Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 32 condonation Sorted by: recent Page 95 of about 68,418 results (0.347 seconds)

Capt. V.N. Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... , inter alia, pending before a high court, which would have fallen within the jurisdiction of a tribunal, had such proceeding arisen after the establishment of the armed forces tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the armed forces tribunal on the date on which the tribunal was constituted. section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder:34. transfer of pending cases.--(1) every suit, or other proceeding ..... was re-numbered as writ petition (s/b) no. 78 of 2008. after the promulgation of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, a petition assailing the proceedings of a summary court martial, and the order passed thereupon, would only lie to the armed forces tribunal under section 15 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. section 15 is being extracted hereunder:15. jurisdiction, powers and authority in matters of appeal against .....

Jerald Dias Versus Appeal Medical Board and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... approached the honourable madurai bench of madras high court, claiming disability pension by way of filing w.p.no.10859 of 2007, which was transferred to this tribunal after the constitution of this tribunal, under the armed forces tribunal act 2007 and renumbered as t.a.no.15 of 2010. 2. the short facts of the case of the petitioner in the affidavit to the petition ..... (order of the tribunal made by justice aca adityan) 1. the petitioner, who is having two opinions of the medical board to his credit one in favour of him and another against the interest .....

Sukh Dev Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court : Rajasthan

..... the governor.(4) nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a high court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces.26. we quoted sub-clause (1) of article 226 and article 227 completely, which clearly shows that in article 226 words ' ..... our purpose, only question no. 2 is relevant which is as under:2. whether right to file intra-court appeals stands abrogated with the repealing act coming into force on 29.8.2001 by which the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1949 was repealed notwithstanding the several other existing provisions preserving the powers of the high ..... as it can be made applicable, in all proceedings in any court of civil jurisdiction. the explanation to that section inserted by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976, provides as follows:explanation.- in this section, the expression 'proceedings' includes proceedings under order ix, but does not include any proceeding under article 226 of .....

C. Kondaiah, (Ex-serviceman) Versus the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... court of andhra pradesh in w.p.no.7521 of 1997. after the constitution of the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, chennai, in pursuance of the enactment of armed forces tribunal act 2007, the said w.p.no.19660 of 2003 has been transferred to this tribunal and renumbered as t.a.no.87 of 2009. 2. the short facts of the case ..... . damodaran a.v (dead) through lrs and others), the sanctity of the opinion of the medical board cannot be questioned unless there is sufficient material placed before the tribunal. in this regard, the observation in the said dictum, as per dr. mudundakamsharma, j., runs as follows:- 7. the aforesaid provisions including that of the guidelines ..... falls below 20 per cent. he shall, however, continue to draw the service element of disability pension. there is absolutely no iota of evidence available before this tribunal to overcome the above said regulation 186 of the pension regulations for the army 1961 (part i), in respect of the averments raised in the affidavit to .....

Ex. Cpl. K. Angappan Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... 1981 and no.ro/2706/602482/ p and w (dp) dated 16.07.2001. after the constitution of the armed forces tribunal, regional bench, chennai, after the enactment of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, the said petition was transferred to this tribunal and renumbered as t.a.no.130 of 2009. 2. the affidavit to the petition in brief runs as ..... follows:- the petitioner had enrolled in the mighty indian air force on 04.07.1969 in the trade of radio operator ..... factor which is required to be noted is that the report of the medical board is not under challenge. absolutely, there is no material placed before this tribunal to show that only due to the service condition the petitioner was affected by the disease viz schizophrenia. under such circumstances, there is absolutely no material placed .....

M. Appalanaidu Versus the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... honourable high court of andhra pradesh by way of filing w.p.no.12250 of 2005, the same, after the constitution of the armed forces tribunal, regional bench at chennai, after the enactment of the armed forces tribunal act 2007, has been transferred to this tribunal and assigned t.a.no.77 of 2010. 2. the short facts in the affidavit to the petition relevant for deciding this ..... claimant. this benefit will be given more liberally to the claimant in field service case. 5(a) the learned jag officer in his argument would draw the attention of this tribunal to regulation 423, which deals with the attributability to service. but the opinion of the medical board is that the disability under which the petitioner is suffering is not attributable ..... (order of the tribunal made by justice aca adityan) 1. the unfortunate petitioner, who had afmsf-16 / opinion of the invaliding medical board in his favour, after getting an order of rejection of the .....

Nk Satendra Singh Versus Union of India, Through the Secretary Govt. o ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... 15.07.2007 and also the order dated 01.08.2007. this petition has been received from delhi high court by way of transfer because of the enforcement of armed forces tribunal act, 2007. the basic contentions from the side of the petitioner are that he was enrolled in the army as a soldier (general duty) on 24.10.1995 and ..... no.4 did not allow. for making such complaint, tentative charge sheet was made against the petitioner on 25.12.2005 for making false accusations subject to the army act. the petitioner filed objections but was punished in the summary court martial. the petitioner filed writ petition (c) no.9577/2006 in delhi high court but that was ..... petitioner came to know that his commanding officer was not interested to forward his name and other ineligible persons were recommended for such award. feeling dissatisfied from such act or omission on the part of commanding officer, the petitioner decided to report the matter to the chief of army staff for which he was well entitled under .....

Praveen Vs. Land Revenue Commissioner

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ617

..... deed in respect of the land where the description of the property is shown as 'garden land'. the purchase certificate issued under the kerala land reforms act from the competent statutory tribunal as per ext.p5 shows that the extent of 98 cents of land in sy. no. 280/4 and 280/6 of palappuram desam, ottappalam ..... legal issue with reference to the scope and application of the provisions in the land utilization order, after the kerala conservation of paddy land and wet land act, 2008 came into force.4. the kerala land utilization order, 1967 was issued by the government of kerala, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) ..... commissioner, land revenue, thiruvananthapuram, all district collectors and to all revenue divisional officers, directing them that since the kerala paddy land and wet land act, 2008 has came into force, applications for permission to convert such land for other purposes received after that date need not be entertained, considered or decided.20. we may now .....

Maj. Manmohan Singh Battu Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... that the severe reprimand was awarded to the petitioner in the summary court martial proceedings and in view of section 3(o)(iii) of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, this tribunal has no jurisdiction. 4. since the question of jurisdiction is involved, it would be appropriate to extract the provisions of section 3(o)(iii) of ..... the armed forces tribunal act 2007, which read as under: 3. definitions. in this act, unless the context otherwise requires,-- (o) service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all ..... . harmonious interpretation of section 3(o)(iii) would lead only to the conclusion that all service matters are to be entertained by the tribunal except those specifically excluded under the act. it has also been emphasised that four categories of service matters have been excluded by the legislature as is clear from section 3(o .....

P. Aknes Versus the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... at the doors of the honourable high court of judicature at madras (madurai bench), with a writ petition, which has been transferred to this tribunal after the formation of this armed forces tribunal under the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 and reassigned t.a.no.26 of 2010. 2. the short facts in the affidavit to the petition relevant for the purpose of deciding ..... , letter no.1(6)98 d (pension/service) dated 3rd february 1998 that the parents can be granted ordinary family pension, who were wholly dependent on the armed forces personnel, when he/she was alive provided the deceased employee had left behind neither a widow nor a child. since the son of the petitioner was married and ..... contracted a lawful marriage, but were living as husband and wife at the timeof, or got lawfully married subsequent to, the conception of deceased member of the forces. note for the readers if any member of family is denied any share in the property of the individual under a will or deed such member shall be .....