Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 preamble 1 army act 1950 Court: himachal pradesh Page 39 of about 386 results (0.091 seconds)

Nov 20 1951 (HC)

Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. A.N. Sen and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1952)ILLJ371HP

..... double barrelled objection to the application under article 226 of the constitution. in the first place, it is said that section 7. industrial disputes (appellate tribunal) act, 1950, hereinafter called appellate act, gives a specific and adequate legal remedy to the bank from the order of the tribunal passed on 12th september 1951, and in the second place, it ..... relief to bring about industrial peace. in the bharat bank limited, delhi v. the employees' of bharat bank ltd., delhi, and the bharat bank employees' union, delhi 1950 2 l.l.j. p. 921 mukherjea, j. said:in settling the dispute between the employer and the workmen, the function of the tribunal is not confined to ..... the matters referred for adjudication to the tribunal the order does not come within section 2(b) of the act and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to make that order. in thakur yugal kishore sinha v. the state of bihar 1950 2 l.l.j. 9. 539 an identical contention was raised. in repelling the contention meredith, c.j .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2012 (HC)

Ramesh Chand Prasher Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary ( ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... state is empowered to distribute natural resources. however, as they constitute public property/national asset, while distributing natural resources, the state is bound to act in consonance with the principles of equality and public trust and ensure that no action is taken which may be detrimental to public interest. like any ..... democratic form of government demands equality and absence of arbitrariness and discrimination . the rule of law prohibits arbitrary action and commands the authority concerned to act in accordance with law. every action of the state or its instrumentalities should neither be suggestive of discrimination, nor even apparently give an impression of ..... to get the highest price for the property but also to ensure fairness in the activities of the state and public authorities. they should undoubtedly act fairly. their actions should be legitimate. their dealings should be above board. their transactions should be without aversion or affection. nothing should be suggestive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1980 (HC)

Gandharv Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1189

..... exercise his power under section 20-a of the act in ordering prosecution of the petitioner in the manner in which he has done and the impugned order, therefore, is unsustainable.11. with these remarks i accept this ..... before the magistrate and this being so, the impugned order cannot be said to have been passed during the pendency of the trial of an offence under the act alleged to have been committed by any person other then the manufacturer, distributor or dealer of any article of food. the magistrate, therefore, could certainly not legally ..... was found adulterated. the food inspector accordingly filed a complaint against the said shri ba] kishan under section 16(1)(a) read with section 7 of the act.3. the magistrate, on the complaint being presented to him, proceeded forthwith to summon shri bal kishan vendor and after shri bal kishan put in appearance before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2013 (HC)

Jai Nand Sharma Vs. H.P.S.E.B. Ltd. Through Its Chief Executive Office ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... law or the executive action supported by such law cannot be arbitrary, unfair, unjust, oppressive or unreasonable (see: a.k. gopalan v. state of madras, air 1950 sc 27 and smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india and another, air 1978 sc 597 wherein the word law occurring in article 21 has been given similar meaning ..... 300-a. no payment with compliance reported can be directed to be made by government servant for the alleged loss sustained by the government on account of his act(s) of omission or commission, even though the direction may be described as requiring compliance voluntarily , without satisfying the requirements of law and natural justice. taking ..... 1971 sc 1409). indeed, till the deletion of sub-clause (f) of clause (1) of article 19 and of article 31 by the constitution (forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978, with effect from june 20, 1979, the right to receive pension was regarded as property and, therefore, fundamental right within the meaning of those constitutional provisions (see .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2011 (HC)

State of H.P. Vs. Sukh Ram and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... course of investigation, before an authority other than the magistrate or court having jurisdiction to enquire into or try such case. first part of section 73 evidence act is reproduced for ready reference: 73. comparison of signature, writing or seal with others admitted or proved.in order to ascertain whether a signature, writing, ..... by the accused or the concerned person during the course of enquiry or trial. use of words in first part of section 73 of the evidence act that either such specimen signatures/writings should be admitted or proved clearly suggests that specimen signatures/writings of a person, whose disputed signatures/writings on some ..... complying the requirement of section 207 cr. p.c., charged the respondents with offences, under the aforesaid penal provisions of indian penal code and prevention of corruption act. respondents pleaded not guilty to the charge. they were, therefore, put on trial. 7. defence of the respondents was of denial simplicitor. they denied that there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2011 (HC)

James Albert Vs. State of Hp

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... certainly, there is no principle of law that without corroboration by the independent witnesses the testimonies of the official witnesses cannot be relied upon. the presumption that person acts honestly applies as much in favour of police personnel as of other person. the learned trial court quite aptly relied upon the judgment of apex court rendered in ..... judge in sessions trial no.46/2008, decided on 18th september, 2010, for the offence punishable under section 20 of the narcotic drugs psychotropic substances act, 1985, in short the act, for allegedly keeping in his possession 820.64 grams of charas in the recovered stuff weighing 2 kgs. 2. in short, the prosecution story as ..... of the narcotic stands proved from the accused, the presumption of culpable mental state can be safely drawn, as per provisions of section 35 of the act. the accused has failed to account satisfactorily for its possession. therefore, he is proved held to have committed the offence charged in view of section 54 of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //