Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... in the present case does not fall within the definition of 'service matters' as defined under section 3 (o) of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'act of 2007') as it the impugned order passed in summary court marshal and the punishment is not by way of s.b. ..... .05.2013, transferring back these matters for the persons covered under the three enactments to which the said act of 2007 applies, namely, the army act, 1950, navy act, 1957 and the air force act, 1950 to the said armed forces tribunal. learned counsel for the respondents has also drawn the attention of the court towards the larger bench decision ..... matters viz. service matters pertaining to the person covered by these three acts will be decided by the tribunal.4. it is unfortunate that the division bench of the armed forces tribunal, jaipur bench, has not properly appreciated the said larger bench decision of the armed forces tribunal itself in the case of ex-hav. parmeshwar ram (supra) and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the view that any other punishment, except the punishment of dismissal awarded under section 82 of the air force act, cannot be considered to be the service matter . within the meaning of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 ( the act of 2007 ) and, therefore, it had no jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide the application filed ..... by the present respondent. it appears that after having heard the learned counsel for the present respondent (writ-petitioner) in the said writ petition (no.1573/2011).the learned single judge formed an opinion that the jurisdiction of the tribunal ..... referred to in saw no.165/2012 2 section 3 (o) of the act of 2007 were required to be adjudicated by the tribunal. the learned single judge particularly referred to clause (iv) of section 3(o) of the act of 2007 and observed that the term any other matter, whatsoever . made .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on record, we see no persuasive or weighty reason to differ from the reasonings and conclusions recorded by the learned tribunal. true it is that the fifth central pay commission while suggesting the composition of the central health service did exclude the armed forces medical personnel while recommending integration of posts outside the organized services therein, but no decision as such was taken ..... by the petitioners while acting on the said recommendation rejecting the claim of the equally placed armed forces medical personnel for being extended the non functional selection grade and the dacp scheme benefits to them. instead records demonstrate in an unequivocal terms that not only .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!