Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: anti hijacking amendment act 1994 Page 4 of about 50,608 results (0.324 seconds)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Dr. H.S. Hanumanthappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR642; 1996(7)KarLJ1

..... is whether the learned single judge was right in concluding that respondent-1 is entitled to a declaration that the final notification should be struck down and the proceedings completed under the land acquisition act, should be declared as null and void in view of the fact that some of the lands proposed to be acquired in accordance with the final notification, were released.7. ..... respondent-1 tiled a rejoinder on december 12, 1991, asserting that the averments made in -the original petition and the amendment application were correct and also producing a list of housing co-operative societies which were given plots of land for construction ..... the authority denied various averments made in the petition and the amendment application and claimed that the petition should not be entertained on the ground of ..... indeed, the petition and the amendment application are extremely vague and except making a general and bald allegation that the authority has released the lands, the ..... 'in answer to the petition and the amendment application, the authority filed return sworn ..... respondent-1 then sets out in the amendment application that land ad-measuring 61 acres 26 1/2 guntas was released by the government by order ..... the amended prayer made by the amendment application reads as follows:'to quash by the issue of a writ of certiorari the final notification dated august 31, 1978, in so far as the petitioner is concerned as being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india as it was done in .....

Sarwarlal and ors. Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC862; [1960]3SCR311

..... it may also be observed that the parliament has, by the constitution (1st amendment) act, included the abolition and the commutation regulations in the ninth schedule, and by virtue of art. ..... the constitution was amended on june 18, 1951 by the constitution (first amendment) act of 1951 whereby, inter alia, arts. ..... after the amendment of the constitution, the petition was amended on august 14, 1952. ..... , the military governor was invested with all authority of his exalted highness the nizam in the matter of administration of the state in all its departments, the sovereignty of his exalted highness the nizam was, by this act of delegation, undoubtedly not extinguished. ..... 6 of the abolition regulation, possession of the jagirs was taken over sometime in september 1949 by the jagir administrator acting on behalf of the state of hyderabad. 5. .....

Common Cause Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi257; [1998(79)FLR954]

..... moreover, the constitution (seventy-fifth amendment) act, 1994 was passed to enable the state governments to set up state-level rent, tribunals for speedy disposal of rent cases by excluding the jurisdiction of all courts except the supreme court. 3. ..... on february 5, 1994 the president of india assented to the constitution (seventy-first amendment) act, 1994, in order to enable the state governments to set up state level rent tribunals for speedy disposal of rent cases. ..... roy's case (supra) it was contended that since the central government failed to exercise its powers to bring the 44th constitution amendment act, 1978 into force within a reasonable time and had delayed its implementation, a direction should be issued calling upon the central government to discharge its duty. ..... roy's case (supra) the supreme court observed that the parliament by leaving to the central government to decide as to when the various provisions of the 44th constitution amendment act, 1978 should be brought into force, could not have intended the central government to exercise a kind of veto over its constituent will by not ever bringing the amendment or some of its provisions into force. ..... the supreme court, however, by a majority of three is to two declined to issue the mandamus to the central government to bring into force the various provisions of the said act, but expressed hope that the central government will without further delay bring the 44th constitution amendment act into force. .....

Mehta Rameshchandra Manilal Vs. Spl Land Acquisition Officer

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3672

..... umesh trivedi, learned agp that so far as the state of gujarat is concerned, the state amendment has been made under section 11-a of gujarat state amendment act in he land acquisition act (gujarat act 20 of 1965 dated 16.8.1965). ..... we may observe that in this case the attention of the division bench was not invited to the provisions of section 11-a of the gujarat state amendment act in the land acquisition act, the court proceeded to decide this question on the basis of the case under maharashtra act decided by the supreme court i.e. ..... whereas all these 27 appeals (13 by the land owners - claimants and 14 by the acquiring body) are directed against the common judgment and order dated 29th of october, 1994 and the same have been heard together and they involve common questions, we propose to decide all these 27 first appeals by this common judgment and order as under.3. ..... 27 appeals in all, are all directed against the common judgment and award dated 29th of october, 1994, passed by the joint district judge, ahmedabad (rural) in land acquisition cases no. ..... meter as against the rate of rs.70.00 and 72.00 per sq meter as determined by the reference court.the acquiring body on the other hand has challenged the impugned judgment and award dated 29th october, 1994 and has prayed that the award of compensation at the rate of rs. ..... 2136 of 1994 to 2142 of 1995 ..... the land owners claimants as well as the acquiring body are aggrieved against this common judgment and order dated 29th of october, 1994.2. .....

S. Saraswathi and ors. Vs. the State Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ200

..... was challenged as being repugnant to the code of criminal procedure, 1898, prevention of corruption act, 1947 and criminal law (amendment) act, 1952 and laid down the test thus: (1) where the provisions of a central act and a state act in the concurrent list are fully inconsistent and are absolutely irreconcilable, the central act will (italics supplied) prevail and the state act will become void in view of the repugnancy; (2) where, however, a law passed by the state comes ..... govindarajan, having taken note of the fact that the said tamil nadu amendment act 16 of 1997 has received the assent of the president of india on 14.03.1997, has held that by virtue of the assent obtained from the president subsequent to the amendment act, it cannot be said that no time limit has been stipulated under the principal act and therefore the state act cannot operate against the same.18. ..... the apex court taking into consideration of the amendment made by the parliament under the amendment act 68 of 1984, has come to the conclusion that in view of the said enactment made by the parliament under the amendment act 68 of 1984, the earlier amendment by the state cannot operate inconsistent to the subsequent - amendment of the parliament.7. .....

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... --notwithstanding anything in this part, any provision of any law relating to co-operative societies in force in a state immediately before the commencement of the constitution (ninety-seventh amendment) act, 2011, which is inconsistent with the provisions of this part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed by a competent legislature or other competent authority or until the expiration of one year from such commencement, whichever is less. ..... state of tamil nadu) and what could not be achieved through section 89a of the act, the state seeks to achieve the same by the amendment and hence, the amended act is a colourable piece of legislation and is contrary to the decision reported in 2006 (1) ctc 1 (k.nithyanandam v. ..... while matters stood thus, under the constitution (97th amendment) act, 2011, article 19(1)(c) was amended, making the right to form an association or co-operative society, a fundamental right. ..... . recognising the fact that the ultimate authority rested on the members consisting the society which is a body corporate, the amending act merely regulated a situation brought about by the absence of a board.173 ..... it may be noted herein that under section 21(2) of the act, as it stood prior to the impugned amending act, admission of new member was to be done only by the board. ..... on 16.11.2012, the amendment made through the ordinance was carried through under the amending act under the tamil nadu co-operative societies (third amendment) act, 2012 (act 37 of 2012). .....

i.Ravichandran Vs. State

Court : Chennai

..... writ petition directing the government for reconveyance of the lands in question was set aside and the writ appeals were disposed of with a direction that the government is entitled to invoke section 16-b of the tamil nadu amendment act and on satisfying itself, it can forfeit the lands in question as penalty from the housing board and in the event the government exercises the above power and consequently the lands vests in the government, the ..... of the case, the respondents are entitled for reconveyance of the land especially when the government had not so far forfeited the lands in exercise of the power conferred under section 16b of the tamil nadu amendment act to the land acquisition act and (ii) whether the reasons adduced by the government in the impugned orders are justifiable? 12. ..... the government is entitled to invoke section 16b of the tamil nadu amendment act and on satisfying itself it can forfeit the lands in question as penalty from the housing board. ..... provisions of section 48-b of the tamil nadu amendment act, 1996, firstly, the land must vest with the government under the act in revenue department, and secondly, in the opinion of the state government, such land is not required for any other public purpose and thirdly, the said land can be re-conveyed to the original owner who is willing to repay the amount that was paid to him under the act for the acquisition of such land .....

Lawyers Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Shri Krishna Grih Nirman ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2890

..... indicate that the court should satisfy itself that the defendant had notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer plaintiffs claim, while the second proviso added by allahabad amendment prior to 1976 amendment act. ..... amendment act, 1976, are compared, it would appear that the words 'or but for his wilful conduct would have known of the date of hearing' occurring in allahabad amendment was purposely omitted by c.p.c. ..... amendment by amendment act, 1976 and second proviso added by c.p.c. ..... second proviso to rule 13 of order ix as amended by amendment act no. ..... amendment act of 1976, the satisfaction of the court should be that the defendant had the notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer plaintiff's claim. 17. ..... amendment act of 1976, read as follows : 'provided also that no such decree shall be set aside merely on the ground of irregularity in service of summons, if the court is satisfied that the defendant knew or, but for his wilful conduct would ..... 1 came to know about the decree of the suit for the first time on 19.1.1994, when the applicant's pairokar devi prasad informed to its secretary that he had obtained decree and was getting the sale deed executed. ..... the plaintiff of the suit has filed this revision against the order dated 31,10.1994 passed by viiith additional civil judge, agra in misc. ..... 1 got the file inspected on 25.1.1994 and moved the application. 3. ..... 12 of 1994, allowing the application of the respondent no. .....

Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC3148; 2008(3)ALD147(SC); 2008(56)BLJR1811; 148(2008)DLT705(SC); JT2008(5)SC376; 2008(6)SCALE325; (2008)5SCC287; 2008(3)ICC326; 2008(3)Supreme37; 2008AIRSCW3324; 2008AIRSCW3324; 2008(3)ICC326; 2008(3)Supreme37

..... moreover, the constitution (seventy-fifth amendment) act, 1994 was passed to enable the state governments to set up state-level rent tribunals for speedy disposal of rent cases by excluding the jurisdiction of all courts except the supreme court.3 ..... in harbilas rai bansal this court held in very clear terms that the classification created by the amendment act, 1956, by which the words 'a non-residential building or' occurring in section 13(3)(a)(ii) were deleted and certain other amendments had been made, had no reasonable nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the act and consequently the provisions of the amendment act were violative of article 14 of the constitution.24. ..... we have no doubt in our mind that the objects, reasons and the scheme of the act could not have envisaged the type of situation created by the amendment which is patently harsh and grossly unjust for the landlord of a non-residential premises.22. ..... this court referred to the unamended and amended section 13(1)(a) of the punjab act and observed:the scheme of the act, unmistakably aims at regulating the conditions of tenancy, controlling the rents and preventing unreasonable and mala fide eviction of tenants of the residential and non-residential buildings ..... (supra), the supreme court examined the constitutionality of the amendment made in the punjab act, whereby the landlord was deprived of his right to seek eviction of tenant from non-residential building on the ground of bonafide requirement for his own .....

Raghunandan Saran Ashok Saran (Huf) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)261; 95(2002)DLT508; 2002(61)DRJ457; 2002RLR149

..... moreover, the constitution (seventy-fifth amendment) act, 1994 was passed to enable the stategovernments to set up state-level rent tribunals for speedy disposal of rentcases by excluding the ..... five years commencing from the date of such letting out, (c) in the case of any premises, whether residential or otherwise,constructed on or after the commencement of the delhi rent control (amendment)act, 1988 and to which the provisions of the instant act are made applicable by virtue of clause (d) of section 3 thereof, the rent calculated on the basis of ten percent of the aggregate amount of the actual cost of construction of the ..... , (b) in the case of any premises, whether residential or not, constructed on or after the 9thday of june, 1955, including premises constructed after the commencement of the act but before the commencement of the delhi rent control (amendment) act,1988, the annual rent calculated with reference to the rent agreed upon between thelandlord and the tenant when such premises were first let out is to be deemed to be ..... the case of any premises, whether residential or not, constructed or after the 9th day of june, 1955, including premises constructed after the commencement of this act but before the commencement of the delhi rent control (amendment) act, 1988, the annual rent calculated with reference to the rent agreed upon between the landlord and the tenant when such premises were first let out shall be ..... rent control(amendment) act 57 and 1988.rent in 1994 as per .....