) home guards. 12. ..... are appointed, strictly 12 by following rules and regulations. we also have a dress code to our staff and the same are not at all resembling those of police, army, navy, air force, etc. none of our employees carry any kind of weapons either in legal or illegal manner, as it is not required for our establishment. .....

M.s. Mangesh Motors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... particulars. apparently, the police inspector isd police station was not satisfied with the same and proceeded to register the case against the petitioner for offence punishable under section 20 of the act.3. sri. mrutyunjaya tata bangi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is running two showrooms in belagavi and he has employed his own ..... may, while employing a person as a private security guard, give preference to a person who has served as a member in one or more of the following, namely: (i) army; (ii) navy; (iii) air force; (iv) any other armed forces of the union; (v) police, including armed constabularies of states; and (vi) home guards. 12. ..... are appointed, strictly 12 by following rules and regulations. we also have a dress code to our staff and the same are not at all resembling those of police, army, navy, air force, etc. none of our employees carry any kind of weapons either in legal or illegal manner, as it is not required for our establishment. .....