Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 32 condonation Sorted by: recent Page 10 of about 68,418 results (0.350 seconds)

Jul 08 2019 (HC)

Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... and more pragmatic solution to the non-functioning of the ipab is not only to expedite the process of the filling up of the vacancies in the tribunal but to amend the trade marks act to bring in the provisions for the ipab to sit in single benches apart from the bench of two members (one judicial and one technical), as ..... under vide order file no.7/16/2016-ipr-1 dated 21/06/2016, the ministry, dpiit conveyed the approval that in pursuance of finance act, 2017 (7 of 2017) which has come into force on 26th may, 2017, it has been decided to transfer all physical assets and manpower of copyright board the physical and administrative control of the ..... (e) in exercise of the powers conferred of section 1(3) of geographical indication of goods (registration and protection) act, 1999 appointed the 15/09/2003 as the date on which all the provisions of said act shall come into force.2. but the ipab received the geographical indication appeals from the year 2009 only and till date 12 appeals have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2019 (SC)

Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... such record of service, the charge that he had moved away from the post as an act of cowardice cannot be accepted and hence he seeks that the findings recorded by the sgcm and the conclusion reached by the armed forces tribunal be set aside.5. the learned counsel for the respondents has taken us through the appeal ..... 13, 2006, action was initiated under section 34(c) of the army act, proceedings were held by the sgcm and the sentence to undergo imprisonment for six months and dismissal from service was imposed. the appellant assailing the same was before the armed forces tribunal and in the said proceedings the order impugned dated august 26, 2011 is passed ..... was an attack by the militants including the act of the militants in taking away the lmg was explained by the appellant, which he would not have been aware of if he was actually unconscious. in that circumstance, when the evidence has been adverted to by the armed forces 10 tribunal and when such conclusion reached does not indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2019 (HC)

Tushar Ranjan Mohanty vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... court of delhi. the hon'ble court vide its order dated 29.09.2015 inter alia directed as under:"6. we are informed that a former general chief of the armed forces is the concerned minister in the present case. in our view, the concerned minister during his career would have had many opportunities to record the acrs and also would ..... the charge-sheet, had specifically observed that the petitioner would be entitled to all consequential benefits and, therefore, we deem it appropriate to refer to the concluding portion of the tribunal s order dated 29.06.2015, which reads as under:-" xxx in our considered view, as observed earlier, the alleged misconduct on the part of the applicant is too ..... have faced such situations as w.p.(c) 9544/2018 page 11 of 16 detailed in the order of the tribunal."7. we have full faith that the hon'ble minister would act in a fair and just manner. we also have no hesitation in saying that the hon'ble minister would appraise himself based on record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2019 (HC)

Sunborne Energy Rajasthan Solar Pvt. Ltd vs.ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam L ...

Court : Delhi

..... declared or undeclared), invasion, armed conflict or act of foreign enemy, blockade, embargo, revolution, riot, insurrection, terrorist or military action; or in omp (comm.) no.222/2016 page 8 c) radio active contamination or ionizing radiation originating from a source in india or resulting from another force majeure event mentioned above excluding circumstances ..... petitioner was only till 26.03.2013, which is within the time prescribed by the agreement, and should have been allowed by the respondent/arbitral tribunal.21. counsel for the petitioner further submits that upon petitioner s letter seeking approval for the change in the project location on 23.08.2012, ..... that some permission may get delayed or even rejected by the government departments. it cannot, therefore, plead force majeure to justifying its failure. 34. force majeure clauses are to be construed strictly. the arbitral tribunal having rightly come to a finding that the delay was caused due to lack of reasonable care by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2019 (HC)

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Delhi vs.axis Bank & O ...

Court : Delhi

..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2019 (HC)

Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.idbi Bank Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2019 (HC)

Union of India vs.punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2019 (HC)

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.state Bank of India ...

Court : Delhi

..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2019 (HC)

Directorate of Enforcement vs.punjab National Bank & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... facility was enhanced from then rs. 650 lakhs to 1800 lakhs, in the context of certain supply orders to the tune of rs. 2170.90 lakhs statedly received from armed forces. the enhanced credit facility was availed by dsipl but with no adjustment, putting pnb to a loss of about rs. 29.75 crores. crl. appeal no.143/ ..... of pmla are to be borne in mind, the burden of proving facts contrary to the case of money-laundering being on the person claiming to have acted bonafide.151. the appellate tribunal, in the decision (dated 14.07.2017) earlier rendered (in kolkata case), and followed in the matters from which these appeals have arisen, has also ..... matter of the discourse in the impugned decisions of the appellate tribunal, on account of certain amendments, inter alia, to rdba and sarfaesi act, by the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 (act no.44 of 2016), which came into force from 01.09.2016. as per the statement of objects .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2019 (HC)

Commisisoner of Income Tax Delhi vs.sunil Lamba

Court : Delhi

..... narula judgment dr. s. muralidhar, j.:1. this appeal by the revenue, under section 260 a of the income tax act, 1961 ( act ) is directed against an order dated 7th may, 2003 passed by the income tax appellate tribunal (itat) in the ita no.3006/del/2000 for the assessment year (ay) 1995-96. questions of law 2. while ..... were framed by this court: ita no.465/2003 page 1 of 12 1. whether the tribunal is correct in law in holding that assumption of jurisdiction by the cit, under section 263 of the act, was illegal?.2. whether the tribunal has correctly interpreted the two agreements regarding non-compete and trademarks?. background facts 3. the background ..... the assessment order 11. the assessing officer ( ao ) scrutinised the return and passed an assessment order dated 31st december, 1997 under section 143 (3) of the act accepting the returned income and without making any additions. an audit objection was subsequently raised qua the said assessment to the effect ita no.465/2003 page 4 of 12 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //