Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: architects act 1972 section 7 validity of act or proceeding of council executive committee or other committees not to be invalidated by reason of vacancy etc Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 1 results (0.652 seconds)

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... petition is whether the atkt rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the minimum standards of architectural education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the architects act, 1972. 6. the learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated 8th september, 2004 of a division bench of this court in writ ..... course. (4) the second stage of the course shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) registration under the architects act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. the relevant university rule reads as under: rule no.5 : rules of a.t.k.t ..... (emphasis supplied) when one set of regulation is made by the council of architecture under the architects act, 1972 (which is a central legislation) and the other set of rules is made by the pune university under the maharashtra universities act, 1994 (which is a state legislation), we are of the view that the principles laid down .....

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

..... have been framed by the council of architecture and are, known as 'the architects act (professional misconduct) regulations, 1989, hereinto referred to as the conduct regulations. these have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under section 45 of the architects act, 1972. nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the ..... other candidates. the petitioner had disclosed that he has a ph.d. from ashwood university.under section 30 of the architects act, 1972, if on receipt of a complaint made to it, the council is of the opinion that any architect has been guilty of professional misconduct which, if proved, will render him unfit to practice ..... as an architect, the council may hold an inquiry in such manner as may be prescribed by rules. section 30 of the architects act, 1972 reads as under--30. procedure in inquiries relating to misconduct.-(1) when on receipt of a .....

Rajashree Bokade and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj571

..... the registration of the petitioners by accepting the renewal fee as per the provisions of section 23(3) of the architects act, 1972. 3. the petitioners, young lady architects, were conferred a degree ofbachelor of architecture by the nagpur university. respondent no. 3 - thecouncil of architecture functioning under section 3 of the architects act, 1972,had recognized the said degrees conferred by the nagpur university in 1989.the petitioners ..... are qualified and eligible to carry on theirprofession as architects in accordance with law. the petitioners' registrationunder section 23 of the architects act, 1972, is required, to be renewed annuallyunder section 27 of the act on payment of renewal fees. according to the petitioners, they have satisfied and complied with all the lawfully prescribedconditions under the provisions of the architects act and, therefore, they areentitled to carry on their .....

Meghana A.P. Desai (Smt.) and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR377

..... is not an exclusive responsibility of architects. hence, according to the learned counsel, the restriction impose in the note to rule 13 is arbitrary and ultra vires section 44. he next contend that, once permission ..... of persons who can sign the plans and application for construction of building and for restricting this class to architects only, specially when it clearly flows from the statement of objects and reasons for the bill submitted for the passing of the architects act, 1972, that engineers are not forbidden from designing plans for buildings and that the design, supervision and construction of buildings .....

Country Club (India) Ltd. Vs. Choudhury and Choudhury (India) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

..... items under claim no.1 and has determined also the rates payable therein which was exclusively within the domain of the project architect. he submits that the learned arbitrator has thus acted contrary to the provisions of the contract and thus the award deserves to be set aside on that ground alone. 29. ..... final measurement and final certification which was to be certified by the project architect. he submits that various findings recorded by the learned arbitrator are perverse and thus can be interfered with by this court under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. reasons and conclusions:- whether the learned arbitrator had travelled beyond the ..... also on the basis of the approval granted by the project architect of the petitioner. he submits that the findings of fact rendered by the learned arbitrator being not perverse, cannot be interfered with by this court under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. 66. insofar as the delay in making payment .....

Shri Bruno Dias Souza Son of Late Mr. Julio Souza Vs. State of Goa Rep ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj123

..... of price of goods delivered.40. present is a case of specialized and personal services of personal knowledge, expertise and skill. it is a selected and chosen architect.41. satisfaction of employer is an essential and inevitable ingredient before approval or sanction is accorded. doing and redoing again and again of various exercises was imperatively involved ..... of rates.(g) stage ii of working designs and preparation of the estimates was not progressed.(h) plaintiff has not been paid.(i) plaintiff issued notice under section 80 c.p.c. and due to failure of defendants to pay, and then the plaintiff has filed the suit.3. in order to appreciate plaintiff's ..... yet the government had failed in performing its obligation and hence, the plaintiff was entitled for being 'compensation towards breach' or 'restitution' towards the non gratuitous act done by him for the defendants.45. on the other hand, plaintiff's claim is for entitlement of amount is as per the expressed stipulations contained in the .....

Mr. Rajendra Thacker Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR1; (2004)106BOMLR598

..... + 7 floors. thus part 8th floor construction was beyond approval. hence, this office had issued stop work notice under section 354a of m.m.c. act on 27.9.2002.in response to the above action, owner through his architect applied to this office for regularisation of the work carried out beyond c.c. requested to (i) regularise the work carried ..... of the ward as under :in this case, owner mrs. nilam a. vazir through her architects m/s. pushkar consultants applied for building permission for stilt + 3 upper floors on 4.1.90 under section 337 of the m.m.c. act at plot bearing cts no, 284/21 of village marol, andheri (east). the said plot ..... greater mumbai, 1991. the municipal commissioner is required to give due regard to these aspects while deciding an application for retention under section 53(3) read with sections 44, 45 & section 46 of the said act.14. however, there might exist a situation where the municipal commissioner may be called upon to consider the regularisation of certain aspects .....

Motilal Tejsi and Co. Vs. Ramchandra Gajanan Kherodkar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1942Bom334; (1942)44BOMLR745

..... that their decision may be made a rule of the court. mr. somjee says that it is only an award made by the architects acting judicially as arbitrators that can be made a rule of the court.5. mr. somjee has also referred to clause (39) ..... , with new ones.15. it is to be noted that in this letter the defendant wanted the architects to act administratively and do certain administrative acts. the decision of the architects was not sought on any dispute between the parties. the next letter of august 11, 1938, makes ..... assuming that clause (4) of the contract amounts to an arbitration clause, it would not ipso facto oust the jurisdiction of the architects to give a certificate under clause (36) of the conditions of the contract unless mr. somjee satisfies me that there were disputes ..... think, does not hold any judicial duty to one or to the other. then if you add to that the last words of section 33, all that you find there is that his certificate as to the work done, the money to be paid and so on .....

Barses J.A. D'Douza Vs. the Municipal Corpn. of Gr. Brihan,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR594; 2003(6)BomCR846; 2004(1)CTLJ506(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj451

..... wants to act contrary to the directions of his principal i.e. the plaintiff ..... the plaintiff. the leaned counsel for the architect, who is the same as the counsel for defendant no. 3, when asked stated that the architect would act upon the instructions of the defendant no. 3 and not the plaintiff though bound under section 211 of the indian contract act. in other words, the architect who is agent wants to act contrary to the directions who is agent .....

Ghanshyam S/O Chandumal Harwani and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR386; 2007(6)BomCR239; 2007(5)MhLj25

..... than minimum required under development control rules. said violation is also mentioned in impugned communication. petitioners have not disputed correctness of this reason. moreover, the architect who drew map for sanction for them must be presumed to be aware of all this. petitioners cannot question no objection given by administrator of respondent no ..... vice chairman of the respondent no. 2 authority in appropriate cases will also have the power to take recourse to the provisions contained in section 40 of the said act.8. it is obvious that if construction itself cannot be sanctioned under development control rules or building bye-laws, the concept of deemed sanction ..... 11-2003 are incorrect. by counter affidavit, they have also denied service of rejection notice and contend that documents showing service of said order on their architect are fabricated. in their second counter filed on 24-4-2007, petitioners have pointed how with slight modifications problem about area of shop raised by .....