Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation act 2008 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 22,733 results (0.060 seconds)

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)21VST10(P& H)

..... provision for validation of tax already collected under the 2000 act, by treating the same to have been collected under the 2008 act, without ensuring appropriation of amount collected and already spent otherwise than by way of providing services to the payers and for the reasons for which the tax was held to be non-compensatory earlier, was liable to be ..... -(1) the proceeds of the levy under this act shall be appropriated to the fund to be notified by the government and shall be utilised exclusively for the development or facilitating the trade, commerce and industry in the state which shall include the following:(a) construction, development and ..... declaration to the effect that the haryana tax on entry of goods into local areas act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the 2008 act') is unconstitutional and void.2. ..... on april 16, 2008, the state of haryana repealed the 2000 act and enacted the haryana tax on entry of goods into local areas act, 2008, impugned in the ..... this petition and declare the provisions of the haryana tax on entry of goods into local areas act, 2008 to be unconstitutional and void. ..... on behalf of the petitioner is that the 2008 act is in substance re-enactment of the 2000 act and suffers from the same vice as its predecessor ..... appearing on behalf of the state opposed the submission on behalf of the petitioners and submitted that the 2008 act had remedied the defects pointed out in the judgment of this court and the levy under the new act was compensatory in nature. .....

Present: Ms. Ranjana Shahi Advocate Vs. M/S Doeacc Centre

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the learned commissioner as assessing authority vide its order dated 18.07.2008 confirmed the demand of interest on the delayed payment at appropriate rate under section 75 of the finance act, 1994 as well as penalty under section 76 and 77 of the finance act, 1994. ..... the present appeal under section 35g of the central excise act, 1994 (for short 'the act') arises out of an order passed by customs.excise and service tax appellate tribunal, new delhi on 18.01.2012 (for short 'the tribunal') (annexure a-2).the revenue has claimed the following substantial questions of law: (i) whether the .....

Navdeep Dhingra Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the return was processed and eventuality in scrutiny proceedings initiated after serving notices under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the act and after appropriating requisite information namely, the account books vide order dated 26.12.2008, the assessee's statements, the assessment was concluded by adding rs. ..... counsel for the assessee draws attention to office note (annexure-a6) dated 26.12.2008, wherein, the deputy commissioner of income tax has recorded that no other incriminating document except the slip pad has been recovered by the revenue ..... during a survey, under section 133a of the income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') on the business premises of m/s oscar remedies pvt. ..... the belated retracting of the admissions on 04.12.2008, nearly two years after the admissions and then also without any facts to support the allegation of coercion or pressure, cannot enure to the benefit of the ..... survey under section 133(a) of the act was conducted on 18.01.2006. ..... assessee retracted these admissions, on 04.12.2008 almost two years after the admissions and then also a few weeks before the passing of the assessment order on 26.12.2008. ..... no stage of the survey or assessment proceedings except at its fag end on 4.12.2008 i.e. ..... during pendency of assessment proceedings, the belated retraction does not detract from the voluntary nature of the admissions and, therefore, proceeded to include the admitted amount in the income of the assessee and frame assessment on 26.12.2008. .....

Wahidi Begum Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... counsel for the state made a faint attempt to argue that as 'the 1950 and 1954 acts' have been repealed on 06.09.2005 and the new enactments, namely, haryana evacuee properties (management and disposal) act, 2008/haryana evacuee properties (management and disposal) amendment act, 2010, do not contain any provision empowering any authority for restoration of land to any muslim restoree, ..... 2014.08.02 16:21 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.7234 of 1993 6 cannot be deprived of his legal right merely because in the new act passed in the year 2008/2010, the state has failed to discharge its obligation to provide a forum for the redressal of genuine grievances of the rightful claimants or to restore/allot land to the successful litigants ..... has supported the impugned orders and contended that '1954 act' has been repealed on 06.09.2005 and as per the new statute framed in 2008 i.e.haryana evacuee properties (management and disposal) act, 2008, there is no provision for any authority/forum to ..... commissioner, rehabilitation department, haryana whereby orders dated 31.07.1958, 28.09.1959 and june, 1963 passed by the central government under section 16 (1) of the administration of evacuee property act, 1950 (in short '1950 act') read with section 20-a kumar parveen 2014.08.02 16:21 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.7234 of 1993 2 of the displaced persons (compensation & rehabilitation ..... appropriate to reproduce section 16 of the '1950 act .....

Mrs.Nirmal Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2011(4)RCR(Cri)809; 2012(1)CriCC165

..... contended on behalf of the appellant that no fresh materials were collected subsequent to the earlier order refusing to sanction prosecution and the appropriate authority having applied its mind and having passed the said order, the subsequent order was wholly uncalled for and unjustified. ..... be similar consultation at t he stage of examining the question of granting sanction for prosecution and it shall be necessary and appropriate that the question of sanction be guided by and in accordance with the advice of the chief justice of india. ..... cost of repetition, the relevant extract in this regard is quoted as follows:- there shall be similar consultation at the stage of examining the question of granting sanction for prosecution and it shall be necessary and appropriate that the question of sanction be guided by and in accordance with the advice of chief justice of india. 65. ..... not disputed the factum of consultation with honble the chief justice of india, both at the stage of registration of fir against her and subsequent grant of sanction for prosecution, however, it is deemed appropriate to notice the circumstances, as are evident from the record produced before me. 20. ..... an fir no.250 of 2008 was registered at police station, sector 11, chandigarh under sections 11 and 12 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the act), section 120-b read with sections 192, 196, 199 and 200 of the indian penal code on the complaint of one amrik singh, peon of hon .....

Parminder Singh @ Pamma Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... has been filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing of fir no.149 dated 26.10.2008, registered at police station division no.2, jalandhar, under sections 336/506 of the indian penal code (section 25/27/54/59 of arms act added subsequently).along with all consequential proceedings arising thereform, on the basis of compromise dated 12.11.2008 (annexure p-2).vide order dated 20.12.2012, notice of motion was issued and parties were directed to get ..... continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of the criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and wrongdoer and to secure the ends of justice, therefore, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end. ..... not m-40669 of 2012 /3/ quashed on the basis of compromise dated 12.11.2008 (annexure p-2).and all the criminal proceedings arising from the said fir also ..... above, fir no.149 dated 26.10.2008, registered at police station division no.2, jalandhar, under sections 336/506 of the indian penal code (section 25/27/54/59 of arms act added subsequently).is hereby crl. ..... consequently, in view of compromise dated 12.11.2008 (annexure p-2).submission of untraced report and keeping in view the law laid down by the hon'ble apex court in the case of madan mohan abbot versus state of punjab, 2008(2) rcr (criminal) 429, which has been affirmed by a larger bench of the hon'ble supreme court in gian singh versus state of punjab and another, .....

Rent or Damage That the Owners of Land Would Be Vs. Jasmer Singh ..... ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... court, in situations where possessions have been taken prior to issuance of notification under section 4 (1) of the act, can direct the collector to examine the extent of singh varinder 2013.08.27 16:36 rfa no.3384 of 2008 (5) i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab & haryana high court at chandigarh rent or damage that the owners of land would be entitled to, the provisions of section 48 of the act would come to aid and the court would also be justified in issuing appropriate direction. ..... singh varinder 2013.08.27 16:36 rfa no.3384 of 2008 (6) i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab & haryana high court at chandigarh iii) for compensation on account of use and occupation of the land before issuance of notification under section 4 of the act, the landowners shall be entitled to file application before the collector concerned upto 30.9. ..... singh varinder 2013.08.27 16:36 rfa no.3384 of 2008 (4) i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab & haryana high court at chandigarh as far as claim of the landowners for damages on account of use and occupation of the land as possession thereof was taken prior to issuance of notification under section 4 of the act in the present case is concerned, the fact that possession was taken prior to the acquisition is not in ..... on reference under section 18 of the act, the learned court below vide award dated 30.1.2008, determined the market value of the acquired land at ` 21,59,000/- per .....

Dharam Pal and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR32

..... court required the collector to go into the following questions:(a) was the possession of any of the lands in dispute taken by the state, under the utilization of lands act, 1949 and pattas duly executed under section 5 of the act in favour of the alleged lessee'(b) were any proceedings for awarding compensation under section 4 of the act taken in respect of the land alleged to have been leased, and if so, on what basis were the persons dispossessed compensated? ..... we proceed to decide these petitions it would be appropriate to revisit the provisions of east punjab utilization of lands act, 1949. ..... the supreme court was impressed by the petitioners' argument that the provisions of east punjab utilization act, 1949 had not been correctly observed and the matter was required to be re-examined by the ..... this petition was filed on march 13, 2008 to challenge the collector's order dated september 15, 2003 and all further orders passed in appeal/revision/review ..... review application was dismissed on february 28, 2008 which rendered the petition infructuous.8. ..... 109 of 2008 before this court which was disposed of on january 8, 2008 with a direction to the collector to decide the petitioners' representation dated november 26, 2007 within one ..... 3998 and 3999 of 2008) which arise on the basis of similar facts and raise the same grounds of ..... 2360 of 2008 before this court praying for stay of dispossession till the decision of the review ..... in 2008, the petitioners have finally reached the end of the .....

Jagtar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... a sequel to the above discussion, the instant petition succeed and the impugned notification under section 4 read with section 17(2)(c) of the act, dated 9.5.2008 (p-6), declaration under section 6 read with section 17 of the act, dated 12.9.2008 (p-7) and all the subsequent proceedings pursuance to such declaration are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. ..... however, the chief minister, haryana, did not deem it appropriate to set up the sewerage treatment plant inside the abadi area, as is evident from the letter dated 4.1.2008 (p-4), sent by the financial commissioner and principal secretary to government haryana, pwd (water supply and ..... but then that is not language of the section which in our opinion requires the appropriate government to further consider the need for dispensing with 5a inquiry in spite of the existence of unforeseen ..... in the case of any land to which, in the opinion of the appropriate government, the provisions of sub-section (1) or subsection (2) are applicable, the appropriate government may direct that the provisions of section 5-a shall not apply, and if it does do direct, a declaration may be made under section 6 in respect of the land at any time after the date of the publication of the ..... it is evident from letter dated 4.1.2008 (p-4), that the chief minister was of the opinion that treatment plant inside the abadi area was not an appropriate option and he had desired that other suitable site be located by the department for setting up of sewerage treatment .....

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited and Another Vs. Rama R ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... on the rank and file of the court at chandigarh and ultimately, vide order dated 6.6.2008, it was returned for filing the same before the appropriate court i.e.before the district judge, faridkot. ..... counsel has further contended that though the order for returning the plaint was passed on 6.6.2008, but actually the plaint was returned on 22.7.2008 and the same was presented before the district judge, faridkot on 25.7.2008 i.e.within three days, but this fact was not taken into consideration by the additional district ..... it is observed that if the additional district judge, chandigarh had actually returned the plaint on 22.7.2008, then to present the same within one month was not within the control of the appellant. ..... made by the apex court in two judgments, the trial court observed as f.a.o.no.553 of 2010 (o&m) -2- under :- since the petition was returned on 6.6.2008, the petitioner was required to present the same at faridkot immediately or within a reasonable time. ..... in the said court on 25.7.2008, as such, the petitioner sought condonation of delay in filing the objection petition while claiming disability under section 14 of the limitation act. ..... even under section 34 of the act, the court could allow a period of only 30 days to present the petition after the expiry of three months ..... judgments 230 (sc) wherein it was observed that where the petitioner was prosecuting remedy in wrong forum he is entitled for the exclusion of the time spent there under section 14 of the limitation act. .....