Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 12 financial and administrative powers of chairperson Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 4 results (0.169 seconds)

Dec 30 2015 (HC)

Manoj Kumar (Service No.691785-B) Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... constituted under special enactment is a court of first instance dealing with the subject matters entrusted to such tribunal and an aggrieved person has to first invoke the jurisdiction of the said tribunal ventilating his grievance and cannot directly invoke the jurisdiction of high court under article 226 of the constitution of india. the armed forces tribunal is established under the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, and is a special tribunal exclusively vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate service grievances of persons governed by army act, navy act and air force act. therefore, it is an effective and efficacious adjudicating forum. the petitioner cannot directly invoke the jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2002 (HC)

A. Sreenivasa Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD881; 2002(4)ALT475

..... 2) or clause (3) shall not be inconsistent with the provision of any law for the time being in force, and shall require the previous approval of the governor. (4) nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a high court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces. 29. it is very well settled and needs no restatement in our hands that under article ..... 323-a of the constitution, enacted the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (act 13 of 1985) (for short 'the act') which inter alia provides for establishment of administrative tribunals. sections 14, 15 and 16 of the act deal with the jurisdiction, powers and authority of the central administrative tribunal, the state administrative tribunals and the joint administrative tribunals respectively. exclusive jurisdiction is conferred upon the tribunals under the act in respect of all service related matters. the administrative tribunal for a state shall exercise all .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2001 (HC)

Major S. Ravi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD839; 2001(6)ALT202; 93(2001)DLT647

..... vide its dated 7-1-1991 held that the survey of india cannot be held to be an armed force of the union and the finding to the contrary of the central administrative tribunal of hyderabad bench is not correct. it further held that even through the army engineers seconded permanently or otherwise to that organisation continue to be members of the armed force so long asthey are governed by the army act, the civilian employees unless drafted for active service or otherwise brought under the army act are not members of the armed force. since this judgment of the bangalore bench was accepted by the respondents, high court has got power .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2003 (HC)

Ministry of Defence, Senior Accounts Officer, Department of Administra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD251

..... of parliament or to the secretarial staff of any state legislature or a house thereof or in the case of a union territory having a legislature, of that legislature.' from bare perusal of section 2 it is clear that the provisions of the act are not made applicable to any member of the naval, military or air forces or any other armed forces of the union. but, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent who was applicant before the tribunal is not member of the naval, military or any other armed forces of the union. on the other hand the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that section 2 has to be read along with section 14 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2003 (HC)

B.V. Rami Reddy and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD339; 2003(5)ALT579

..... order (but not including the use of any naval, military or air force or any other armed force of the union or of any other force subject to the control of the union or of any contingent or unit thereof in aid of the civil power). ' therefore, the force created under the andhra pradesh special protection force act is not a force of which a mention is made in section 2(a) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. it is not sufficient that a particular force should be an armed force so as to remain out of the jurisdiction of the tribunal, it is further necessary that such armed force should be of the union of india. admittedly the petitioners do not belong .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2001 (HC)

G. Anantha Reddy Vs. Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD4; 2002(1)ALT279

..... force.52. what was questioned before the tribunal is the validity or otherwise of rule 3 of the said rules. the vires of rule 3 aforementioned has been questioned inter alia on the ground that no guideline has been provided therein and thereby an unbriddled and uncanalised power has been conferred.53. the said rules apply to every member of police force from the rank of police constables to the rank of inspector and were of equivalent ranks working in district armed forces (dar ..... they are transferred. under rule 4 of the said rules, the appointing authority for the transferees will be the same as that prescribed in the concerned special rules relating to the unit to which they are transferred. subsequent to the issuance of the act, 1985 and the rules, numbers of persons working in the category of inspectors of police were transferred from one zone to another on administrative grounds including the hyderabad city. such transfer orders did mention that the seniority of such transferees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2011 (HC)

B.Satyanarayana Vs. A.P.Administrative Tribunal and Others.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to adjudicate the matters pertaining the service conditions of apsrtc employees. this order is assailed in the writ petition. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the a.p.administrative tribunal act, 1985 (the act, for brevity) was enacted, section 2 excluded the members of naval, military or air forces or of any other armed forces of the union, any person governed by the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947, officers or servants of the supreme court or high courts or courts subordinate thereto, and the person appointed to the secretarial staff of either house of parliament or to the secretarial staff of any state legislature or a house thereof .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2003 (HC)

A. Srinivasa Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD134; 2003(2)ALT347

..... up. it is also contended that if any adverse decision is taken, which impinges the services of the members of the force, the proper forum to agitate such grievance is a.p. administrative tribunal, which is competent to deal with all the legal and constitutional issues. it is contended that when the petitioners did not challenge the validity of act 25 of 1991, they cannot equally challenge the powers of the state government to set up an armed force, more particularly in view of the fact that entry 'public order' and 'police' figure as entries 1 and 2 in the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1983 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Andhra Pradesh Police W ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1983)37CTR(AP)294; [1984]148ITR287(AP)

..... ]55itr722(sc) and ahmedabad rana caste association v. cit : [1971]82itr704(sc) . he further contended, inviting our attention to the statutory notification issues by the central government under s. 10(23c)(iv) of the act, whereunder certain funds like rehabilitation of ex-servicemen, armed forces reconstruction fund, indian goorkha ex-servicemen welfare fund, jawans welfare trust, maharashtra and so on, have been exempted from income-tax, that inasmuch as the defence services which form part of the government service ..... rs. 1,98,791 is exempt from income-tax for the assessment year 1975-76 ?' 2. before the above question was sought to be referred to this court at the instance of the revenue, m.p. no. 63/79 was filed by the assessee before the appellate tribunal for giving a decision with respect to the sum of rs. 1,98,791 which accrued as interest out of the principal sum of rs. 56,97,657 which the welfare society-assessee-kept in a bank. this arose because of the fact that earlier in i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2008 (HC)

V. Dharma Raju, Ex. Constable/C.i.S.F. Vs. Inspector General (S.W.S.), ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT71

..... turn to the owner that, by itself, cannot be the basis to hold him guilty of dereliction of duty or of indiscipline or of doing an act unbecoming of a member of an armed force, for it is only if he had committed an act of misconduct as enumerated under the rules and regulations governing his service, or had failed to act in accordance with the provisions of the cisf act would he be held guilty of misconduct. the question whether the petitioner's contention, that he was permitted to collect the dap ..... court. it is within these limits that the jurisdiction conferred under article 226 to issue a writ of certiorari can be legitimately exercised. where it is manifest or clear that the conclusion of law recorded by an inferior court or tribunal is expressly founded on reasons which are wrong in law, the said conclusion can be corrected by a writ of certiorari. to be amenable to correction in certiorari jurisdiction, the error committed by the court or authority, on whose judgment the high court .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //