Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 preamble 1 army act 1950 Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 3,522 results (0.105 seconds)

B.M. Sukumar Shetty, Managing Trustee, Kollur Mookambika Temple and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5241; 2005(5)KarLJ481

..... state. the supreme court in shri admar mutt's case warned the karnataka state to legislate a comprehensive legislation governing the field of temples and mutts. now in the preamble of present impugned act, it is stated that to make better provision for the management and administration of the hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments in. the state of karnataka the present ..... 1947 when india became independent the central acts, like, (i) the religious endowments act, 1863; (ii) the charitable endowments act, 1890; (iii) the charitable and religious trusts act, 1920, were in force in different regions of karnataka. in addition to these central acts there were provincial acts, governing different parts of karnataka state like.--(i) the bombay public trusts act, 1950;(ii) the madras hindu religious and charitable .....

Ramesh Chandra Lahoti and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secre ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4030; 2006(6)KarLJ102

..... vide notification dated 24.11.1999 formulated a scheme called 'floor price scheme for agricultural / horticultural commodities in karnataka' (the 'scheme' for short). the preamble of the scheme reads as under:'1.01 the agricultural policy resolution of the government of karnataka stresses to bring in 'price and market reforms' in the ..... of agricultural produce and the establishment and administration of markets for agricultural produce in the state of karantaka.' the law makers amended this object of the act by act no. 43 of 1976 with effect from 29.5.1976 by substituting the words 'marketing' in place of the word 'buying and selling'. further ..... the principles for upholding constitutional validity of imposition of levy of market fee in a notified market area have been laid down. the agricultural produce marketing acts have been enacted by various state legislatures. the beneficial legislation is aimed to prevent exploitation of growers of agricultural produce in the hands of dealers, .....

H.V. Thimmegowda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3156; [2002(94)FLR928]; ILR2001KAR3683; 2001(4)KarLJ548

..... in the case on hand, we are dealing with the offence alleged under the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952. the preamble to the act reads thus:'an act to provide for the institution of provident funds, family pension fund and deposit-linked insurance fund for employees in factories and ..... , foreign exchange violation and offences under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, (c) essential commodities act, food adulteration act, acts dealing with environment or any other economic offences, (d) offences under arms act, explosive substances act, terrorists and disruptive activities act, (e) offences relating to the army, navy and air force, (f) offences against public tranquility, (g ..... import and export of currency and bullion in the economic and financial interest of india. the general purpose or object of the act given in the preamble may not show the specific purpose of the classification made in section 23(1)(a) and section 23(i-a). the court .....

E.i.D. Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR105

..... the appropriate legislature, is justified or not. one of the noble objectives of the constitution as enshrined in the preamble is to ensure justice - social, economic and political. from this it follows, just as maintaining the army for the defence of the country or the police for maintenance of law and order or establishing and maintaining educational ..... 's case, : [1973]2scr973 the only ground for our consideration is as to whether the total amount of court fee collected after the amendment to the act, by act 21 of 1979 exceeds to any substantial extent over and above the expenses incurred for administration of civil justice in the state. as far as this question is ..... 1. in this batch of writ petitions, the following common question of law arises for consideration :'whether section 20 of the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act, 1958 ('the act' for short) which provides for payment of court fee at the rate of ten per cent ad valorem, computed on the basis of the monetary value of .....

Pradosh S Rao Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... er rep 576 (hl)]. ac p. 602, as the best definition of a judicial act as distinguished from an administrative act.29. in khushaldas advani case [1950 scc551: air1950sc222 the court was examining whether the act in question was a ministerial/administrative act or a judicial/quasi-judicial one in the context of whether a writ - 18 - ..... (1) having legal authority, (2) to determine questions affecting rights of subjects, and (3) having the duty to act judicially, (4) act in excess of their legal authority a writ of certiorari may issue. (khushaldas case [1950 scc551: air1950sc222 , air p. 225, para6) 30. fazl ali, j.in his concurring opinion in khushaldas case ..... also agreed with the above test for determining whether a particular act is a judicial or an administrative one. das, j., observed: (khushaldas case [1950 scc551: air1950sc222 , air p. 257, para163) 163. the real test which distinguishes a quasi-judicial act from an administrative act is the third item in atkin, l.j.'s definition, .....

Shri Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... party before him. (emphasis supplied) considered on the touchstone of the principles of bias, as laid down by the apex court and on the perusal of the preamble of the cabinet note supra what would unmistakably emerge it that the decision of the cabinet the cabinet nominated by the chief minister, would not be free from ..... sanction for prosecution of shri siddaramaiah, hon ble chief minister of karnataka for commission of offences under sections 7, 9, 11, 12 and 15 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 ( pc act ) ad sections 59, 61, 62, 201, 227, 228, 229, 239, 314 316(5), 318(1), 318(2), 318(3), 319, 322, 324, 324(1), ..... 163(1). 155.2. secondly, under article 163(1) the discretionary power of the governor extends to situations, wherein a constitutional provision expressly requires the governor to act in his own discretion. 155.3. thirdly, the governor can additionally discharge functions in his own discretion, where such intent emerges from a legitimate interpretation of the provision .....

Sri Suresha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... or community or any other ground whatsoever.18. the ingredients necessary for making out an offence under section 153-a(b) is the commission of any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely ..... disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely ..... of the ipc reads as follows: 153-a. promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony. (1) whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts .....

Smt K R Aruna Prasad Vs. Sri V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....

Smt. G K Akshata Vs. V Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....

Ningesh Vs. Nanjegowda

Court : Karnataka

..... the compensation by himself, apart from other actions for his infraction.13. in cases of accidents arising out of the use of a motor vehicle, the motor vehicles act, 1988 ( the mv act ) provides for establishing tribunals which are required to award compensation which appears to it to be just . thus, there is a statutory obligation on the tribunal to ..... of compensation for a wrong, this limitation would not and cannot apply because that would be a self-defeating exercise.74. to explain this with an analogy, if in 1950 the law makers felt that a payment of rs. 100 as compensation for the loss of a buffalo was sufficient, obviously the said sum cannot be awarded in 2024 ..... the most logical way to address this anomaly would be to compound the recorded value of inflation to a base sum and arrive at the figure for every year since 1950. this sum would reflect the actual value of the base sum in a particular year since the effect of inflation on the rupee would be reflected correctly.-. 44 - .....