Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Sorted by: old Year: 2011 Page 2 of about 25 results (0.101 seconds)

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory S. Nagara ...

Court : Karnataka

..... ground of delay. it is for the petitioners to seek the stay of the reassessment orders after complying with the provisions contained in section 62(4) of the vat act and section 20 of the 1957 act, as the case may be. 71. in the fitness of the things, this court directs the respondents not to resort to ..... , the high courts will issue appropriate order or directions to prevent such consequences. writ of certiorari and prohibition can issue against the income tax officer acting without jurisdiction under section 34, income tax act. 6. sri venkataraman has also relied on the apex courts judgment in the case of raza textiles ltd. v. income tax officer, rampur ..... of these writ petitions. he submits that these petitions are to be rejected relegating the petitioners to the statutory appeal remedy provided by section 62 of the vat act and/or by section 20 of the kst act. 3. sri. n. venkataraman, the learned senior counsel appearing for m/s. harish and company for the petitioners (m/s. .....

Enkon Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... of information and cultural affairs, government of west bengal, and the respondent no.3 is the kolkata metropolitan development authority, a body corporate constituted under section 3 of the kolkata metropolitan development authority act, 1972.2) on october 25, 2005, the respondent no.2 issued an advertisement inviting tenders from the experienced agencies for installation and maintenance of ..... waiver means abandonment of a right and it may be either expressed or implied from conduct, but its basic requirement is that it must be an intentional act with knowledge. there can be no waiver unless the person who is said to have waived is fully informed as to his right and with full knowledge of ..... 3. the following facts have been established from the materials placed before us by the parties:1) the appellant no.1 is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 and the appellant no.2 is one of its directors. the respondent no.1 is the state of west bengal represented by the respondent no.2 .....

Gardihewa Sarath C. Fonseka Vs. Dhammika Kithulegoda and Others

Court : Sri Lanka Supreme Court

..... (1) of the evidence ordinance presumes a court martial to be a court and the rules of evidence applicable in a civil court also apply to courts martial (vide section 81 of the army act); 9. the confirming authoritys role of giving validity? to the conviction and sentence passed by the court martial, is a protective measure for the benefit of the accused ..... the last tribunal was an arbitrator to whom the dispute was referred by the commissioner of labour under section 3 (1) of the act. sansoni c.j. observed that the industrial disputes act no 43 of 1950, part iii provided for collective agreements, and settlements by conciliation and arbitration and part iv for the constitution industrial courts, from a panel appointed by the governor .....

Gangeshwar Baitha (Ex-havilder) Vs. Union of India , Service Through t ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kolkata

..... decision the honble delhi high court took into consideration the pension regulation. it was observed by the honble judges that court martial authority as per section 71 of the army act 1950 has enough power to pass a sentence of forfeiture of pension amount of a person who was found guilty. since no such order was passed ..... order, the authority was not authorised to forfeit the pensionary benefits to which the petitioner was entitled. we have taken into consideration the provision of section 71 of the army act 1950 wherein in sub-rule (h) it has been provided that the court martial authority has the power of directing forfeiture of service for the purpose ..... affidavit-in-opposition wherein the claim of the petitioner was denied on material points. according to the respondents since the petitioner was dismissed from service under the army act he is not entitled to get pension and gratuity as per pension regulation 1962. however, in an exceptional case the president of india may sanction such .....

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

..... nb sub dharampal and others, have filed an original application before this tribunal under sec. 14 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 praying for grant of pension of the rank of naib subedar. 2. brief facts of the case are that all the four applicants retired from army on completion of normal terms of service as havaldar and are being paid pension ..... pension only. accordingly, additional element of pension of rs.100/- p.m. payable to havaldars granted hony rank of naib subedar as per regn.137 of pension regulations for the army part-i (1961) amended vide this ministrys letter no.1(1)/88/d(pen/sers) dated 6.11.1991 will cease to be payable. the notional fixation of pay in .....

State Vs. Ramesh and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... both the respondents. the respondents were charged for offences punishable under sections 186/353/332/451/341 ipc. the prosecution in support of their case examined 10 witnesses of whom material witnesses are pw2, the then acp kewal singh, ..... many police officials reached there and rescued the dcp, traffic. pw9, sh. neeraj kumar, the dcp traffic on 30th april, 1985 accorded the sanction for prosecution under section 195 cr.p.c. on the same day fir was registered on the complaint of hc kishore lal, pw 6 and after investigation the police filed charge sheet against ..... noise, he went inside and saw people were sitting and there were heated arguments. the chairs were not lying scattered. thus there was neither any restrain nor any act to constitute the offence of criminal trespass on part of the respondents.4. pw5 ahsaan ullah sidiqui, inspector, traffic in his testimony had stated that his office .....

Phool Chand Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

..... the applicant was subjected to administrative action under section 20 of the army act read with rule 17 of the army rules. since the court martial proceedings could not attain finality, the applicant cannot be absolved from ..... the ndps act for having found in possession of 40 kg. contraband (ghanja). having gone through the entire record of the case, we find that it is true that after passing of the order by the court martial, that order was neither rejected nor confirmed by the competent authority under section 153 of the army act but ..... was not confirmed by the confirming authority and hence, that finding has not attained its validity and as such, a person committing cognizable offence under the ndps act cannot be allowed to go scot free. the tribunal ordered that the applicant be taken into custody for facing a criminal trial before a competent criminal .....

Ghisalal, and Dhapubai (Dead) Widow of Gopalji. Vs. Dhapubai (Dead) by ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of wife can be inferred from the circumstances. the learned single judge noted that the adoption deed was duly registered and held that in view of section 16 of the 1956 act, a presumption can be raised that the adoption had been made after complying with the relevant provisions. the learned single judge then observed that dhapubai had ..... , the wife cannot adopt even with the consent of the husband whereas the husband can adopt with the consent of the wife. this is clear from section 7 of the act. proviso thereof makes it clear that a male hindu cannot adopt except with the consent of the wife, unless the wife has completely and finally renounced ..... be made basis for assuming that she had willingly consented to the adoption of ghisalal by gopalji. he submitted that the consent contemplated by the proviso to section 7 of the 1956 act is mandatory and unless the consent of the wife is proved, the adoption cannot be treated valid. in support of this argument, shri majithia placed .....

The Divisional Railway Manager Vs. Presiding Officer and ors .

Court : Chennai

..... a contract, yet, when the order terminating the services of the petitioner contained allegations, the same would not fall for consideration under section 2(oo) of the industrial disputes act, attracting section 25f of the act. a reading of the proceedings thus would show that the order of termination was punitive in character. rightly, the petitioner took ..... on its expiry or contract being terminated under a stipulation in their behalf contained therein, is not a retrenchment within the meaning of section 2(oo) of the industrial disputes act. section 25f states that no workman who had put in a continuous service for not less than one year, shall be retrenched by the ..... petitioner was directed to collect a compensation of rs.1,324/- and rs.1,986/- purported to be notice pay and compensation as per section section 25f of the industrial disputes act. aggrieved by the said order and that the termination was contrary to rule 9 of the railway servants (discipline and appeal) rules and violative .....

Major Man Mohan Singh Battu Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... be recorded which resulted in the petitioner being finally tried summarily under section 84 of the army act.2. the charge sheet framed against the petitioner listed 4 articles of charge as under:-first an act prejudicial to good order charge and military discipline, army actsection 63 in that he, at-field, between 09 may and 30 ..... mahar regiment in theoperation of unauthorized non csdprivate account by signing daily sale summaries of non csd items duringthe said period.second an act prejudicial to good order charge and military discipline army actsection 63 in that he, at-field, between 19 feb and 04 sep83, when second-in-command 2mahar regiment, improperly aidedic ..... then commandingofficer 2 mahar regiment in stocking of unauthorized goods for sale in unit canteen contrary to army order355/71 which forbade stocking of non csd stores in canteens.third an act prejudicial to good order charge and military discipline, army actsection 63 in that he, at field, on 20 jul 83, when second-in- command .....