Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-24-1953
Reported in : AIR1954HP6
..... court, and a subsequent application to implead mm was rejected. the appeal was dismissed.4. there was no argument before me on the question of the notice under section 80, civil p. c. the order of the district judge rejecting the plaintiffs appellants' application to implead kanthu defendant as respondent in that court was questioned in the ..... century by the french jurist ernst roguih in his la science juridique pure, as pointed out by julius stone in his 'the province and function of law', second (1950) edition, at page 86. roguin took to task austin for his assertion that the sovereign cannot have rights and duties. the argument adopted by austin and others ..... broken down, possession was taken of the premises under the defence of the realm acts and regulations made thereunder. a. petition of right was brought against the crown claiming compensation as a matter of right for the use of the hotel by the army authorities. it was argued for the crown that there was a prerogative to take .....
Tag this Judgment!