Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 32 condonation Page 14 of about 68,096 results (0.465 seconds)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTiCE A.K.SiKRi CHiEF JUSTiCE. Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . through the march of time and various reports of numerous committees and commissions, including the law commission, the idea culminated into the formation of the aft through the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 (for short the act ). the cardinal principle behind all such reports and observations of the courts and also the statement of objects and reasons was singular, that is, independence . cwp no.10751 ..... as the parent ministry as is the case at present, in line with the directions of the hon ble supreme court in union of india vs. r. gandhi since the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, nowhere grants power to the ministry of defence to take over the rule making powers, authority, functioning, appointments, infrastructure, manpower or administrative support of the .....

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

..... while dismissing others. these charges were of serious nature and included the offence of misappropriation. in judicial review, under section 160 of the navy act, one more charge was dropped. the armed forces tribunal found that the respondents had been unable to prove further six charges on the same evidence and convicted the petitioner only with regard to charge ..... the spirit, intendment and purpose of the same under section 161 of the navy act. plea that it was a case of no evidence to support the charge 85. the petitioner has assailed the judgment dated 8th december, 2010 of the armed forces tribunal finding him guilty of charge no.7 on the ground that there was no evidence ..... 23rd december, 2010 passed in m.a.no.448/2010 by the armed forces tribunal.2. the writ petitioner complains of violation of his fundamental rights under articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of constitution of india as well as his statutory rights under the navy act, 1957 and principles of natural justice. wp(c) no.6563/2011 .....

M. Venugopal Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

..... high court of kerala had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition. but, in view of the provisions contained in armed forces tribunal act and rules, this issue has become irrelevant. rule 6 (2) of the armed forces tribunal (procedure) rules, 2008, (for short, procedure rules) permits a person who has ceased to be in service by reason ..... petition, o.p.no.13646/2001 before the honourable high court of kerala and was pending. it was been transferred to this bench of the armed forces tribunal consequent to its formation. the applicant in this transferred application is an ex-serviceman, who was discharged on account of disability. in the application it ..... compensation?; and (4) whether he is entitled to get disability pension?. 4. point no.(1): the applicant filed an additional reply affidavit before this tribunal controverting the averments contained in the counter affidavit, he has raised a contention that counter affidavit is sworn to by wing commander a.s.yadav, commanding .....

Major P.Parathasarathy Versus Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary for ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... in this application, has filed w.p.no.1949 of 2001 before the honourable high court of andhra pradesh at hyderabad, which has subsequently been transferred to this tribunal, after the formation of armed forces tribunal under armed forces tribunal act 2007 and renumbered as t.a.no.55 of 2009. 2. the affidavit to the petition filed by the petitioner for the relief of pension reads as ..... even the total qualifying service of the petitioner comes to 7 years 52 days. (iv)the reference to act 14 of constitution is irrelevant as there is no comparison between an emergency commissioned officer who has rendered 12 years of continuous service in the armed forces, and an officer who has rendered service in broken spells, much of which is nonqualifying. the petitioner .....

Balwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

..... statute later on, was not there before the punjab and haryana high court. the section 2(1) of the armed forces tribunal act 2007, dealing with the applicability of the armed forces act expressly provides that the provisions of armed forces act shall apply to all persons subject to the army act 1950 ? neither any notification nor any material was placed before us to show that any such notification in respect ..... , the petitioner is drawing pension from the army for army service and from gref for that service. section 2 of the armed forces tribunal act 2007 provides that it is applicable to present and retired personnel subject to the army act, navy act and air force act, including their dependants, heirs and successors, in so far as it relates to their service matters. the words service mattershave .....

C.W.P.No.7794 of 2013 Vs. Union of India and Others …respondents

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by the armed forces tribunal, chandigarh regional bench at chandimandir (for short the tribunal ) on 12.03.2013, whereby an original application filed by the petitioner under section 14 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 claiming arrears of pension from 01.01.1986 to 31.12.1995 ..... .and personnel below officer rank (including ncs (e) of the three services, defence security corps and the territorial army) (hereinafter collectively referred to as armed forces personnel).1.1 the provisions of the pension regulations of the three services and various instructions / govt. orders.which are not affected by the provisions of ..... ) dated 30th october, 1987 sub.: implementation of the govt. decisions on the recommendations of the fourth central pay commission regarding pensionary benefits for the armed forces officers and personnel below officer rank retiring or dying in harness on or after 01.01.1986. sir, kumar vimal 2014.07.28 16:53 .....

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... the subject matter in d.c.s.negi (supra) where the doctrine of latches/limitations have to be applied.17. for not approaching the learned armed forces tribunal within the time period laid down under section 22 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, the apex court in the case of tarsem singh (supra) and the division bench of this court in yadhu nath singh (supra) clearly ..... case of d.c.s. negi v. union of india & ors., s.l.p. (civil) c.c. no.3709/2011 dated 07.03.2011 and on section 22 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007.11. the concept of pension has been explained time and again by the supreme court and we may again reiterate the same, that the pension cannot be treated as ..... .p.(c) no.4857/2012 decided on 09.08.2012.5. mr. ankur chhibber, counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, has placed reliance on section 22 of the armed force tribunal act, 2007 and the judgment of supreme court in the case of d.c.s. negi v. union of india & ors., s.l.p. (civil) c.c. no.3709/2011 dated .....

S.B. Dogra Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1992(5)SC667; (1993)IILLJ807SC; 1992(2)SCALE642; (1992)4SCC455; [1992]Supp1SCR825; 1993(2)SLJ167(SC)

..... first time in 1983 after his name was dropped from the select list of 1982. had the writ petition been disposed of before the central administrative tribunals act, 1985, came into force, it would perhaps have met the same fate of dismissal as writ petition no. 280/78 and l.p.a. no.18/81. but that ..... given seniority in the civil post only for the actual period of service rendered in armed forces during the period of emergency i.e. between october 26, 1962 and january 10, 1968. following the above view of this court the tribunal held that s.b. dogra could not be given benefit of seniority for more than ..... not clear the himachal pradesh state service examination. however, he succeeded in the second attempt in 1975 and was appointed against the vacancy reserved for 'demobilised armed forces personnel' under the demobilised armed forces personnel (reservation of vacancies in the himachal pradesh state non-technical services) rules, 1972 (as amended in 1974), (hereinafter called 'the 1972 rules') .....

Nandan Singh Rawat Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... , inter alia, pending before a high court, which would have fallen within the jurisdiction of a tribunal, had such proceeding arisen after the establishment of the armed forces tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the armed forces tribunal on the date on which the tribunal was constituted. section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder:34. transfer of pending cases.-(1) every suit, or other proceeding ..... the petitioner was renumbered as writ petition (s/b) no. 125 of 2007. after the promulgation of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, a petition assailing the proceedings of a summary court martial and order passed thereupon would only lie to the armed forces tribunal under section 15 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. section 15 is being extracted hereunder:15. jurisdiction, powers and authority in matters of appeal against .....

Capt. V.N. Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... , inter alia, pending before a high court, which would have fallen within the jurisdiction of a tribunal, had such proceeding arisen after the establishment of the armed forces tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the armed forces tribunal on the date on which the tribunal was constituted. section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder:34. transfer of pending cases.--(1) every suit, or other proceeding ..... was re-numbered as writ petition (s/b) no. 78 of 2008. after the promulgation of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, a petition assailing the proceedings of a summary court martial, and the order passed thereupon, would only lie to the armed forces tribunal under section 15 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. section 15 is being extracted hereunder:15. jurisdiction, powers and authority in matters of appeal against .....