Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apartment ownership act 1972 section 4 status of apartments Page 11 of about 1,444 results (0.093 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Omkara Ashrama Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A M Narayanaswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

T B Ramesha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Shri. Chanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1955 (HC)

P.S. Ranga Iyer Vs. Chidambara Iyer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1956)1MLJ503

..... paragraph (c) can apply only when the mortgage interest is owned by two or more persons and there is a partition among them and since according to section 3, sub-section 1, of the madras agriculturists relief act, a 'person' includes an undivided hindu family, in the present case if the ownership of the mortgage vested in the undivided family that would mean only one person and as such there is no ownership of mortgage in two or more persons with the result that paragraph (c) cannot apply. ..... out of the properties which had already been divided as mentioned in paragraph 2 above and other properties then kept in common and subsequently acquired, the properties in i schedule has been set apart for private trust created by the common family and the said schedules have been signed by all of us. ..... the argument put forward in the court below that the word ' partition ' in section 9-a (10)(ii)(c) of the act being applicable to the entire population of the state of madras irrespective of creed, community or faith, it should be interpreted as meaning complete division by metes and bounds and not a division in status as applied to joint hindu families did not appeal to the learned subordinate judge who held that the word ' partition ' has to be construed with regard to the particular family in which it takes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (HC)

Om Prakash Singhal Vs. K.L. Kurian

Court : Delhi

..... parvesh kumar kohli on 18.03.1996, though the deed of apartment with respect to the flat in favour of the plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of the delhi apartment ownership act, 1986 is still to be executed; (b) that the said flat also stands mutated in the records of the municipal authorities in the name of the plaintiff and the plaintiff has been paying property tax with respect ..... no sale deed of the flat in favour of the plaintiff but the apartment act, application whereof is not controverted by counsel for defendant, vide section 4 thereof, vests ownership rights in favour of such allottees/transferees of apartments/such flats. ..... lost sight of that it is the plaintiff who is the transferee of the flat under the agreement to sell aforesaid and not the son of the plaintiff and thus under the provisions of apartment act also, the ownership of the flat would vest in the plaintiff.22. ..... the plaintiff commenced arguments by stating that though the defendant has claimed his wife to be the owner but has not filed a single document in support thereof and since the plea of ownership of the wife is based on a baynama executed by the son of the plaintiff and which has not been filed, no issue needs to be framed thereon.8. ..... said flat and the defendant along with his wife is residing in the said flat since january, 2004, in the capacity of owner; (iv) that the plaintiff has not filed any proof of his ownership of the said flat; (v) that the said flat was transferred in favour of ms. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2019 (HC)

Vijay Building Apartment Owners Association vs.ardee Housing Pvt Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

..... further, the intention behind the legislations such as the delhi apartment ownership act, 1986; real estate (regulation and development) act, 2016 and other recent reforms in the real estate sector, cannot ..... the responsibility of the promoter/builder to do so as provided in section 13(2) of the act and also to deliver a certified copy of the registered deed to the owner of the apartment after it is registered. ..... of apartment: i) the promoter/builder shall in all cases where the transfer has taken place under the sale deed/lease cs os12612015 page 21 of 37 deed/transfer by endorsement, prior to the date of the order, which may be passed by this court, execute the deed of apartment in the proformas as may be approved and issued by the competent authority keeping in view the provisions of section 13(1) of the act. ..... shall prepare necessary proformas for this purpose and issue directions to execute the deed of apartments in the said proformas, keeping in view the provisions of section 13(1) of the act. ..... the submission of the defendants, that no mandatory injunction can be granted and only status quo ante can be restored, is an observation made by the supreme court in ..... apartment owners association: the competent authority shall send specific notice to all multi-storeyed apartments informing the owners of apartments that it is their right to form owners- association in accordance with the bye-laws as per the explanation b of chapter 1 of the said bye-laws under section 15 (2) of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3owners association an assoiciation registered under the karnataka apartment ownership act, 1972 club house block adarsh palm retreat condominiums phase3 deverabisanahalli bellandur , bengaluru 560 103 ..... the appellant is a land grabber the first respondent must aver and prove both the ingredients -- the factum as well as the intention -- that the appellant falls in the categories of the persons, mentioned above (clause (d) of section 2 of the act), has occupied the land in dispute, which belonged to the first respondent, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to or with the intention of illegally taking possession of such land or entering into the land ..... for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (e) of section 2 of the act, summarised above.27.3 section 3 of klgp act-2011 states that 'land grabbing' in any form is prohibited and is declared unlawful and any activity connected with or arising out of land grabbing to be an offence, which would be punishable under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //