Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 18 tenure of service under the act Page 82 of about 931 results (0.193 seconds)

Orloff Vs. Willoughby

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to a commission as a matter of law. pp. 345 u. s. 88 -92. (a) neither the universal military training and service act nor the army reorganization act requires that all personnel inducted under the doctors' draft act and assigned to the medical corps be either commissioned or discharged. pp. 345 u. s. 88 -89. (b) the commissioning of ..... in his application concerning prior membership or association with certain organizations designated page 345 u. s. 86 by the attorney general of the united states on october 30, 1950, pursuant to executive order 9835," that the court was without jurisdiction, and that habeas corpus does not lie for the purpose of the case. by way of traverse ..... play for the latter organization. over a period of 7 1/2 months, i attended classes at the jefferson school of social sciences (ending in the spring of 1950). with respect to any other organizations contained on the annexed list, i am page 345 u. s. 90 compelled to claim my federal constitutional privilege. however, i .....

Dhian Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ67

..... .01.1998, convening summary general court martial, the findings, conviction and sentence recorded by it and chief of army staff's order dated 27th of june, 2000 rejecting the statutory appeal under section 164 of the army act, 1950, petitioner, dhian singh has filed this writ petition through mrs. kamaljeet kour, his wife, seeking his liberty ..... .2. shorn of details, the petitioner's case, in nut shell, is that he had an old history of suffering from 'unspecified psychosis'. he had been receiving treatment for this disease during his employment in the army ..... the statement so made by him may to be read in the proceedings.9. the petitioner was arraigned for trial of offences under section 69 of the army act, contrary to sections 302/307 of the ranbir penal code on all the four charges. on the application of the petitioner, he was provided the services .....

Ex Sep R.S.N.Rajana Versus the Union of India Through Its Secretary Mi ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... was suspecting some search of her house. 4. the petitioner was charged for the offences u/s.52 (a) of army act 1950 for committing theft of the government property/ medicine and also u/s.63 of the army act for an act prejudicial to good order and military discipline. the charges were framed in the presence of the accused and the witnesses namely ..... martial (scm) whereby the petitioner was convicted for the offence u/s.52(b) of the army act 1950 for committing theft of medicines from army hospital (r and r) delhi cantt. and also for the offence u/s.63 of the army act for his acts which were prejudicial to good order and military discipline. he was sentenced to undergo 28 days imprisonment ..... this case are distinguishable with that case of uma shanker (supra). in that case certificate was given by the commanding officer only to the effect that provisions under army act 115(2) are here complied with . such certificate in that case was not enough. the certificate with regard to the compliance of .....

Army Welfare Housing Organisation Vs. Adjutant Generals Branch and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... as under: (a) it is clear that the appellant does not fall in sub-clauses (a), (b) and (c) of section 2(h) of the rti act; the question thus is whether the appellant is controlled by army headquarters or whether the appellant is substantially financed by ministry of defence. (b) the appellant has been shown as one of the ..... appellant do not mandate the appellant to comply with the directions of the government but the government indirectly controls the affairs of the appellant; for application of section 2(h) of the rti act, it is not necessary that the government should directly control the affairs of a public body. (xiii) even the government by showing the appellant on ..... the reasoning of the learned single judge that because the appellant is a state for the purposes of article 12 of the constitution of india, 1950, it is also a public authority under the rti act is erroneous. (e) contending that the cic in the earlier order dated 29th january, 2007 had held the appellant to be not a .....

Wetmore Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... inspectors general, deputy quartermasters general, and topographical engineers, shall have the "brevet rank," and the pay and emoluments of a major of cavalry. the section of the act of 1816, fixing the pay of paymasters, omits the words "brevet rank." as well might it be contended that they should have it as that ..... , is the contemporaneous exposition and practice under it, by the accounting officers of the treasury, and acted upon by congress, when five years afterwards it re organized the pay department of the army. the ninth section of the act of 2 march, 1821, to reduce and fix the military peace establishment, declares that there shall ..... be one paymaster general, with the present compensation, and fourteen paymasters with the pay, &c.;, of regimental paymasters. this act, in reference to the paymaster general .....

Reid Vs. Covert

Court : US Supreme Court

..... general, blumenthal, women camp followers of the american revolution. the british history is the same. see, in particular, samuel, historical account of the british army and of the law military, pp. 691-692. [ footnote 3/9 ] army act, 1955, 3 & 4 eliz. ii, c. 18, 209, and see fifth schedule, id. at 219. [ footnote 3/10 ] these ..... with them in quarters furnished by our armed forces on its military installations in foreign lands. in turning these women free, it declares unconstitutional an important section of an act of congress governing our armed forces. furthermore, four of my brothers would specifically overrule and two would impair the long-recognized vitality of an old and ..... whom general courts-martial for alleged page 354 u. s. 48 murder were deemed advisable [ footnote 2/3 ] was only 13 in the 7 fiscal years 1950-1956. it is impossible to ascertain from the figures supplied to us exactly how many persons were tried for other capital offenses, but the figures indicate that there .....

United States Vs. Macdonald

Court : US Supreme Court

..... guarantees to become engaged as to possible subsequent indictments by another sovereign. [ footnote 12 ] there is no allegation here that the army acted in bad faith in dismissing the charges. this is not a case where the government dismissed and later reinstituted charges to evade the speedy trial guarantee. ..... that year, the military charges were dismissed and the respondent was honorably discharged on the basis of hardship, but, at the justice department's request, the army criminal investigation division (cid) continued its investigation of the homicides. in june, 1972, the cid forwarded a report recommending further investigation, and the justice department, ..... they were untrue. there is nothing to suggest that the justice department acted in bad faith in not securing an indictment until january, 1975. after the army dismissed its charges, it continued its investigation at the request of the justice department; the army's initial 13-volume report was not submitted to the justice department .....

Haider Ali (Md.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... general jurisdiction raised by him was accepted comes in direct conflict with the provisions referred to above. it is hardly necessary to say that the army authorities must act in conformity with the provisions of the army act, 1950 and the army rules, 1954 including administrative instruction issued, if any, in this regard.11. in the view that we have taken of the matter, it is ..... charges against him are dismissed or they cannot be preceeded with. it was further contended that the petitioner's husband has been justly kept in military custody under section 101 of the army act considering the seriousness of the charges and in view of violent conduct and also in view of persistent allegations of threat or elimination levelled by the petitioner.6. we .....

Veerendra Mohan, Lt. Col. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(2)JKJ256

..... were found inimical to the military discipline and functional efficiency. learned counsel says that in view of the availability of equally efficacious remedy under section 27 of the army act and by way of special review the present writ petition did not warrant its admission to hearing.12. i have considered the submissions of the ..... of inquiry was perverse and unjust.5. respondents have opposed the admission of this writ petition to hearing, saying that effective alternate remedy under section 27 of the army act was available to the petitioner and having omitted to have recourse to the remedy available to him, he cannot seek judicial review of the orders ..... in the special review. he had, additionally, the remedy of raising his grievance against the action of the army authorities before the central government or an appropriate authority specified as such, under section 27 of the army act.35. in such like cases, as has been projected by the petitioner in this writ petition, jurisdiction under .....

Lt. Col. S.K.Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... 4/ the appellant s plea before the writ court was that the court-martial proceedings were barred by time in view of the mandate contained in section 122 of the army act 1950 (for short act of 1950). it was further case of the appellant before the writ court that ist. and 3rd charge in the charge sheet dated 07-03-2012 were ..... support of his contention, he referred to section 63 of the act of 1950. 8/ in order to appreciate the issue raised, it is appropriate to take note of section 122 of the act of 1950, rule 22(4), rule 53 of the rules of 1954 and regulation 451(c) of the army regulations, vol. i. section 122 of army act of 1950 :122. period of limitation for trial ..... : (1) except as provided by sub-section (2), no trial by court martial of any person .....