Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Year: 2002

Ramesh Chandra Mathur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ331CAT

..... of the ministry of finance (department of expenditure) (defence division), paid out of the defence services estimates and not permanently subject to the air force act, 1950 or the army act,1950 or the navy act, 1957. relevant portion of rule 9( 1) of the pension rules reads as follows: (1) the president reserves to himself the right of ..... learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondents have passed a final order of punishment against the applicant dated 22.5.1995 by which the president acting as the disciplinary authority had imposed the penalty of 25% cut in pension payable to the applicant for a period of five years with immediate effect. however ..... his report has considered the relevant evidence and has come to the conclusion that the charge stood established and that the applicant has failed to maintain integrity and acted in a manner unbecoming of a government servant, thus violating the provisions of rules 3 and 4 of the ccs (conduct) rules, 1964. we have .....