Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 188 fresh sentence after suspension Court: bihar state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc patna

Jan 23 1998 (TRI)

Sarad Chandra Jha Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd.

Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna

..... delivered on 5.10.1991. the complaint case was filed on 23.3.1993. there was no provision of limitation in the consumer protection act 1986 before 1993 amendment. section 113 of the limitation act, 1963, in such case will be attracted where limitation period prescribed is three years. the complaint petition thus is well within limitation period. ..... on account of value of goods and compensation according to his own assessment. the jurisdiction of state commission in adjudicating this case is clearly made out according to section 17(a)(i). we therefore over- rule the objection raised by the opposite parties and hold that the complaint case is maintainable before the state commission. 8. ..... .f.c. under semfex scheme for purchase of a truck for self employment. this scheme was sponsored by b.s.f.c. for self employment of ex-army personnel. the truck undoubtedly had not been purchased for resale. according to the affidavited averment of the complainant, it was used for the purpose of earning his .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //