Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... -i of section 2(12) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (vidarbha region) act, 1958, in which a widow or a minor or a person who is subject to any physical or mental disability, or a serving member of the armed forces could 29 be deemed to cultivate the land personally if it is cultivated by her or ..... khatedar tenant. in ram lal and anr. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the division bench of this court following kalanka devi v/s the maharashtra revenue, tribunal, nagpur & ors. (supra), held that a tenant was entitled to khatedari rights after resumption of jagir. the view was consistently followed by learned single judges of this court ..... the most important judgment to consider the issue raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. (supra), in which the supreme court referring to the definition of the word to cultivate personally . under section 2 15 (12) of the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for the applications pending on the date of issuing notification and it was provided that those applications will be decided in accordance with the rules in force prior to notification dated 28.01.2011. aggrieved by some directions contained in order dated 16.11.2011 certain writ petitions were filed before this court ..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is generally ..... vide notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for the applications pending on the date of issuing notification and it was provided that those applications will be decided in accordance with the rules in force prior to notification dated 28.01.2011. aggrieved by some directions contained in order dated 16.11.2011 certain writ petitions were filed before this court ..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is generally ..... vide notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for the applications pending on the date of issuing notification and it was provided that those applications will be decided in accordance with the rules in force prior to notification dated 28.01.2011. aggrieved by some directions contained in order dated 16.11.2011 certain writ petitions were filed before this court ..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is generally ..... vide notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for the applications pending on the date of issuing notification and it was provided that those applications will be decided in accordance with the rules in force prior to notification dated 28.01.2011. aggrieved by some directions contained in order dated 16.11.2011 certain writ petitions were filed before this court ..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is generally ..... vide notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for the applications pending on the date of issuing notification and it was provided that those applications will be decided in accordance with the rules in force prior to notification dated 28.01.2011. aggrieved by some directions contained in order dated 16.11.2011 certain writ petitions were filed before this court ..... any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the 45 doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.17. this court also explained the remedies flowing by applying the principle of legitimate expectation : (scc pp.546-47, para33) " it is generally ..... vide notification dated 03.04.2013 is beyond the legislative competence of the state government because under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 no such power is left with the state government to provide such provision for rejection of application. learned counsel mr. rajesh joshi invited attention of .....
Tag this Judgment!