Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains amendment and validation act 2010 section 11 amendment of section 38 Sorted by: recent Page 8 of about 72 results (0.176 seconds)

Jan 25 2011 (HC)

S.Gnanasekaran Vs. Archeological Survey of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... the parliament has recently introduced a bill in the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains (amendment and validation) bill, 2010 proposing to insert sections 30-a to 30-c providing for punishment for any construction in the protected and regulated area. ..... however, the respondent no.1 in and by their reply dated 11.04.2008 rejected the said request stating that the temporary construction proposed, falls within 100 metres of the protected area of the monument and hence, cannot be considered as being violative of the provisions contained in the ancient monuments and archeological sites and remains act, 1958 (24 of 1958), the rules made under, read with the amending notification dated 16.06.1992 issued by the government of ..... independence, the government of india realising the utmost necessity to protect the ancient monuments has introduced the ancient monuments and archeological sites and remains act, 1958 (24 of 1958). ..... 10.the ancient monuments and archeological sites and remains act, 1958 (24 of 1958):10.1.the act was enacted by the parliament in the year ..... o r d e rlord curzon, architect of the pathbreaking ancient monuments preservation act, 1904, which is the forerunner to the ancient monuments and archeological sites and remains act, 1958 (24 of 1958), while speaking at the annual meeting of the asiatic society of bengal in the year 1900, has observed as follows: "the historic buildings, the magnificent temples, the inestimable works of art, are invested with a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2010 (HC)

(Ayodhya Dispute) Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) and ors. Vs. Zahoor ...

Court : Allahabad

..... of the report of the archeological survey of india massive structure of religious nature is required to be maintained as national monument under the ancient monument archeological site and remains act, 1958. ..... the suit was dismissed for the reasons (i) no valid notice was given, (ii) the plaintiff has no legal character and (iii) the state government can impose reasonable restrictions in public interest to control the crowd and to enable every body to have the darshan of ..... bad for want of valid notice under section 80 cpc?issue no ..... all the three parties are declared to have one third share each, however if while allotting exact portions some minor adjustment in the share is to be made then the same will be made and the adversely affected party may be compensated by allotting some portion of the adjoining land which has been acquired by the central government. ..... that in view of the above both the parties are declared to be joint title holders in possession of the entire premises in dispute and a preliminary decree to that effect is passed with the condition that at the time of actual partition by meets and bounds at the stage of preparation of final decree the portion beneath the central dome where at present make sift temple stands will be allotted to the share of the hindus.order:-accordingly, all ..... & othersversusgopal singh visharad and others the instant suit has been filed for declaration in the year 1961 and thereafter in the year 1995 through amendment relief for possession was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //