Court : Karnataka
..... pending, neither the son nor the daughter-in-law can be evicted from the premises. while assailing the order of the tribunal under section 23 read with section 5 of senior citizens act, 2007 learned senior counsel would point out that there is no question of transfer of a property and therefore, the tribunal has no ..... according to them, various high courts, including bombay, have consistently upheld 18(2020) 3 scc1419(2022) scc online mad 5435 40 the maintainability of section 482 petitions against d.v. act, 2005 proceedings.34. in considering the arguments presented, this court has given careful consideration to the facts and legal principles at hand. it finds ..... authority and anilkumar 12 (son) was directed to handover vacant possession to the father.4. challenging the order passed by the assistant commissioner under sections 5 and 23 of d.v.act, 2005 calling upon the son to handover vacant possession, two petitions are filed before this court. anilkumar (son) assailing the eviction order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pending, neither the son nor the daughter-in-law can be evicted from the premises. while assailing the order of the tribunal under section 23 read with section 5 of senior citizens act, 2007 learned senior counsel would point out that there is no question of transfer of a property and therefore, the tribunal has no ..... according to them, various high courts, including bombay, have consistently upheld 18(2020) 3 scc1419(2022) scc online mad 5435 40 the maintainability of section 482 petitions against d.v. act, 2005 proceedings.34. in considering the arguments presented, this court has given careful consideration to the facts and legal principles at hand. it finds ..... authority and anilkumar 12 (son) was directed to handover vacant possession to the father.4. challenging the order passed by the assistant commissioner under sections 5 and 23 of d.v.act, 2005 calling upon the son to handover vacant possession, two petitions are filed before this court. anilkumar (son) assailing the eviction order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pending, neither the son nor the daughter-in-law can be evicted from the premises. while assailing the order of the tribunal under section 23 read with section 5 of senior citizens act, 2007 learned senior counsel would point out that there is no question of transfer of a property and therefore, the tribunal has no ..... according to them, various high courts, including bombay, have consistently upheld 18(2020) 3 scc1419(2022) scc online mad 5435 40 the maintainability of section 482 petitions against d.v. act, 2005 proceedings.34. in considering the arguments presented, this court has given careful consideration to the facts and legal principles at hand. it finds ..... authority and anilkumar 12 (son) was directed to handover vacant possession to the father.4. challenging the order passed by the assistant commissioner under sections 5 and 23 of d.v.act, 2005 calling upon the son to handover vacant possession, two petitions are filed before this court. anilkumar (son) assailing the eviction order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pending, neither the son nor the daughter-in-law can be evicted from the premises. while assailing the order of the tribunal under section 23 read with section 5 of senior citizens act, 2007 learned senior counsel would point out that there is no question of transfer of a property and therefore, the tribunal has no ..... according to them, various high courts, including bombay, have consistently upheld 18(2020) 3 scc1419(2022) scc online mad 5435 40 the maintainability of section 482 petitions against d.v. act, 2005 proceedings.34. in considering the arguments presented, this court has given careful consideration to the facts and legal principles at hand. it finds ..... authority and anilkumar 12 (son) was directed to handover vacant possession to the father.4. challenging the order passed by the assistant commissioner under sections 5 and 23 of d.v.act, 2005 calling upon the son to handover vacant possession, two petitions are filed before this court. anilkumar (son) assailing the eviction order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... in determining the quantum of compensation 22. firstly, it may be refreshed that for the purpose of evaluating compensation for the acquired land, section 23(1) of the 1894 act, acts as a lighthouse. it stipulates that:- 23. matters to be considered in determining compensation. (1) in determining the amount of compensation to ..... determined at inr110per sq. yd.5. following the award, several landowners made a reference before the reference court seeking enhancement of compensation under section 18 of the 1894 act. the record indicates two kinds of compensation rates granted by the reference court: first, inr233and second, inr222per square yard. in both these awards ..... yamuna barrage. beyond the southern side, the land is flanked by a six-lane road leading towards delhi through noida, alongside residential enclaves designated for army officers, along with the aforementioned golf course. eastward, there