Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Court: central administrative tribunal cat mumbai Year: 2002

Omprakash Dukhilal Yadav and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)(3)SLJ370CAT

..... writ petition no. 968, 1295 to 1306 of 99 wherein in a case of military farm which was managed by indian army on the outskirts of bangalore when retrenchment compensation under section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 was paid to casually employed persons since 3 to 9 years, having regard to the volume of production, it ..... .1998. o.a. no. 810/98 decided on 28.9.1998, it is hereby held that when the applicant has received retrenchment compensation under section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and retrenchment became essential on account of the fact that a policy decision has been taken to reduce the number of casual labourers, the ..... exchange.29. 1999 scc (l&s) 1420 - excise suptd. mallikapattam krishna dist.a.p. v. k.b. vishnu sharma and ors. wherein section 4(1) of employment exchanges (compulsory notification) act, 1959 was subject of consideration and it was held that in addition to the requisitioning the names from the employment exchange, names should also be called .....