Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 4 establishment of armed forces tribunal Court: kerala Page 3 of about 36 results (0.123 seconds)

Feb 18 1999 (HC)

A. Gopalkrishna Bhat and ors. Vs. Kaveri Amma and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1999Ker247

..... resumption has been finally rejected, vest in the government free from all encumbrances. of course, the period of resumption is extended in the case of persons employed in the armed forces. the other relevant sections are sections 16, 16a, 17 and 18. before we go into the question regarding vesting in the case of holding for which an application ..... section shall apply to a holding or part of a holding in respect of which an application for resumption under the provisions of this act is pending on such date before any court or tribunal or in appeal or revision. learned counsel for the petitioners relied on the proviso and submitted that the vesting does not take place on ..... taluk. respondents 1 to 12 are the tenants of the petitioners. the petitioners are small holders and hence application was filed for resumption of the holding before the land tribunal, kannur and the same was registered as o.a. no. 56/71. finally, this court confirmed the order of resumption of one half of the holding in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1976 (HC)

Raghavan Nair Vs. Narayana Panicker

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1977Ker11

..... in respect of tenancies subsisting at the commencement of this act, no application for resumption shall be made after a period of one year from such commencement:provided that where the landlord is--(i) a minor; or(ii) a person of unsound mind; or(iii) a member of the armed forces or a seaman and the tenant is entitled to fixity ..... within the said period of six months; (2) the right of resumption in respect of a holding shall be exercised only once, and the order of the land tribunal allowing resumption shall be given effect to only et the end of an agricultural year;(3) no kudiyiruppu shall be resumed;(4) no land in the possession of a ..... holders. the petitioner raised the plea of limitation and contended that the petition should have been filed under section 18 of the act within a period of one year from the commencement of act i of 1964. the land tribunal before whom the petition was filed upheld the plea of limitation and dismissed the petition for resumption. in appeal, the appellate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1989 (HC)

Sumathi Vs. S. Devasan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1991Ker295

..... 'an order'.12. the act contemplates various types of orders to be passed by a rent control court. section 11 itself provides for orders of eviction being passed if the conditions specified therein are made out by the landlord. section 11a makes special provisions in favour of members of the armed forces. section 12 contemplates orders stopping ..... . the application was rejected and that was challenged in appeal under section 38(1) of the act. this provision laid down that an appeal lay to the rent control tribunal from every order of the controller made under the act. the question was whether the appeal in question could be entertained under this provision. the supreme ..... the main proceeding. subject to the aforesaid limitation, an appeal lies to the rent control tribunal from every order passed by the controller under the act. even an interlocutory order passed under section 37(2) is an order passed under the act and is subject to appeal under section 38( 1) provided it affects some right or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2012 (HC)

P.K. Salim Babu Vs. the Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Li ...

Court : Kerala

..... noted in dev dutt, a single entry can destroy the career of an officer. non-communication of entries in acr of a public servant (except in the armed force) has civil consequences as it may affect his promotion and other benefits. the concept of other benefits include confirmation of higher scales of pay and higher grade. ..... in terms of article 141 of the constitution, has not been considered; more particularly because, non-communicated acr entries, admittedly, have been acted upon as against the applicant, writ petitioner. the tribunal has made observations on the merits of the acr entries, even on those which were not communicated by the establishment to the employee. the ..... radhakrishnan, j. 1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for bsnl. 2. the petitioner was the applicant before the central administrative tribunal. he aspires to be recommended as eligible for movement from sub divisional engineer (sde) to senior sde in the open category. going by ext.r6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1990 (HC)

C.J. Palu Vs. the Assistant Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1991CriLJ980

..... adjudicating authorities vested with the judicial powers of the state throughout the territory of india barring those constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces. in this background, the basic test of a tribur within the meaning of article 136 is that it is an adjudicating authority (other than ..... proceedings which will ultimately culminate in passing orders for confiscation and imposition of penalty, and prosecution for offences under the act. the adjudication proceedings are conducted departmentally, and what the tribunal considers is only an appeal against the departmental proceedings and the order passed in adjudication proceedings. there is no question of ..... is the result of departmental proceedings. the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for an offence under the act before the tribunal. it has no powers of a criminal court. the proceedings culminating in an appeal before the tribunal cannot be considered to be the ending of a prosecution.18. relying upon the decisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (HC)

Norka Roots Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Ker)484; [2009]183TAXMAN417(Ker)

..... as a charitable institution was applied for under section 12aa on 12-4-2004. on rejection of the application on 7-3-2005, appeal was filed before the tribunal and the tribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the commissioner on 5-5-2006. however, fresh order was issued by the commissioner on 6-2-2007 ..... the commissioner is beyond the period of limitation, and so much so, they are entitled to be treated as registered under section 12aa(2) of the act. the tribunal however held that limitation is saved by operation of section 153(2a) of the act and so much so the assessee's claim for deemed grant of registration is not tenable. on merits ..... . tribunal decided the appellant's eligibility. it is against this order that the assessee has approached this court with this appeal.2. we have heard counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1994 (HC)

Thomas Vs. Babu

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1995ACJ780; [1995(70)FLR637]; (1995)IILLJ141Ker

..... in schedule ii. whether the contract of employment was made before or after the passing of this act and whether such contract is expressed or implied, oral or in writing, but does not include any person working in the capacity of a member of the armed forces of the union; and any reference to a workman who has been injured shall, where the ..... as possible from hardship arising from accidents due to growing complexity of industry with increasing use of machinery with consequent danger to workmen. the act provides for cheaper and quicker disposal of disputes relating to compensation through special tribunals than possible under the civil law. the passage of time has paved the way to make the approach of the courts even widening .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2003 (HC)

Chandran Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2003(2)KLT567

..... the representatives of police officers belonging to the principal police service and the armed police/armed reserve. however the central administrative tribunal quashed the government order as if the tribunal was considering an appeal from the decision of the government. the tribunal acted like an appellate authority and substituted its judgment for that of the government. ..... as state police service only if they are declared by the state government to be equivalent to the principal police force of the state. prior to 22.1.1965 the armed police and armed reserve were not treated as state police service for the purpose of appointment to the indian police service by ..... to the government. the committee consisted of persons who have expertise and experience in the field and direct knowledge of the working of the police force. the findings and recommendations of the committee were unanimous. the state government carefully examined the report of the expert committee and decided to accept the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2012 (HC)

Massimilano Latorre, Holder of Italian Passport Number Aa 1465972, (Ch ...

Court : Kerala

..... only as a case of brutal murder and can in no way be masqueraded as a discharge of the sovereign function. where the members of military forces of a country commit wrongful acts, while engaging in non-military functions, it is quite appropriate for the aggrieved state to claim jurisdiction and subject them to the local law. international ..... the flag state of the vessel or their own state. it was contended that they are therefore entitled to functional immunity from prosecution except before the courts or military tribunals of italy. 5. with these pleadings, the petitioners have sought the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for declaration of the registration of ext.p2, ..... the unclos. therefore, this is a case which is not covered by article 97 of unclos. 27. it is admitted that the marines were on the vessel as armed security personnel. attention was canvassed to the revised interim guidance to ship owners, ship operators and ship masters on the use of privately contracted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1988 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

..... 1994 by which section 123 was amended and section 124a was introduced came into force which the appeal was pending before this court and by taking recourse to sees. 13 and 24 of the railway claims tribunal act, 1987 it was held that the tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a claim coming under untoward incident. the decision cannot be ..... basin near the door, soon after the train left palakkad railway station, the trainjerked violently, throwing her out on the track. the train ran over her right arm which was cut off and fractured her spinal cord. while she was thus lying numb on the railway track without being noticed by any body alleppey-madras express ..... incidents (compensation) rules, 1990 as amended by the amendment rules 1997 granted an amount of rs. 3,20,000/-for the amputation of the arm. the cross appeal is directed against the tribunal not granting any compensation for the other injuries.42. in the appeal memorandum several contentions are raised on the merits of the claim. but, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //