Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 10 of about 97 results (0.081 seconds)

Apr 13 2016 (HC)

B. Dilipkumar Vs. The Secretary to Government Department and Another

Court : Chennai

..... 5.2013priyanga (20), arunthathiyarmoorthy (24), kuyavar205/2013, mallur174 cr.p.c.205.6.2013partipan (21) dalitochammal, caste hindu117/2013, maruvathur302 of ipc and cruelty prohibition act sec. 3(2)(5)2126.6.2013kasthuri (22)siva (23)2010/2013, kirushnagiri302 of ipc2213.9.2013gomathi, caste hindumurugan, dalit110/2013, seelaperi302 of ipc23 sathiyapriya, hindusuntharesan, ..... no attempt to compel adult couples to return to their parents, if any one among the couples apprehends physical harm. the police must keep an army of " friends of people" from amongst progressive minded people in every village or group of villages, where honour killings have been rampant, to ..... paraiyarbhuvaneshwari, kongu vellalar156/2014, chottapattiv/s, 17(g)4310.12.2014amirthavalli, dalitpalaniyappan, vanniyar216/2014, kottur302 of ipc and cruelty prohibition act sec.3(2)(5)44..sathyabama, mbcragunath, kongu vellalar155/2014,sithodu302 of ipc45......221/2014, bhuvanagirisec.109, 120(b), 201, 302 of ipc, sc/st .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2016 (HC)

K. Ganesh Vs. C. Arasukumar

Court : Chennai

..... .04.2015. at that time only, the petitioner/accused had constrained to file the crl.m.p.no.1284 of 2015 before the trial court (under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872). 7. the prime contention advanced on behalf of the respondent/complainant is that the petitioner/accused had admitted the execution of the cheque in the ..... 122 days in filing the criminal revision in sr.5074 of 2016. 2. according to the petitioner/accused, the respondent/complainant had filed a petition under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act by using forged documents and further, the respondent/complainant had failed to explain the different signatures in ex.p1/pro-note etc. 3. the stand of ..... petitioner/accused is that he filed a petition in crl.mp.no.1284 of 2015 on the file of the trial court under section 293 of the criminal procedure code and also under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872, seeking an expert opinion. the trial court had ultimately dismissed the crl.m.p.no.1284 of 2015 in c.c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2016 (HC)

K. Nagarajan Vs. C. Arasukumar

Court : Chennai

..... .04.2015. at that time only, the petitioner/accused had constrained to file the crl.m.p.no.1285 of 2015 before the trial court (under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872). 7. the prime contention advanced on behalf of the respondent/complainant is that the petitioner/accused had admitted the execution of the cheque in the ..... 122 days in filing the criminal revision in sr.5081 of 2016. 2. according to the petitioner/accused, the respondent/complainant had filed a petition under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act by using forged documents and further, the respondent/complainant had failed to explain the different signatures in ex.p1/pro-note etc. 3. the stand of ..... petitioner/accused is that he filed a petition in crl.mp.no.1285 of 2015 on the file of the trial court under section 293 of the criminal procedure code and also under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872, seeking an expert opinion. the trial court had ultimately dismissed the crl.m.p.no.1285 of 2015 in c.c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2016 (HC)

G. Janaki and Others Vs. C. Arasukumar and Others

Court : Chennai

..... .04.2015. at that time only, the petitioner/accused had constrained to file the crl.m.p.no.1285 of 2015 before the trial court (under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872). 7. the prime contention advanced on behalf of the respondent/complainant is that the petitioner/accused had admitted the execution of the cheque in the ..... 122 days in filing the criminal revision in sr.5072 of 2016. 2. according to the petitioner/accused, the respondent/complainant had filed a petition under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act by using forged documents and further, the respondent/complainant had failed to explain the different signatures in ex.p1/pro-note etc. 3. the stand of ..... petitioner/accused is that he filed a petition in crl.mp.no.1285 of 2015 on the file of the trial court under section 293 of the criminal procedure code and also under section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872, seeking an expert opinion. the trial court had ultimately dismissed the crl.m.p.no.1285 of 2015 in c.c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2016 (HC)

M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. P. Arunachalam and Others

Court : Chennai

..... parliament. accordingly, we direct the central government to do so immediately. till such amendment is made by the central government in exercise of power vested under sub-section (3) of section 163a of act, 1988 or amendment is made by the parliament, we hold and direct that for children upto the age of 5 years shall be entitled for fixed compensation of ..... and fifty thousand) or the amount may be determined in terms of second schedule whichever is higher. such amount is to be paid if any application is filed under section 163a of the act, 1988.(iii) a decision of this court in the case of new india assurance co. ltd. vs. k.jothilingam and others (2011 acj 333) 23. now ..... of the deceased from the two-wheeler even as per the fir vide ex.p1 and the evidence of p.w.2, the claim petition filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act is not maintainable and it ought to have been dismissed by the tribunal. he would further contend that the tribunal ought to have reduced the compensation under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2016 (HC)

Rajiv Gandhi ONGC (Con) Workers Welfare Association, rep. By its Gener ...

Court : Chennai

..... co. belong to this category of cases. 13. in the instant case we are concerned with the question whether the workmen concerned were entitled to retrenchment compensation under section 25-f of the act as on the date of the award and payment of back wages from 31-10-1971 to 20-3-1980. this question depends upon their right to be ..... the company on 30-10-1971 before the closure could become effective. the one and the only ground on which the claim of the workmen for compensation under section 25-fff of the act was rejected was that the workmen had ceased to be employees of the appellant by reason of the notice of discharge dated 30-10-1971. the validity of ..... modified by change in the circumstances on which they were based, both the purposes of the legislature would be served. that is the view taken by the tribunals themselves in army and navy stores ltd., bombay v. workmen and ford motor co. of india ltd. v. workmen and we are of opinion that they lay down the correct principle, and that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2016 (HC)

Michael Hart Vs. M/s. Ninestars Information Technologies Ltd., Represe ...

Court : Chennai

..... after that proposal made by the respondent, no payment was made to the petitioner. consequently, statutory notice was issued to the petitioner on 15.08.2008 under section 434 of the companies act. despite the said notice, the respondent neither replied to the same nor paid the money. hence, the present company petition. 4. counter affidavit is filed by ..... . it is not in doubt that an e-mail, dated 1.4.2008, had been sent by the respondent company, acknowledging its debts, as required under section 18 of the limitation act, 1963. as the acknowledgement of debt had been made by the respondent company, before the limitation period of three years from 31.10.2005 was over, a ..... for collecting the debt and on the other hand, only to wind up the company which has failed to pay the admitted debt/liability, as contemplated under section 433(e) of the companies act, 1956, i do not think that the above decisions of the apex court will help the respondent company in any manner. 18. further, the conduct .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2016 (HC)

State Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Hindu Religious and Vs. Ras ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the right conferred under articles 25 and 26 of the constitution of india is not limited to matters of doctrines or beliefs, but to extend to the acts done in pursuance of religion and therefore, the guarantee of rituals, ceremonies and modes of worship are integral parts of religion. but, however, about what ..... or injury. while all offences under the indian penal code become offences after commission of an act, one offence, namely an attempt to commit suicide, which when actually committed successfully, cannot be prosecuted. but, the very attempt to commit it is prosecutable. ..... festival and it was observed as follows:- even if there is a likelihood of a person making an indecent representation, the same is prohibited by the said act. it is needless to point out that the likelihood of depravation, corruption or injury to public morality stands on a different footing than the actual depravation, corruption .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2016 (HC)

State Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Hindu Religious and Charita ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the right conferred under articles 25 and 26 of the constitution of india is not limited to matters of doctrines or beliefs, but to extend to the acts done in pursuance of religion and therefore, the guarantee of rituals, ceremonies and modes of worship are integral parts of religion. but, however, about what ..... or injury. while all offences under the indian penal code become offences after commission of an act, one offence, namely an attempt to commit suicide, which when actually committed successfully, cannot be prosecuted. but, the very attempt to commit it is prosecutable. ..... festival and it was observed as follows:- even if there is a likelihood of a person making an indecent representation, the same is prohibited by the said act. it is needless to point out that the likelihood of depravation, corruption or injury to public morality stands on a different footing than the actual depravation, corruption .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

South Indian Music Companies Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

..... complaints of importation of infringing copies. an appeal memorandum is prescribed to the copyright board against the orders of the registrar of copyrights. 4. section 6 of the copyright act deals with a reference to be made to the copyright board qua certain disputes. it further enables the board to decide disputes regarding ''term of ..... the intellectual property appellate board. it is also not a substitute for the high court. there is nothing wrong in the constitution of the board. section 11 of the act is constitutionally valid. the appointment of the chairman is made with the consultation of the chief justice of india. the word ''consultation'' can be taken ..... view that the provisions, as they stand now, do not exhibit any such violation. there is no dispute that the board performs its judicial functions. under section 11 of the act, the chairman is appointed, though by the government, but ''in consultation with the chief justice of india''. the definition of the word ''consultation'' has .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //