Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 116 summary court martial Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 13 of about 1,042 results (0.066 seconds)

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt S R Rukmini

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri Dabbagullappa

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Manjula

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri A N Sreekanta

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Lakshmidevamma

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt B R Ramya

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Umadevi

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt M H Mamatha

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt. Shivarudramma

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri K P Manjunath

Court : Karnataka

..... the bda who is the chief executive and administrative officer of the authority has authenticated the same by his signature. instead of mentioning section 52 of the bda act, section 4(2) of the l.a. act has been mentioned. it is settled law that mere mentioning of a wrong provision of law would make no difference. power is vested ..... . on 2.4.2008 the government accorded approval and on 21.5.2008 a preliminary notification was issued under 1 bda for short 2 the act for short 213 section 17 of the act proposing to acquire an extent of 4814 acres and 15 guntas of land. vide resolution bearing no.340/09 dated 12.1.2010, the bda ..... that similarly placed lands have been left out when the final notification was issued or in respect of which subsequently the lands have been denotified from acquisition under section 48 of the act; iii) grievances by owners of lands where educational institutions are situated; iv) grievances by owners of lands whose surrounding lands have been denotified; v) grievances .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //