Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 18 tenure of service under the act Page 92 of about 931 results (0.174 seconds)

Jan 14 2011 (HC)

Faijal Hamidkhan Noor Mohmad Shah Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... was referred to as an unknown person. in spite of the same, no any test identification parade was held as per section 9 of the indian evidence act. he further submitted that the prime witnesses namely, p.w.1, p.w.3, p.w.4 and p.w. ..... suffer r.i. for one year and to pay a fine of rs.500/-. however, he was acquitted of the offence punishable under section 307 r.w. 34 of i.p.c. the reasons and findings recorded by the 3rd additional sessions judge, ahmednagar while convicting the ..... for the appellant submitted that the appellant is the original accused in cr no.50/2004 registered with shrigonda police station for offence punishable under section 307 r.w. 34 of i.p.c. along with the appellant, three other accused were involved in the said crime. however, ..... passed by learned additional sessions judge, ahmednagar in sessions case no.112 of 2004 thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under section 324 r.w. 34 of i.p.c. and sentencing him to suffer r.i. for one year and to pay a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2014 (HC)

V.Rajarethinam Vs. Registrar of Co Op. Society Housing

Court : Chennai

..... rendered in som datt datta v. union of india [air1969sc414 where ramaswami, j.delivering the judgment for the unanimous constitution bench held that provisions of sections 164 and 165 of the army act do not require an order confirming proceedings of court martial to be supported by reasons. this court held that an order confirming such proceedings does not ..... (see scc pp. 738-39, para 22).35. in m.l. jaggi v. mtnl [(1996) 3 scc119, this court dealt with an award under section 7 of the telegraph act and held that since the said award affects public interest, reasons must be recorded in the award. it was also held that such reasons are to be ..... capricious. the high court rejected such pleas and the transferee was asked to file a suit. the transferee filed an appeal to the central government under section 111(3) of the companies act, 1956 which was dismissed. thereafter, the son of the original transferee filed another application for transfer of his shares which was similarly refused by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

M. Malarvizhi Vs. Union of India, Rep. by the Postmaster General, Madu ...

Court : Chennai

..... datta v. union of india [air 1969 sc 414] where ramaswami, j. delivering the judgment for the unanimous constitution bench held that provisions of sections 164 and 165 of the army act do not require an order confirming proceedings of court martial to be supported by reasons. this court held that an order confirming such proceedings does not ..... scc pp. 738-39, para 22). 35. in m.l. jaggi v. mtnl [(1996) 3 scc 119], this court dealt with an award under section 7 of the telegraph act and held that since the said award affects public interest, reasons must be recorded in the award. it was also held that such reasons are to be recorded ..... capricious. the high court rejected such pleas and the transferee was asked to file a suit. the transferee filed an appeal to the central government under section 111(3) of the companies act, 1956 which was dismissed. thereafter, the son of the original transferee filed another application for transfer of his shares which was similarly refused by the company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2000 (HC)

Swaminathan C.S. and ors. Vs. Simpson and Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR1037]; (2001)ILLJ141Mad; (2001)1MLJ288

..... not permit the calculation of bonus after deduction of the amount on account of absence on loss of pay from the amount, of the minimum limit prescribed in section 12 of the act.18. in short, this was a question which did not cover the 'entitlement' on the part of the employees or the 'liability' on the part of ..... become an industrial dispute under section 22 of the payment of bonus act, 1965 and not an individual dispute between an employer and an employee with respect to the bonus payable to that particular employee. however, we feel ..... )illj254mad proceeded on the basis that even an individual dispute relating to bonus between an employer and an individual workman will become an industrial dispute under section 22 of the payment of bonus act, while a full bench of the andhra pradesh high court took the view that it is only the collective dispute with respect to bonus that will .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2013 (HC)

Ram Naresh Tyagi and ors Vs. Election Commission of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... electoral registration officer shall be at liberty to pass an appropriate fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners in terms of provisions of section 22-c of representation of people act, 1950. the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of this order. there shall be no orders as to costs. october31 2013/rd w.p.(c) ..... , pre-decisional hearing is imperative. 6. a perusal of the order dated 25.9.2009 passed on the appeal of mr. arun tyagi made under section 24 of the representation of people act, 1950 would show that he was seeking restoration of not only his name but also names of 841 other voters to the electoral roll. considering that mr. ..... obligations of an authority. if these aspects are appreciated in a cumulative manner, we are of the considered opinion that there has to be strict compliance of section 22 of the 1950 act as the same takes away the substantial right of a voter. the deletion or inclusion may not be a ground to set aside the election but the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1999 (HC)

Gajanand and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2000MP2

..... from lack of jurisdiction. according to him the compulsory acquisition to private land could only be decided upon and ordered by the 'appropriate government' under section 4 of the act and non else. in the present case the whole exercise was undertaken by revenue commissioner and collector, indore, which was incompetent. therefore, all ..... purpose. what is a public purpose depended upon various factors and variables. there is no comprehensive definition of the expression available even in laa. section 4 of the act also gives its inclusive definition. but broadly it is understood to mean a purpose involving community interest. its contours and parameters vary with times ..... had riot suffered any prejudice in any way, the stated purpose could not be faulted for any vagueness or indefiniteness taking away the valuable safeguards under section 5a of the act.21. in s.s. darshan's case, the land acquired for 'information technology park' was considered as public purpose. similarly in smt. somavanti .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2013 (HC)

Abhijit Vs. Dr. Smt. Aruna Tripathi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... no direct mode of communication to attend dates of hearing. accused sanjay dixit is a government servant working in jabalpur itself. matrimonial matter under section 13 of hindu marriage act from indore and under section 9 of hindu marriage act from mandla have been transferred by this court to the court of family judge, jabalpur. 3. learned counsel for the respondent submits that ordinarily ..... case no.662/2010 (smt. aruna tripathi versus abhijeet tripathi & others.is case under section 498a ipc read with section 3/4 dowry prohibition act, and (3) complaint case no.1113/2010 (smt. aruna tripathi versus abhijeet tripathi & others.under section 406 ipc read with section 6 of dowry prohibition act. 2. transfer of aforesaid cases from court of mandla to jabalpur sought mainly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1969 (FN)

Nlrb Vs. Gissel Packing Co., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . remington rand, inc., 94 f.2d 862, 868 (c.a.2d cir.), cert. denied, 304 u. s. 576 (1938). [ footnote 12 ] see n 11, supra. [ footnote 13 ] section 9(c) of the wagner act had provided: "whenever a question affecting commerce arises concerning the representation of employees, the board may investigate such controversy and certify . . . the name or names of the representatives ..... cards for the purpose designated on their face." [ footnote 6 ] see, e.g., joy silk mills, inc. v. nlrb, 87 u.s.app.d.c. 360, 185 f.2d 732 (1950), cert. denied, 341 u.s. 914 (1951); nlrb v. gotham shoe mfg. co., inc., 359 f.2d 684 (c.a.2d cir.1966); nlrb v. quality markets, inc., 387 f ..... been known as the joy silk doctrine. joy silk mills, inc., 85 n.l.r.b. 1263 (1949), enforced, 87 u.s.app.d.c. 360, 185 f.2d 732 (1950). under that rule, an employer could lawfully refuse to bargain with a union claiming representative status through possession of authorization cards if he had a "good faith doubt" as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2014 (SC)

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Arun Shourie

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in that case, coke on littleton and stroud was referred that says that court is the place where justice is judicially administered. the court also considered section 3 of the indian evidence act and sections 19 and 20 of the indian penal code and then observed, the pronouncement of a definitive judgment is thus considered the essential sine qua non of ..... the course of arguments agreed that for exercising the suo motu power for contempt under article 129 of the constitution of india, the limitation provided in section 20 of the 1971 act has no application. there is no challenge before us about the legal position that there are no implied or express limitations on the inherent powers of ..... the pretext that the commission did not have the power to call them this in the face of clear judgments to the contrary; then invoking a section of the indian evidence act which applies to a person making a dying declaration; ignoring the fact that the man who is said to have been benefited has lost rs.55 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2003 (HC)

Smt. Vimalabai Keshav Gokhale Vs. Avinash Krishnaji Biniwale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR884; 2004(1)BomCR839; 2004(1)MhLj540

..... after the collective interest of the tenant's family after his death. in any event the court cannot declare more than one person as the tenant under section 5(11)(c) of the rent act.'13. in cases such as the present one where the landlord is being denied the fruits of the decree by a member of the deceased tenant's ..... the mother and other brother was merely referred to while considering whether the ex parte decree should be set aside or not. the court did not consider section 5(11)(c) of the rent act. this judgment, therefore, will not be applicable to the question involved in this case.12. accommodation is a serious problem facing people. practically in every tenanted ..... was a tenant of the suit flat. the court held that both the petitioner as well as respondent 1 therein were qualified to be the tenants under section 5(11)(c) of the rent act. the matter travelled upto the high court. it was argued before the high court that word 'any member' would include other members of the tenant's .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //