Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 10 commission and appointment Court: chennai Page 7 of about 620 results (0.174 seconds)

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court : Chennai

..... duty paid on the imported components, would form part of the sale price of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner, for the purpose of tnvat act, 2006, has assumed significance, due to two facts namely (a) that the petitioner is located in a special economic zone, which enjoys exemption under section 26 of the sez act, 2005 and (b) that the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner were cleared by the buyer by filing a bill of entry, indicating ..... therefore, the contention of mr.c.natarajan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that an importation takes place, in terms of section 46(1) of the customs act, 1962, when the importer presents a bill of entry to the proper officer and in terms of section 47 when the proper officer passes an order permitting the clearance of the goods, after being satisfied about the compliance of certain conditions including the condition that the importer has paid the ..... in rajasthan spinning and weaving mills, the supreme court pointed out that the issues relating to (i) recovery, (ii) interest, and (iii) penalty are dealt with in sections 11-a, 11-aa, 11-ab and 11-ac and that penalty under section 11-ac is a punishment for the act of deliberate deception by the assessee with intent to ..... to test the correctness of the above contention, it is necessary to take a look at sections 26 and 30 of the special economic zones act, 2005, which is a central enactment and sections 12 and 15 of the tamil nadu special economic zones act, 2005. .....

K.Ramaraj Vs. State

Court : Chennai

..... in that case, their lordships of the privy council referred to woolmington's case and said that it was a decision on the common law of england and that they preferred to go by the definition of the word proved in section 3 of the ceylon evidence ordinance, which is pari materia to the definition of the word proved in section 3 of the indian evidence act, 1872, since both were fathered by sir james stephens. ..... it is stated that on 03.07.2011 at 13.00 hrs when dilshan was playing inside the compound of the army officers enclave and picking almonds, he was shot by an unknown army man and that was informed to her at around 13.30 hrs by his two friends. ..... indira nagar colony is just across the road from the army officers enclave and it will take hardly a few minutes for the boys to dart across the road to tell p.w.1.13. ..... this incident had generated so much of heat between the army authorities and the civilians, that the director general of police directed transfer of investigation from the file of b3 fort police station to the cbcid and therefore, p.w.53 handed over the case to sankarasubramaniam [p.w.55]. ..... (1) lt.col.ramaraj retired from service and was living in the army quarters, d.no.11/4 in the first floor, officers enclave, old fort, chennai. ..... on 03.07.2011, he received instructions from the army control room not to let outsiders enter into the compound and accordingly, when he went there, he found an irate crowd which even started pelting stones at the army men. .....

Smt. I. Veluthai, W/O Late Irulandi, Proprietor of Lucky Xerox and Tel ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC525; (2005)4MLJ516

..... as the premises were required for the use of troops and stores of army, the notice to vacate was issued on 31.5.1997 and then another notice was issued on 25.8.1997 under sub-section (1) and clause (b)(ii) of sub-section (2) of section 4 of public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971(hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). ..... further, the learned counsel brought to the notice of this court that the notice ex.b-5 dated 31.5.1997 issued under section 4(2) of the act and subsequent notice issued under section 5(1) of the act were replied by the revision petitioner and on considering such reply, the entire proceedings of eviction under the act was dropped by the respondents and thereafter, military receivable order ex.a-6 was also issued, on the basis of which, rent upto july 1998 has been paid by the revision petitioner for ..... the learned additional central government standing counsel appearing for the respondents by referring to various provisions of the act, mainly contended that the revision petitioner is an unauthorised occupant within the meaning of the act and so action was initiated by issuing notice ex.b-6 dated 25.8.1997 under sub-section (1) and clause (b)(ii) of sub-section (2) of section 4 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971, as per which the revision petitioner was called upon to appear on 12.9.1997 as to why the order of eviction should not .....

D.S. Mahi and Ram Diya Vs. the Special Police Establishment

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(1)PTC0(Mad)

..... cvd, avadi from the mgo branch of the army headquarters new delhi in such of those cases processed by a1 and a2 and a5 amongst them to prepare the necessary mros and issue vouchers in such cases for facilitating quick delivery of the vehicles and pursuance of the aforesaid criminal conspiracy, in the below mentioned instances, the 4-h section of the mgo branch of army headquarters was induced to part with allotment orders in ..... obtain delivery of vehicles fraudulently from cvd, avadi, a8 to a10 to part with allotment orders issued in the names of several ex- servicemen in favour of unauthorised persons without adhering to the prescribed regulations and without even obtaining any acknowledgment whatsoever from the concerned ex-servicemen allottees, a3 amongst them to attest the forged signatures of such of those ex-servicemen allottees as genuine in their authority letters sponsored by a2 ..... and documentary evidence, the learned trial judge had convicted a9 & a10 under section 120(b) ipc and under section 5(2) & 5(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act (two counts) for a9 and (5 counts) for a10 and sentenced to under go six months ri under section 120(b) ipc each and two years ri and ..... 1950 to 1959 he was working in indian air force and his discharge certificate is ex.p.175 and that he worked again in the army from 1962 and 1965 and at that time one jaishriram was working with him and as per the information given by jaishriram, he came to know that vehicles are being sold to ex-army .....

Shri G. Yesupadam Versus Madras Engineer Group and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... only spouse is entitled for family pension under regulation 212 of pension regulations in the army act 1961 and not the petitioner. ..... 5(d)the contention of the learned jag officer that even the petitioners mother had made her claim only in the year 1998 and hence, even if the relief is granted, that must be only from the date of the first claim of the petitioners mother, is also not ..... the records it is also seen that another w.p.no.3030 of 2002 was filed before the honourable high court of andhra pradesh by the respondents (ministry of defence and others) challenging the order passed by the central administrative tribunal in o.a.no.1088 of 2001 in favour of the petitioners mother smt. ..... officer, the petitioner has not come with clean hand to the court because his grandmother addiyamma (mother of spr g.ayyanna) had approached the respondents through a letter claiming that she is entitled to gpf and other benefits due to her son spr g.ayyanna, who had breathed his last in the year 1985 itself. ..... this regulation reads thus: 376_ deserters from the regular army:_ a person subject to aa who is declared absent under aa, section 106 does not thereby cease to belong to the corps in which he is enrolled though no longer shown on its returns, and can, if subsequently arrested, be tried by court martial for ..... family pension is admissible to the widows of junior commissioned officers/other ranks, who die in service but of causes which are neither attributable to nor aggravated by military .....

A. Vijayakumar Versus Union of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... over stay in his village, which led to an action being taken under section 39(b) of the army act 1950 by the competent authority. ..... the petitioner was awarded 28 days of rigorous imprisonment and 14 days detention under section 39 (b) of the army act on 5th november 1980, he was not eligible ..... casual leave from 4th august 1980 to 23rd august 1980, but since the petitioner failed to join duty on 24th august 1980, but rejoined voluntarily on 29th october 1980, he was tried and punished under section 39(b) of the army act on 5th november 1980 to undergo 28 days of rigorous imprisonment and 14 days of detention. ..... awarded 28 days of rigorous imprisonment and 14 days detention under section 39 (b) of the army act on 5th november 1980. ..... [the learned counsel for the petitioner represents at this stage that the representation made by the petitioner to the chief of the army staff (r2 herein) was disposed of and after exhausting all the remedies open to the petitioner only, the petitioner has approached the honourable high court of judicature at madras by way of filing ..... the petitioner is that he was promoted to the rank of junior commissioned officer as early as on 1.7.2002 and he was due to retire on 31.08.2004. ..... in brief relevant for the purpose of deciding this case runs as follows:- 2(a) the petitioner joined in the military service in the year 1978 and after gradual promotion, on 01.07.2002 the petitioner reached the rank of naib subdehar, which is a junior commissioned officer post (jco). .....

CaptaIn (Honorary) K.V. Devasia (Retd) Vs. Union of India, Rep by Its ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... the applicant, who was discharged from service on 31.08.1992 under army act section 13(3) i(i)(a), after getting the release of service pension and disability element of pension, is standing before us with this application with a claim that the disability element of pension granted by the respondents is not in accordance with the latest government orders. ..... the applicant, after exhausting the statutory remedies available to him, has come forward with this application claiming disability element of pension at the rate of 75% from 01.01.1996 at par with the commissioned officers, since he was discharged in the rank of honorary captain. 3. ..... as per the government decision, while implementing the v central pay commission recommendations, the disability element of the persons, who are receiving disability pension, has to be enhanced to 50% (for less than 50%), to be enhanced to 75% (for between 50% to 75%) and to be enhanced to 100% (for above 75%). ..... the contention of the applicant that he is also entitled for such rounding off from 1st january 1996 is not sustainable because in the case of the applicant the onset of the invalid disease in the rank of junior commissioned officer and not in the rank of honorary commissioned officer. ..... now the point for determination in this application is whether the applicant is entitled to disability element of pension at the rate of 75% from 01.01.1996 on par with commissioned officers as prayed for? 8. .....

Soundararajan and ors. Vs. Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ665Mad; (1994)IMLJ496

..... pointed out that in this case, this depot was directed by the overall peace keeping force commander to provide logistic support during op pawan operations at sri lanka and that in order to provide logistic support for the troops and to free flow of vital arms and ammunitions for effective operation in the island, cvd avadi, that is the second respondent depot, had been given an additional role to supply ordnance stores to the ..... view of that, the impugned orders in this writ petition are set aside and instead of granting the prayer as asked for, moulding the prayer to suit the occasion, i am of the view that a direction is to issue to the first respondent herein, to refer the matter under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy ..... is also stated that ordnance depot, avadi is under the army ordnance corps which is a part of defence service and as such it is not a defence establishment as contended by ..... filed by the second respondent stating that the functions of the commandant, ordnance depot, madras - 55 are under the army ordnance corps and governed by the regulations pertaining to army ordnance services issued by the ministry of defence. ..... , to meet the ipkf army requirement during 'op pawan' when the indian troops were deployed in sri lanka, that when sovereign activities of the government of india were over, the engagement of the petitioner therein were dispensed with and that all the said facts were not put forth in .....

The President of the District Board Vs. K. Gopalakkrishna Bhatta

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1923)45MLJ125

..... the respondent tried to collect tolls on these carts and he received an order from the appellant, president of the district-board, forbidding him to collect tolls, he basing his prohibition on his interpretation of the army act under which he decided that no toll was payable in respect of carts carrying supplies for the army. ..... the other articles relied upon are articles 1 and 3 which except from the cognisance of a small cause court suits concerning acts or orders purporting to be done by the governor-general in council or by a local government or by a member of the council and suits concerning acts or orders purporting to be clone by any other officer of the government in his official capacity. ..... a preliminary point is taken in this second appeal under section 102 of the civil procedure code on the ground that this was a suit which could be brought in the provincial small cause court being for an amount under rs 500. ..... it is suggested that the court that had heard the case had no jurisdiction by reason of section 6 of the tolls act xxi of 1901. ..... the article of that schedule relied upon is article 19 - 'a suit for a declaratory decree not being a suit instituted under section 283 of the code of civil procedure. ..... by that section provisions are made for compensation to certain persons who sustain loss by reason of that act. ..... even if it were so, that section does not in my judgment exclude the jurisdiction of the small cause court to hear cases such as this.5. .....

S. Venkatachalam Vs. M. Sambamurthy

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC197; (1997)IIMLJ426

..... is a retired army person, he is entitled to take advantage of the section 10(3-a)(a)(i) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960.3. ..... 1995 for eviction of the tenant under sections 10(2)(i), 10(2)(ii)(b) and 10(3)(a)(iii) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act 18 of 1960 amended by act 23 of 1973. ..... the other contention that the petitioner is not a retired army person since he is re-employed and therefore he cannot take advantage of section 10(3-a)(a)(i). ..... him, the provision of law in the petition has been typed inadvertantly due to typographical error and a wrong section has been mentioned in the petition. ..... other contention that he is not entitled to the advantage of section 10(3-a)(b), is a matter that has to be decided in the enquiry ..... even though an observation is made to the effect that the rent control act of tamil nadu which is silent about the power of the rent controller to allow amendment of petition for eviction, the learned judge permitted the amendment.5. ..... that the respondent is not a retired army person since he has re-appointment. ..... in paragraph 14, the learned judge has stated as follows:'when the act or rule confers certain powers on the authorities concerned, it does not follow that those are the only powers that could be exercised ..... 'after referring to the various judgments of the supreme court and the other high courts, the learned judge felt that the amendment sought for is to avoid multiplicity of litigation, hence he allowed .....