are developed sectors 43 and 45, as well as the lands belonging to village sadarpur. lastly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... in other words, mere acceptance or receipt of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence under section 7 or sections 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii), respectively of the act. therefore, under section 7 of the act, in order to bring home the offence, there must be an offer which emanates from the bribe-giver which is ..... there being any demand from the public servant and the latter simply accepts the offer and receives the illegal gratification, it is a case of acceptance as per section 7 of the act. in such a case, there need not be a prior demand by the public servant. (ii) on the other hand, if the public servant makes ..... ) and accused officer no.2(hereinafter being referred to as ao2 ) were convicted and sentenced as below:- 1 i) offence punishable under section 7 of prevention of corruption act, 1988(hereinafter being referred to as pc act ): rigorous imprisonment of one year and a fine of rs.1,000/- each (in default, simple imprisonment for three months) ii) offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... is established.29. the state of himachal pradesh, respondent 3 in this appeal, is thus empowered to make rules under sub- section (3) of section 23 read with section 38(2)(l) of the 2009 act prescribing the salary and allowances payable to, and the terms and conditions of service of, teachers. article 39(d) of the ..... school education. before independence in 1947, the school was receiving grant-in-aid from the british indian government and thereafter from the government of india up to 1950. between 1951 and 1966, the school received grant-in-aid from the state government of punjab. after the state of himachal pradesh was formed, the school ..... institution was a joint venture of brother of st. gabrial and bengal engineering group benevolent trust. the appellant may be an apex body (society) running the army schools throughout the country, but it cannot escape from the noble idea of creating bengal engineering group benevolent trust for imparting education. service benefits and status of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... followed on returning the plaint is dealt with under sub-section (2) of section 10. order vii rule 10 of the cpc touches upon the jurisdiction of a court to have entertained a suit. the question of jurisdiction cuts at ..... - nc:2024. khc:27019 wp no.8550 of 2024 order vii rule 10 of the cpc permits filing of an application for return of plaint. sub-section (1) of section 10 permits the concerned court to return the plaint to be presented before the court in which the suit should have been instituted. the procedure to be ..... kandaramy. petitioner (by sri anish jose antony, advocate) and:1. annapurna organics pvt. ltd. f2, ashirwad complex, 6th cross, cambridge layout bengaluru-560 008 (registered under companies act) represented by its director alok kumar jhunjhunwala) respondent (by sri manjunath b.s. (suo assts.), advocate) this petition is filed under articles226& 227 of the constitution of india .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... from the inception. a forgery or cheating of this kind if interdicted in the exercise of jurisdiction under section 482 of the cr.p.c. it would be putting a premium on the alleged activities of the petitioners. 910. an act or a fact would give rise to two circumstances one setting civil law into motion and the other ..... criminal law. merely because the issue projected is civil, it is no law that this court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 482 of the cr.p.c. should obliterate the ..... court was exercising the appellate jurisdiction and/or conducting the trial. the high court has exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under section 482 crpc.13. even the high court has erred in observing that original complaint has no locus. the aforesaid observation is made on the premise that the complainant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... date, the lands in respect of which the petitioner-company claimed occupancy rights, stood transferred to and vested in the state government with the consequences mentioned in sub-section 920 of section 44 of the act. we accordingly record and our finding on point no.1. this finding would be sufficient to dismiss writ appeal no.1867 of 1989. (d) to us, ..... of some are bound to be effective one way or the other... the right of the state to have the tenanted land vested in it in terms of section 44(1) of 1961 act, thus has been lost to the advantage of the appellants.-. 36 - w.a. no.4312 of 2017 in the above circumstances, this appeal being meritorious, succeeds; ..... the state by operation of law; appellants are wrong in arguing that these findings do not suffer res judicata since in any claim for occupancy in terms of sec.48a of the 1961 act, only three questions are involved viz., whether land is agricultural, whether it is tenanted and whether it was tenanted as on the cut off date; all these .....
Tag this Judgment!