Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
..... she is residing and in possession of the said plot. initially a notice dt.28/09/1991 u/s 32 of jda act was served upon her - against which a reference was filed before the jda appellate tribunal; and at that time, petitioner along with her husband went to the officer of jda and apprised of the factual position ..... on merits and liberty was also granted to her to approach again. at the same time, while the respondents were trying to dispossess the petitioner by use of force, petitioner had no option but to file suit for injunction before civil judge and temporary injunction was granted by civil court vide order dt.10/08/07 (ann. ..... recognition to such encroachers claiming regularization of plot on the premise of unauthorized/illegal possession over government land. after going through material on record and the judgment of the tribunal, this court does not find any manifest error or perversity in the findings recorded which may call for interference.8. before parting with the order, this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
..... .10. hon'ble the apex court in assistant commercial taxes officer v. bajaj electricals limited (supra), considered the provisions of section 78(5) of the rajasthan sales tax act, 1994. the amendment made in section 78(5) on 22.03.2002 was also considered and it was held that expression person in charge of the goods under section ..... assessing officer during enquiry, however, the assessment order was set aside on the ground that before 22.03.2002, when amendment was made in section 78(5) of the act of 1994, penalty could not have been levied against owner of the goods and it could have been levied only against 'vehicle driver' or 'person in charge of the ..... be sent along with the goods.4. the assessing officer was not satisfied with the explanation furnished by the assessee and consequently, levied penalty under section 78(5) of the act @ 30%, amounting to rs.60,481/- vide order dated 30.06.1999. being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the assessee, which was allowed by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
..... acquisition or affect it in any manner and same is the position regarding notice under section 32 and 33 of the j.d.a. act. so far as the order passed by the j.d.a. tribunal in the case of gandi grah nirman co-operative society is concerned, it find place in the affidavits filed by mr.solanki and ..... was not the owner of the property in question after publication of notification under sec. 52(1) of the u.i.t. act in the year 1974.judged from any angle, the petition is devoid of force. consequently, it is dismissed summarily.16. perusal of paras quoted above clearly shows that respondents challenged inclusion of structure in khasra no. ..... 77 while notification was issued under section 52(1) and 52(2) of uit act, 1959. thus, they knowing about the acquisition of the structure, .....
Tag this Judgment!