Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation act 2006 Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 1 of about 899 results (0.052 seconds)

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

Banshi Lal Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... state, more particularly with reference to barmer district, attributing total apathy and callousness on part of food inspectors for observance of food safety and standards act, 2006 (for short, act of 2006 ) and the rules made thereunder, the petitioner has laid this writ petition with the under-mentioned prayers.a) by an appropriate; writs, orders or directions of this hon'ble court, the respondent no.1 to 4, may kindly be directed, to immediately post a suitable food safety officer alongwith allied ..... d) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, in the nature thereof, the respondent no.1 to 4, may very kindly be directed to constitute a committee, for carrying out suitable enquiry/assessments of the food checking of food centers.in barmer, for last 5 years.so as to know, whether the provisions of the act of 2006 and rules of 2011, are being meticulously adhered to, in true letter and spirits, by the food safety officers.deputed by the government. ..... c) by an appropriate; writs, orders or directions of this hon'ble court, the respondent no.1 to 4, may very kindly be directed to uniformly take action to implement the provisions of the act of 2006 and rules of 2011, in the matter of food checking of all the food institutions, without causing any discrimination, in barmer district, as well in whole of rajashan, so as to ensure that, no health hazards is occasioned, to public. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2015 (HC)

Hari Singh Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... a perusal of the record shows that on 25.6.2014, the superintendent of police jaisalmer addressed a letter to the district magistrate wherein a request was made to take appropriate action under section 3(2) of the act of 2006 on account of the fact that the petitioner was disrupting public order and was indulging in anti- social activities. ..... on account of this behavior, the district magistrate concluded that it would be appropriate to detain the 8 petitioner under section 3(2) of the act of 2006. ..... it is submitted that the petitioner has been detained as per the provisions prescribed in the act of 2006, since it has been found 3 that the petitioner was indulging in theft of electricity supply ..... state government, thereafter, authorised the district magistrate, jaisalmer to exercise the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act of 2006, vide notification dated 30.7.2014 which is placed on record as annex. r/3. ..... main thrust of the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while passing the order of detention dated 27.1.2015, there has been non-compliance of section 3(1) of the act of 2006 in so far as there has been no application of mind. ..... the petitioner has been detained in district jail, jaisalmer on the basis of an order dated 27.1.2015 issued by the district magistrate, jaisalmer while exercising powers under 2 section 3(2) of the rajasthan prevention of anti-social activities act, 2006 (act no.1/2008) ( for short 'the act of 2006'). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2015 (HC)

Poonam Chand Bhadu Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the detenu tola ram, it cannot be said that the case of detenu tola ram falls in any of the category for the purpose of detention of one year because the section 3 of the act of 2006 provides that district collector can exercise its 3 powers but those powers are required to be delegated to the district collector by the state government after recording satisfaction that it is necessary to do so ..... of detention order was communicated to the detenu tola ram, thereafter, a representation was filed by him and same was considered by the advisory board constituted under section 10 of the act of 2006 and, thereafter, the advisory board granted an opportunity of hearing to the detenu tola ram and vide order dated 11.8.2014 the advisory board gave its opinion that detention order is ..... the superintendent of police, bikaner moved a complaint against detenu tola ram on 24.1.2014 before the district magistarte, bikaner to take action against him under the act of 2006 and after considering the anti social activities in various parts of district bikaner, the state government authorized district magistrate, bikaner to exercise power under section 3(1) of the ..... act of 2006 vide notification dated 16.5.2014 and thereafter, the district magistrate, bikaner perused the criminal record of detenu tola ram and after applying judicious mind and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2015 (HC)

Dinesh Bothra Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... in view the persistent conflict between the state regulations and the central notifications, it is imperative for us to issue directions specially to provide for an interim period, during which appropriate steps should be taken to comply with the judgment of the hon ble supreme court and to issue notifications which are necessary in that regard. ..... preparation and approval of mine plan, as in the case of major minerals may appropriately be provided in the rules governing the mining of minor minerals by the respective ..... we direct that in the meeting it shall also disused and appropriate recommendations be made and placed before the tribunal, as to whether riverbed mining covering an area of less than 5 hectares can be permitted, if so, the conditions and regulatory ..... cluster within a period of three months of formation of association through recognised person and submitted to the district level environmental committee for approval: provided that the director may in appropriate case extend above period up to a further period of six months. ..... the ministry of environment and forests (moef) vide notification dated 14th september, 2006 issued under sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986 and sub-section (1) and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, in supersession of its earlier notification dated 27th january, 1994, except in respect of things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, directed that on and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2015 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and Others Vs. Saroj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... umadevi(3)1 cannot be held to have overridden the powers of industrial and labour courts in passing appropriate order under section 30 of the mrtu and pulp act, once unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under item 6 of schedule iv ..... the powers conferred under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution of india providing for regularization of the services of those daily wagers, who had completed ten years of service on 10.4.2006 (the date on which the judgment in secretary, state of karnataka and others v/s umadev ((2006) 4 scc 1) was rendered by the constitution bench of the supreme court), without intervention of any court or tribunal, and were continuously working as such on the date of commencement ..... amendment of rule 6 by the rajasthan class iv service (recruitment and other service conditions) (amendment) rules, 2009 (for short, the rules of 2009 ), a person has to be in continuous service for a period of ten years upto 10.4.2006, without the intervention of any court or tribunal, to seek the benefit of regularization. 9. ..... the workman had completed ten years of service on 10.4.2006, when the rajasthan various service (amendment) rules of 2009 ..... umadevi (2006) 4 scc 1 does not denude the industrial and labour courts of their statutory power under section 30 read with section 32 of the mrtu and pulp act to order permanency of the workers who have been victim of unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under item 6 of schedule iv where the posts on which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2014 (HC)

Om Prakash Bhadu and anr Vs. State (Urban Deve.) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... in this public interest litigation, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- (i) the pil application may kindly be allowed and; (ii) that an appropriate writ, direction and order may be issued against the respondents to act upon the recommendation of public grievances redressal committee vide annexure-5 dated 8.12.2010 and ensure access from ganganagar-hanumangarh road to ganganagar-suratgarh road (national highway15) through inter-connecting road in front of jagdamba ..... authorised officer of the uit had thereafter issued a notice under section 90-b of the rajasthan land revenue act to original khatedars.this case was decided by the authority vide its order dated 11.9.2000. ..... versus state government & ors.date of order ::: 28.08.2014 present hon'ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice vijay bishnoi mr.om prakash bhadu, petitioner no.1 present in person none present for respondents _____ by the court: we have heard the petitioner no.1 appearing in ..... andh vidhyalaya sr.ganganagar as finding mention in proposed master plan of 2001 and approved plan of 2 2004 deeming the sale deeds dated 27.3.2001 and 03.06.2006 vide annexures -12 & 13 with respect to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2015 (HC)

Dr.(Smt.) Tej Sharma Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is employed in such a centre, laboratory or clinic and renders his professional or technical services to or at such a centre, laboratory or clinic, whether on an honorary basis or otherwise, and who contravences any of the provisions of this act or rules made thereunder shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which ..... the next argument of the petitioners that the complaints against them have not been filed by the appropriate authority or by the authorized person is without any merit because in every complaint, the person, who has submitted the complaint has clearly ..... so far as the contention of the 31 petitioners that non-reaching of form-f to the appropriate authority before the fifth day of the month cannot be termed as a contravention of sub-rule (8) of rule 9 is concerned, the same is also liable to be rejected in view of the decision of coordinate bench ..... specific penalty has been provided for certain class of persons, who are referred in section 23 on contravention of any provision of the pcpndt act and the rules made thereunder, whereas no penalty has been provided for others, if they do the same and section 25 is there to ..... constitution of 'appropriate authority' under section 17 is clearly meant to ensure proper and vigorous implementation of the act; and it is expressly prescribed as one of its functions to take legal action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2015 (HC)

Dr.Sushil Kumar Aaseri Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is employed in such a centre, laboratory or clinic and renders his professional or technical services to or at such a centre, laboratory or clinic, whether on an honorary basis or otherwise, and who contravences any of the provisions of this act or rules made thereunder shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which ..... the next argument of the petitioners that the complaints against them have not been filed by the appropriate authority or by the authorized person is without any merit because in every complaint, the person, who has submitted the complaint has clearly ..... so far as the contention of the 31 petitioners that non-reaching of form-f to the appropriate authority before the fifth day of the month cannot be termed as a contravention of sub-rule (8) of rule 9 is concerned, the same is also liable to be rejected in view of the decision of coordinate bench ..... specific penalty has been provided for certain class of persons, who are referred in section 23 on contravention of any provision of the pcpndt act and the rules made thereunder, whereas no penalty has been provided for others, if they do the same and section 25 is there to ..... constitution of 'appropriate authority' under section 17 is clearly meant to ensure proper and vigorous implementation of the act; and it is expressly prescribed as one of its functions to take legal action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2015 (HC)

Dr.S.P.Gupta Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is employed in such a centre, laboratory or clinic and renders his professional or technical services to or at such a centre, laboratory or clinic, whether on an honorary basis or otherwise, and who contravences any of the provisions of this act or rules made thereunder shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which ..... the next argument of the petitioners that the complaints against them have not been filed by the appropriate authority or by the authorized person is without any merit because in every complaint, the person, who has submitted the complaint has clearly ..... so far as the contention of the 31 petitioners that non-reaching of form-f to the appropriate authority before the fifth day of the month cannot be termed as a contravention of sub-rule (8) of rule 9 is concerned, the same is also liable to be rejected in view of the decision of coordinate bench ..... specific penalty has been provided for certain class of persons, who are referred in section 23 on contravention of any provision of the pcpndt act and the rules made thereunder, whereas no penalty has been provided for others, if they do the same and section 25 is there to ..... constitution of 'appropriate authority' under section 17 is clearly meant to ensure proper and vigorous implementation of the act; and it is expressly prescribed as one of its functions to take legal action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2015 (HC)

Dr.Surendra Sharma and Anr Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is employed in such a centre, laboratory or clinic and renders his professional or technical services to or at such a centre, laboratory or clinic, whether on an honorary basis or otherwise, and who contravences any of the provisions of this act or rules made thereunder shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which ..... the next argument of the petitioners that the complaints against them have not been filed by the appropriate authority or by the authorized person is without any merit because in every complaint, the person, who has submitted the complaint has clearly ..... so far as the contention of the 31 petitioners that non-reaching of form-f to the appropriate authority before the fifth day of the month cannot be termed as a contravention of sub-rule (8) of rule 9 is concerned, the same is also liable to be rejected in view of the decision of coordinate bench ..... specific penalty has been provided for certain class of persons, who are referred in section 23 on contravention of any provision of the pcpndt act and the rules made thereunder, whereas no penalty has been provided for others, if they do the same and section 25 is there to ..... constitution of 'appropriate authority' under section 17 is clearly meant to ensure proper and vigorous implementation of the act; and it is expressly prescribed as one of its functions to take legal action .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //