Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Sorted by: old Year: 1954 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.046 seconds)

Jan 19 1954 (HC)

K.K. Verma and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-1954

Reported in : AIR1954Bom358; (1954)56BOMLR308; ILR1954Bom950

..... j. 1. this is an appeal from a judgment of mr. justice desai and it raises a very short question as to the interpretation of section 3 of the government premises (eviction) act, 1950, being act no. 27 of 1950. it is necessary to state only a few facts in order to understand and appreciate the legal arguments that are advanced before us.2. the ..... under instructions from the ministry of defence on the basis that he was a dependant of an army officer and was a displaced person. it is not in dispute that a contractual monthly tenancy was created between the union of india, which is the owner of these premises, ..... respondent is a displaced person and he has a son in the army and a flat which is situated at dhobi talao was given to him .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1954 (HC)

The State Vs. Vikar Ahmed and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-1954

Reported in : 1954CriLJ1281

..... borne by them. it seeks to attribute communal motive to the notifications and alleges it to have been made with the object of adversely affecting a particular section.indeed, the article alleges the notifications to have been issued in disregard of the constitutional guarantees of secularism, and to be doing injustice by those who ..... fair criticism, are conceived by irresponsible appreciation] of the action, dictated or calculated to lower the sense of confidence in the administration of justice by attributing sectional prejudices to the judges, and holding them out as issuing directions in matters of judicial proceeding on considerations other than judicial, and attributing to the court ..... has been permitted under the hyderabad (language of judgments and orders) act (29 of 1950), by notification of the government, no. jud/ad/99/51 of 5-4-1951 issued under section 138(1) civil p. c. it will be observed that the act and notifications were passed and issued long before the present hon'ble .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1954 (HC)

Mrs. Avril Ellen Smith Vs. Reginald Frank Smith

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-05-1954

Reported in : AIR1954All624

..... . vi c. 13) came into force. by section 17(1) of this act the jurisdiction of indian courts to pass decree for dissolution of marriage under the indian and colonial divorce jurisdiction act in petitions presented after the aforesaid date was completely taken away. the indian independence act was repealed on 26-1-1950, when the constitution came into force,12. if ..... the wife's domicile always follows that of her husband. the respondent came out to india about thirty years ago. he was formerly a warrant officer in the army but later on he gave up that service and took up employment with the railways. at the time of his marriage with the petitioner in ..... , reference may also be made to the indian matrimonial causes (war marriages) act (xl of 1948). although the respondent, was, at one time, a warrant officer in the army, this act does not apply to the present case because (1) the respondent had ceased to belong to the army before his marriage and (2) the marriage was not solemnised during the ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1954 (HC)

Arun Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Ashutosh Guha

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-26-1954

Reported in : AIR1955Cal368,1955CriLJ943,58CWN558

..... ' or highhandedness or zubberdastism', whatever be the exact words used, it amounted to contempt of the court.2. when a magistrate acts under section 144 of the code of criminal procedure he clearly acts as a judicial officer. it is to be remembered, however, that in this province the same magistrate also exercises executive functions. as ..... magistrate had while arguing a case in the court of the local munsif put forward a copy of the magistrate's order under section 144, criminal p. c., and called it an act of 'executive goondaism' of the sub-divisional magistrate.after a report was obtained from the learned munsif, guha and guha ray jj ..... public peace is essentially a duty of the executive authorities one can well understand the act of the sub-divisional magistrate under section 144, criminal p. c., being considered to have been performed from the executive standpoint though in essence a judicial act.in deciding whether characterisation of action of this kind as 'executive goondaism' or ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1954 (HC)

Pannalal Lahoti Vs. State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-1954

Reported in : 1954CriLJ1093

..... was applied by the supreme court. the supreme court had to consider the scope of 'the sholapur weaving and spinning company' (emergency provisions) ordinance 2 of 1950. mahajan j., as he then was, who delivered the judgment of the supreme court observed:in order to decide these issues it is necessary to examine with some ..... life of the community.then in the various clauses of sub-section (2), which enumerates specific heads on which rules can be framed, a large number relate to army, defence and war efforts. sub-clause (4) refers to enemy and authorises framing of rules against acts likely to assist the enemy or prejudice the successful conduct of ..... course of the war and existing in the transition from war to peace. accordingly the defence (transitional powers) act 1946-49, to the extent to which it purported to continue the regulations in force until 31st december, 1950, is not authorised by the defence power and is invalid.their lordships further observed; what provided the constitutional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1954 (HC)

Jamini Kanta Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-1954

Reported in : AIR1955Cal45,58CWN936

..... actually been enrolled on terms different from those which are contained in the regulations.34. on the conclusion reached by us that though not in terms of section 10, indian army act, yet on the principles underlying the same as also on equitable grounds which find an echo in the circular letter issued from allahabad the plaintiff is entitled ..... was away from the station on that date, signed the paper on 19-3-1942, after his return. the enrolment was, therefore, completed in terms of section 9, indian army act, on 19-3-1942. the learned subordinate judge also came to the same conclusion, though we need not refer to or express our agreement with all the ..... is satisfied about certain particulars, and a form is signed by the person desirous of being enrolled, that the enrolling officer also signs the form, and under section 9, indian army act. 'the person shall then be deemed to be enrolled'. from the papers placed before us it is manifest that though the plaintiff had appeared before mr. uddin .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1954 (HC)

Mst. Reoti Devi Vs. Pt. Bhagwan Dayal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-1954

Reported in : AIR1954All801

..... a half share in the said village as the widow of a separated hindu. in that suit, the issue sent down by the revenue court under the provisions of section 271, agra tenancy act, 1926, 'whether the defendant was proprietor of a half share in chaoli' was answered in smt. revti's favour by the learned munsif,a decree had been passed ..... revenue court is still a court of exclusive jurisdiction. moreover, a civil court, when it is dealing with an issue sent by the revenue court to it under section 271, agra tenancy act 3 of 1926, does not really function as a normal original civil court. the issue is decided by it not as a result of any plaint being presented to ..... persons or, at any rate, of raghubar dayal and bhagwan dayal or did they have separate interests in the same?kashi ram, plaintiff's uncle, took up service in the army in the first instance. he was there for four or six years after the mutiny of 1857. then he joined the police which service he left sometime between 1884 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1954 (FN)

United States Vs. Gilman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-17-1954

..... employment, under circumstances where the united states, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." "sec. 2674. the united states shall be liable, respecting the provisions of this title relating to tort claims, in the same manner and to the same extent ..... s. 513 appraised. that function is more appropriately for those who write the laws, rather than for those who interpret them. affirmed. [ footnote 1 ] the act provides in pertinent part as follows: "sec. 1346. (b) subject to the provisions of chapter 171 of this title, the district courts, together with the district court for the territory of alaska, the ..... standard oil co., 332 u. s. 301 , where the united states sued the owner and driver of a truck for the negligent injury of a soldier in the army of the united states, claiming damages for loss of the soldier's service during the period of his disability. we were asked to extend the common law action of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1954 (SC)

In Re: Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-1954

Reported in : 1954(2)BLJR477; (1954)56BOMLR1220; [1955]1SCR490

..... court is expected at all times to comport himself in a manner befitting his status as an 'officer and a gentleman.' in the army it is a military offence to do otherwise (see section 45 of the army act, 1950) though no notice would be taken of ungentlemanly conduct under the ordinary law of the land, and none in the case of a ..... and so render himself liable to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this court.' 18. mr. g argued that even if this was once the law, section 3 of the legal practitioners (fees) act, 1926, (act xxi of 1926) changed it and that now every legal practitioner is competent to settle the terms of his engagement and his fees by private agreement ..... . on this being reported to the high court the matter was referred to the bombay bar council and was investigated by three of its members under section 11(1) of the bar councils act. they recorded their opinion that this amounted to professional misconduct. the high court agreed and suspended mr. g from practice as an advocate of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1954 (FN)

New Jersey Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-07-1954

..... prior to july 1, 1955, repeal chapter 443 of the new jersey laws of 1953, and if, when the commonwealth of pennsylvania accepts the conditions as specified in section 19 of that chapter, the state of new jersey shall join with the commonwealth of pennsylvania in requesting the consent of congress to the agreement embodied in chapter 443 of ..... and the city of new york. d. replacement. in the event that, for any reason, the chief hydraulic engineer of the u.s.g.s. or his designee cannot act as river master, this court will, on motion of any party, appoint a river master and fix his compensation. viii. no prior appropriation nor apportionment. no diversion herein allowed ..... authority of congress in respect to commerce on navigable waters of the united states, and it is subject to the powers of the secretary of the army and chief of engineers of the united states army in respect to commerce on navigable waters of the united states. page 347 u. s. 1005 x. retention of jurisdiction; no estoppel. any .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //