Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: animal disease control act 1961 chapter 1 preliminary Page 98 of about 38,954 results (0.440 seconds)

Feb 02 2006 (HC)

Parmar Dipubhai B. and 10 ors. Vs. Registraqr of Co-operative Societie ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1615

..... co. v. rusterholz d.c. minn 41 f. supp 398, 505). another meaning of the term 'management', may be: 'the act or acts of managing or governing by direction, guidance, superintendence, regulation and control the affairs of a society'.37. be that as it may, what has been directly bidden 'out-of-bounds' for the registrar by ..... administrative power upon society in relation to service condition of employees or recruitment procedure or appointments of such petitioners. scheme of the act is very much clear that the registrar is having control only in respect of the matters relating to constitution, management and business of the society and beyond that, registrar is not ..... having any control over the society. these parameters, disputes between employees and society relating to service condition is clearly out side the scope of section 96 of the act, therefore, section 160 is required to be kept in mind while considering the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mool Chand Salecha

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1303; 2002(5)WLN346

..... thereto, can exercise the powers conferred under sub-section (1). sub-section (3) empowers the income-tax officer to issue prohibitory orders on a person in control of books of account, documents, valuable article, etc., directing him not to remove, part with or otherwise deal with them without his permission, if he finds ..... the high court within its territorial jurisdiction and the supreme court. however, it is also the settled position of law that in deciding appeals, the tribunal acts as an appellate authority virtually in the same position as an assessing officer subject to the limitation, if any, placed on their jurisdiction by the relevant ..... production of evidence, etc.--(1) the assessing officer, deputy commissioner (appeals), joint commissioner, commissioner (appeals) and chief commissioner or commissioner shall, for the purposes of this act, have the same powers as are vested in a court under the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), when trying a suit in respect of ,the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1966 (HC)

N. Krishnaraju Reddiar and ors. Vs. Authorised Officer, Land Reforms, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1967Mad352

..... ram narian v. state of bombay : air1959sc459 , the supreme court dealt with the validity of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands (amendment) act 1956. this act also fixed a ceiling of agricultural holding, and provided for acquisition of land in excess of if and distribution of the same with a view to ..... be tackled without fixing a ceiling and ceiling necessarily leads to acquisition of the excess over the ceiling area and distribution of the same. the act contains fourteen chapters. chapters i deals with preliminary including definitions, chapter ii with fixation of ceiling on land holdings, chapter iii with ceiling on ..... therefore, merely a subsequent amendment of the constitution removing with retrospective effect the ban or prohibition under article 13(2), but is itself expressly validating the acts and regulations specified in the ninth schedules, notwithstanding the prohibition and declaring that they shall continue in force : air1959sc648 , does not therefore assist the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1985 (HC)

Balasaheb Venkatesh Khasbagh Alias Kulkarni Vs. Land Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3898; 1985(2)KarLJ569

..... power stood transferred to parliament and as a first step towards the eventual imposition of ceiling on immoveable property of every other description. parliament enacted the central act with a view to imposing ceiling on vacant land;, other than land mainly used for the purpose of agriculture, in an urban agglomeration. the argument of ..... assembly on 23-2-1956, the prize competitions act, 1955, central act 42 of 1955 was adopted by the state of mysore. the mysore act 26 of 1957 dealing with the prize competitions control and tax amendment was challenged on the ground that in view of the central act dealing with the prize competitions, the state legislature ..... had surrendered its rights of legislation in favour of the parliament and, therefore, the mysore act was void. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1978 (SC)

Noor Mohd. Khan Ghouse Khan Soudagar Vs. Fakirappa Bharmappa Machenaha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC1217; (1978)3SCC188; [1978]3SCR789

..... s. gorakhram gokalchand [1964] 2 s.c.r. 214 in dealing with the scope of section 28 of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 which gave exclusive jurisdiction to the court of small causes to entertain and try a suit or proceeding between a landlord and a tenant relating to ..... remanded the matter to the trial court for assessment of damages. after remand, by an amendment of the written statement kampanna claimed protection under the karnataka act. the mysore act ceased to be in force in march, 1966. the application for amendment of the written statement was made on the 2nd february, 1973. kampanna contended ..... karnataka revenue appellate tribunal or the state government in exercise of their powers of control.(2) no order of the deputy commissioner, the assistant cocmissioner, the tribunal, the tahsildar, the karnataka revenue appellate tribunal, or the state government made under this act shall be questioned in any civil or criminal court.28. by this section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2008 (SC)

Aslam Mohd. Merchant Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)KLT400; 2008(II)OLR(SC)393; 2008(10)SCALE383; 2008(2)LC855(SC); 2008AIRSCW4868; 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)Crimes122

..... factor but would not necessarily lead to the said conclusion.the act6. the act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to narcotic drugs, to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operation relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, to ..... provide for the forfeiture of property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic in narcotic drug and psychotropic substances, to implement the provisions of the international convention on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and for matters connected therewith.7. chapter va was inserted in the act by act ..... prajivandas and ors. : 1995crilj426 while considering the validity of the provisions of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976, opined:44...the relatives and associates are brought in only for the purpose of ensuring that the illegally acquired properties of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1994 (HC)

Chakiat Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1994]210ITR383(Mad)

..... that the order passed by the court on originating summons is different from the scope of enquiry conducted by the appropriate authority under chapter xx-c of the act and, therefore, merely on the ground that the court has permitted the sale, the appropriate authority cannot be prevented from invoking section 269ud, if circumstances warrant ..... to invoke the provisions of section 269ud(1) of the income-tax act. 11. on the other hand, mr. n. v. balasubramanian, learned counsel appearing for the revenue, submitted that the very fact that the court has granted permission ..... when the court has ordered the sale after inviting offers from the intending purchasers, there is no justification for invoking section 269ud(1) of the income-tax act, which would amount to doubting the action of the court. on that ground, learned counsel wants this court to issue a direction to the appropriate authority not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2012 (HC)

A.K. Balaji Vs. Australia

Court : Chennai

..... there is an india component. to the extent indian law is involved, such matters are addressed by indian lawyers enrolled under the advocates act, 1961. it is stated that the absence of disciplinary control by the bar council of india/state bar council or the supreme court does not qualify as a valid reason, in law, to ..... authorities such as the state bar council, bar council of india, supreme court, etc. these authorities can exercise their disciplinary authority/control only over the advocates who are on the rolls maintained under the advocates act. persons who are not on the rolls would not be subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of these authorities. as such, it ..... is stated that if any person who is not subject to the disciplinary control of the above said authorities is allowed to practice the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 1992 (HC)

Santosh Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Chandra Sah and ors.

Court : Patna

..... aforesaid application was not maintainable in view of the specific provisions contained in section 14 of the bihar buildings (lease, rent & eviction) control act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the act). 2. primary question for determination in the present case is as to what is the remedy available in law to a tenant to ..... tenant from unreasonable eviction, bihar buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1947 was passed and the same was replaced by another act of 1977 and thereafter by the present act which came into force in january, 1983. according to section 11(1) of the act, a tenant is not liable to eviction except in execution of a ..... code or against the intentions of the legislature. this restiction, for the practical purposes, on the exercise of those powers is not because those powers are controlled by the provisions of the code but because it should be presumed, that the procedure specifically provided by the legislature for orders in certain circumstances is dictated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (HC)

H.V. Vijayaraghavan and anr. Vs. Malathi Das and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ375; 2009(4)KCCR2313; 2009(4)AIRKarR385(D.B)

..... supreme court and the environmental clearance/approval given by the ministry of environment and forest (moef) and the karnataka state pollution control board (kspcb). the writ petition lacks merits and bona fides.12.1.2 it is farther averred that as per the ..... : (2007) 5 scc 85, held as under:d. statue law - when statute prescribes a particular manner for doing a particular act, that act must be done in that manner alone.16. ...there is no option left with any one to give up or waive any mode ..... s case.35.1 it is a well-settled law that when a statute prescribes a particular manner for doing a particular act, that act must be done in that manner alone (taylor v. taylor (1876) 1 ch. d. 426).35.2 the above ..... uttarahalli hobli, bangalore south taluk. the lands were converted for non-agricultural residential purposes under the provisions of karnataka land revenue act, 1964. after obtaining necessary approvals, the land was developed and houses have been built. the fourth accused has issued an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //