Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .12.2005 was communicated to the managing director of housing board, one part of the transaction was over. referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required ..... power of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 260 lacs besides, actual building construction ..... of attorney was also executed by the housing board in favour of the petitioner and possession was 7 handed over to the petitioner. the petitioner engaged an architect namely, m/s. axis, ranchi and the petitioner started the project with the projected investment of around rs. 1400 lacs besides, actual building construction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... background stating therein that this motivated public interest litigation has been filed to circumvent the provisions of the panchayat (extension to the scheduled areas) act 1996 provides section 4(g) which provides that all the seats of chairperson at all levels in the panchayat system shall be reserved for scheduled tribes in the ..... commissions, expert groups, individual studies, research papers, census data and the government after considering the vision, objects, goals, aims and the intention of the architects of the constitution behind the provisions of article 244 and the fifth schedule taken a conscious decision while declaring these areas as scheduled areas.16. on the ..... dutta & ors. vs. state of bihar & ors. (air1983pat 151). in the full bench of the hon ble patna high, the applicability of section 71 of the chhotanagpur tenancy act, 1908 and the constitutional validity of 1977 order was challenged to be declared ultra vires on the ground: (a) firstly because the fifth schedule of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... shall, therefore, be omitted for coming to a just and proper decision in this case. it has also been submitted that the petitioner was not the architect of the letter issued from the office of the registrar of university. it has also been submitted that since the claim of the petitioner was not ..... which was subject to improvement in the result of the petitioner within the next three years.11. the bihar state universities act, 1976 at section 35 lays down that notwithstanding anything contained in this act, no university or any college affiliated to such a university, except such college as is established, maintained or governed by the ..... necessary if the period for which such teacher is appointed extends beyond six months. sub section (2) of 1976 act was subsequently deleted by virtue of the bihar college service commission (amendment) act, 1996. the jharkhand state universities act, 2000 at section 57a lays down that the appointment of teachers of affiliated college not maintained by the .....
Tag this Judgment!