Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 166 form of sentence of death Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 26 of about 262 results (0.358 seconds)

Dec 05 2005 (HC)

Shivanna (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. Puttabasavaiah (Deceased) by L.Rs and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ159

..... be that as it may, the petitioner suppressing all these facts, has again initiated proceedings by way of filing the application in form 7 under section 45 of the land reforms act for registration of occupancy rights. not one, three applications have been filed by him, as stated above. the said applications filed by petitioner have ..... be called a tenant unless he cultivates the land lawfully and the lawful nature will have to be substantiated by a lease or by the factors stated in section 4 etc. a person who is not inducted lawfully, but cultivates the land, cannot claim the status of a tenant at all.... the aforesaid division ..... assailed the correctness of the order passed by the land tribunal and the appeal has been entertained contrary to the relevant provisions of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'act') and karnataka land reforms rules, 1974 (hereinafter called the 'rules'). he submitted that, the appellate authority has also failed to appreciate that, there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2006 (HC)

Ex Cfn No. 14589670 Arul Raj Vs. P.C.D.A. (P.G. 3 Section) (Represente ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(2)KarLJ468

..... not even get the disability pension. petitioner has been fighting a losing battle for getting what is known as disability pension.3. under the army act, 1950, the army rules, 1964 and pension regulations for army, 1961, a person who is invalidated from service is also entitled to get what is known as disability pension, if at the time ..... 20% by the medical board and if the disability is attributable to military service over and above the regular pension.4. regulation 173 of the pension regulations for army, 1961 (for short, 'the regulations'), which is relevant for the purpose, reads as under:173. unless otherwise specifically provided a disability pension may be granted to ..... petitioner cannot seek to challenge the opinion of the board etc.14. the case of dhir singh china, was one where a person who had retired from army service on superannuation at and the time of retirement had. been assessed to certain extent of disability and therefore sought for disability pension over and above the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Ramu Vs. Sreerama Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ451

..... m. hangal. would submit that the significant circumstance that the petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case in respect of the very same act which was alleged, has been completely ignored by the labour court in holding that the act of misconduct alleged was established by the management. the labour court, having held that the evidence on behalf of the respondent was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2006 (HC)

Serendipity Apparels (Private) Limited Vs. the Karnataka Industrial Ar ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR2163

..... 14-2-1994 at annexure-a. petitioner was issued with a possession certificate in terms of annexure-b. petitioner thereafter filed an application for exemption under the urban land ceiling act, 1976. permission was granted. petitioner thereafter submitted its project profile to the board for allotment of land through single window agency clearance. petitioner in its letter dated 17-11-1997 ..... and that it required an insertion in the clause in the lease-cum-sale agreement. there was correspondence between the petitioner in the matter of registration under the karnataka stamp act, 1957. petitioner refers to the correspondence in the body of the petition. 4. respondent-board, in the meanwhile, issued a show-cause notice on 3-2-2001 intimating as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2006 (HC)

Smt. Siddavva W/O Shivappa Hosamani, 50 Years and Smt. Paravva W/O Mal ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(5)KarLJ353

..... of the tahsildar dated 22.10.2001. admitted facts would reveal of an application by late subhash patil under section 15 of the karnataka land reforms act seeking for resumption of the lands as an ex-serviceman and has retired from the army on 31.7.1991. according to him, he issued a proper notice and that therefore, he is ..... and the same was allowed. matter was remanded. in the meanwhile, an application was filed under section 15 of the act by the respondent seeking for restoration of possession on the ground that he has retired as soldier after serving the indian army. the tahsildar passed an adverse order. aggrieved by the same, an appeal was filed before the ..... remanded. the 3rd respondent stated before the tribunal that he had filed an application under section 15 of the karnataka land reforms act, inter-alia, for resumption of the lands in question, as he is an ex-serviceman and has retired from the army on 31.7.1991 and within one year from the date of retirement, he had issued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

Shri Pundalika Savanna Kaladagi S/O Savanna Kaladagi Vs. the State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR649]

..... action having been challenged in a writ petition before this court, a single judge had held that the petition was not maintainable in view of section 15(1) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. this was challenged in appeal. in the appeal the division bench while affirming the order, held that government servant holding a civil post ..... contended as being in alleged violation of the petitioner's service conditions, the petitioner's remedy lies before the karnataka administrative tribunal in terms of section 15 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. he would submit that this is a threshold bar to the petition.9. without prejudice to the above he would further submit that ..... had a lien with the p and t department working on deputation with the army postal service, and at no point of time did he become a full fledged army personnel. his case was therefore covered under section 14(1)(a) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. and hence held that the high court was right in rejecting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2006 (HC)

State of Karnataka by Jalahalli Police Station Vs. Joseph Rodrigues S/ ...

Court : Karnataka

..... concur, under section 307, the intention precedes that act attributed to accused person. therefore as held in the case of hari kishan v. sukhabir singh reported in ..... of punishment to be imposed upon him. in order to constitute an offence under section 307 of ipc, actus reus and the requisite mens rea both must ..... case, accused cannot be convicted under section 307 of ipc. it is also a settled position that for applying section 307 of ipc, it is not necessary that the injury capable of causing death should have been acutely inflicted. section 307 also does not take into consideration the effect of the act of the accused except as a measure .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2006 (HC)

Sri Andanur Rajashekar S/O Late Andanur Basappa Vs. Sri Vasavi Industr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007(1)KarSN2; 2007(2)KLJ547; 2007(2)KCCRSN69; 2007(2)KCCR1213; 2007(1)AIRKarR497; AIR2007NOC429

..... between the parties is not void ab initio and it does not become unenforceable. the said question regarding whether the agreement is hit by section 23 of the contract act and section 80 of the reforms act has fallen for consideration in several decisions. to my mind, the said position of law is no longer res integra.20. the apex ..... non-agriculturists to purchase the land. in other words enforcement of such agreement to sell would not in itself be an illegality unless action contemplated under the land reforms act in terms of sections 82 and 83 actually takes place. 22. another division bench of this court in the case of mrs. sushila a. dass v. mrs. mary bolger reported ..... purchase of land, of course, subject to the conditions enumerated in clause (1) and (2) of the said proviso. it is no doubt true that section 23 of the contract act prohibits an agreement which is forbidden by law or agreement, if permitted would defeat the purpose of law or is fraudulent or is opposed to the public policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2006 (HC)

Naik Shekharappa Olekar S/O Late Hanumappa Olekar Vs. Union of India ( ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(1)AIRKarR185

..... to 138, medium regiment, who is aggrieved by the order of reduction in rank and dismissal from service for committing offences under the army act, 1950 [for short, the act, particularly under section 39(a) of the act on being tried by summary court martial proceedings in terms of the order dated 1-11-2002 [copy at annexure-a to the writ petition].2. ..... which was required to be confirmed and therefore the very provision of section 164 of the act is not applicable. though the impugned order at annexure-a may recite that an appeal lies to a particular officer, in fact, it is not any statutory appeal in terms of the army act and rules and if such an appeal/representation had been made and ..... that officer has disposed of, no exception can be taken to that order on the premise that the order is not one in consonance with section 164(2) of the act this is so in view of the fact that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2006 (HC)

Biyar Rubber (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(Kar)191; ILR2007KAR301; [2007]292ITR251(KAR); [2007]292ITR251(Karn)

..... functional and the investment made by the assessee for its acquisition was allowable as investment allowance during the assessment year ending 31-03-1985 as provided by section 32a of the act.6. sri sheshachala, learned counsel for the revenue would contend that in the instant case the assessee had not only miss-lead the ao but had ..... which the (sic) capable of producing yield will be the date relevant for admissibility of the investment allowance as permissible under the provisions of section 32a of the act.11. the word used in section 'first put to use' in the immediate preceding year would indicate that not only putting in place of the machinery or plant but it ..... the plant functional to yield the production.13. we, therefore, are of the opinion that the assessee would be entitled to benefit of investment allowance under section 32a of the act only on proof that the machinery was not only installed but was functional or was capable of being put to use or was capable of producing the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //