Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Court: allahabad Page 8 of about 72 results (0.060 seconds)

Jul 03 1928 (PC)

Misri Lal Vs. Gopi Charan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All538

..... only in such cases that are relevant for the purposes of the present appeal.47. before referring to them i would examine the provisions of the tenancy act, itself. section 167, act 2, 1901 consists of two parts. the first part directs thatall suits and applications of the nature specified in schedule 4 shall be heard and determined by ..... approved of by this court in birham khusal v. sumera [1913] 35 all. 299 at p 301;section 95, tenancy act, is hardly the section under which to proceed.31. as regards the second point: the appellant argued that it was sufficient for the plaintiffs to claim to be in possession ..... argument of the appellant on both points, for he argued (and my learned brother has accepted the argument on p. 3 of his judgment), that section 95, tenancy act, was the proper section under which to decide these questions such as legitimacy or the validity of a deed of relinquishment. the decision of the commissioner on this point was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1986 (HC)

Lakhmir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1987CriLJ421

..... the facts and circumstances of the case, discussed above, we are of the view that the detaining authority was rightly satisfied in passing the order under section 3 of the act for the detention of the petitioner in the prison with a view to prevent him from indulging in smuggling in future.34. in conclusion, we find ..... detention arrived at by the authorities, the order of detention could not be held to be invalid for non-consideration of the retraction. the court reterred to section 5-a of the act and observed (in para 74) that: -.the same argument was presented in a little different shade namely the fact of retraction should have been considered' ..... 23. in raisuddin v. state of u.p. : 1983crilj1785 a grievance was made before the supreme court that a representation made by the detenu under section 8 of the national security act, 1980 had been disposed of with inordinate delay which rendered the order of detention bad. the representation was received in the office of the district magistrate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1999 (HC)

Jogender Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(All)218

..... not at all attracted in the present case. similarly, mr. govind krishna, learned counsel for the respondents is not right in invoking s. 221 of the act. sec. 221 of the act, provides for levy of penalty when tax is in default. it is not the case of the respondent that any penalty upon the petitioner has been imposed or the ..... which relates to notice of demand specifically refers to tax, interest, penalty, fine or any other sum payable in consequence of any order passed under the act. likewise, various sections contained in chapter xxi of the act, which deals with penalties, provides for imposition of penalty in addition to any tax payable by the assessee. thus, according to him, tax and penalty ..... is liable to pay the said amount as the same has been imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the act, and the provision of s. 221 are fully attracted in the present case.11. sec. 2(43) of the act defines tax as follows :'2(43).'tax' in relation to the assessment year commencing on the lst day of april, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1999 (HC)

Jogender Singh Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2000]246ITR269(All); [1999]107TAXMAN394(All)

..... and interest deposited by the firm in consequence of the order passed by the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) as also giving the clearance certificate under section 230a of the act, to the partners of the said firm enabling them to sell their properties when the amount of penalty assessed against the firm was outstanding, the ..... to notice of demand specifically refers to tax, interest, penalty, fine or any other sum payable in consequence of any order passed under the act. likewise, various sections contained in chapter xxi of the act, which deals with penalties, provide for imposition of penalty in addition to any tax payable by the assessee. thus, according to him, tax ..... its partners for a liability to the extent of rs. 1,00,559. the fact of the applying and obtaining of income-tax clearance certificate under section 230a of the act, by the partners of the said firm, according to the respondents, is not relevant, and therefore, the recovery proceeding's for the realisation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1938 (PC)

Jagan Nath Brijraj Oil Mill Cawnpore Through Kalu Ram Vs. Soembar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1939All29

..... performance of his duty as linedar which deprived him of the use of the index and middle fingers of the loft hand. soembar made an application under section 4 of act 8 of 1923 to the commissioner of labour, cawnpore. the application was contested on several grounds but the commissioner, upon a consideration of evidence, allowed the ..... in hospital. the commissioner further allowed the applicant rs. 30 pleader's fee. the opposite party has now come to this court in appeal. under section 30 of the act an appeal shall lie to the high court only in certain specified cases provided that a substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. learned counsel ..... injury to one limb has caused additional incapacity which would entitle the labourer to claim compensation for total loss to some other member of limb. the definition in section 2(g) of 'partial disablement' indicates that the earning capacity of the labourer will be reduced in every employment which he was capable of undertaking at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1924 (PC)

Raghubar Dayal and anr. Vs. Secretary of State for India

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1924All415; 78Ind.Cas.642

..... such an interest in the property in dispute as would entitle him to maintain a suit for declaration under section 42 of the specific relief act.14. and, clearly, if the relations between the parties are governed by the army regulations the plaintiff had a cause of action for it is plain that the transfer to the second defendant ..... 179, dated the 12th september 1836 and these rules were re-published from time to time with amendments and variations till they assumed their present shape in army regulations, india, 1887, section 17 (see page 394 of the gazette of india, part v of the 5th november 1898.)39. the general order of 1836 imposed practically the same ..... the transfer in question were duly entered in the register of houses which fact in a way implies the sanction of the military authorities.57. under section 56 of the indian easements act a license as such cannot be transferred. it is clear, therefore, that the legal effect of the past sanctions was simply to continue the license .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2010 (HC)

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... central government may, by notification, appoint. section 2 deals with applicability of the act, sub-section (1) of section 2 provides that the provisions of this act would apply to the persons who are subject to the army act, 1950, navy act, 1957 and the air force act, 1950. it will also apply to the retired army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors ..... availed of all the remedies available to him under the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950) and respective rules and regulations--(a) if a final ..... had availed of the remedies available to him under the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950) as the case may be, and respective rules and regulations made thereunder.(2) for the purposes of sub-section (1), a person shall be deemed to have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1984 (HC)

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Allahabad and Etc. Vs. Km. Deep ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1985All197

..... look to the circumstances of each case, and no inflexible rule of equity, justice or fairplay can be said to govern all cases. the tribunal under section 110b of the motor vehicles act, 1939 is only called upon to determine the amount of compensation which appears to be just and there may be, cases where justice demands that the ..... . he complained of constant body-ache, headache and bone swelling on account of which it was felt by the superior officers that he should seek retirement from the army or else get treated so that his physical handicaps did not come in his way for future promotion. he was cautioned that unless the above handicaps could be overcome ..... to be struck down.11. the following points arise for consideration :(1) whether the accident in question took place as a result of the rash and negligent driving of army truck or the corporation bus. (2) who was driving the corporation bus at the time of the accident and the consequences thereof. (3) what just compensation has to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1984 (HC)

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Deepti, Minor D/O Major I.D. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1(1985)ACC298

..... look to the circumstances of each case, and no inflexible rule of equity, justice or fairplay can be said to govern all cases. the tribunal under section 110-b of the motor vehicles act, 1939 is only called upon to determine the amount of compensation which appears to be just and there may be cases where justice demands that the ..... are two types of substantive promotions to the rank of lt. col. one by selection and other by time scale after completion of 24 years reckonable commissioned service. the army service corps list shown to us reveals that the date of birth of major gandhi is 22-3-1934. accordingly his retirement completing 52 years of age would fall ..... to be struck down.11. the following points arise for consideration :(1) whether the accident in question too place as a result of the rash and negligent driving of army truck or the corporation bus.(2) who was driving the corporation bus at the time of the accident and the consequences thereof.(3) what just compensation has to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1924 (PC)

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Raghubar Dayal and anr ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1924)ILR46All427

..... not such an interest in the property in dispute as would entitle him to maintain a suit for declaration under section 42 of the specific belief act.15. and, clearly, if the relations between the parties are governed by the army regulations, the plaintiff had a cause of action, for it is plain that the transfer to the second ..... dated the 12th of september, 1836, and these rules were, re-published from time to time with amendments and variations till they assumed their present shape in army regulations, india, 1887, section 17 (see page 394 of the gazette of india, part v, of the 5th of november, 1898).40. the general order of 1836 imposed practically the same ..... the transfer in question were duly entered in the register of houses, which fact in a way implies the sanction of the military authorities.58. under section 56 of the indian easements act a licence as such cannot be transferred. it is clear, therefore, that the legal effect of the past sanctions was simply to continue the licence .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //