Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2007Kant174; 2007CriLJ4443; 2007(6)KarLJ338
ORDERK. Bhakthavatsala, J.1. The petitioner, who is the Chairman and founder President of Infosys, is before this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing the proceedings in P C R No. 7710/2007 (C C No. 12359/2007) on the file of II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, for the offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the National Honour Act'.)2. The petitioner is represented by Sri K.K. Venkugopal, learned Senior Counsel along with Sri K. Shashikiran Shetty. The respondent is represented by Sri C.H. Hanumantharaya, learned Senior Counsel, along with Sri M.K. Vijayakumar.3. The brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the Petition may be stated as under:On 3.5.2007 the respondent/Karnataka Rakshana Vakeelara Vedike (hereinafter referred to as 'the Forum') lodged a private complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P C against the petitioner alleging that on 8.4.2007 in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:01. 11.2018 Pronounced on:16.11.2018 LPA2222017 and CM No.13007/2017 (Stay) THE PRINCIPAL ST MARYS SCHOOL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Romy Chacko and Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocates. RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH & ORS versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal with Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 This appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent Appeal read with Delhi High Court Act and Rules framed there under, impugns Judgment dated 28th November, 2016 passed in W.P (c) No.6780/2015, whereby the learned Single Judge has upheld the order of Delhi School Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as DST), quashing the order of termination of services of Respondent and consequently reinstating him. LPA2222017 Page 1 of 16 Background 2. The brief facts relevant for disposal of the present appeal are that on 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1998Mad283; 1998(1)CTC16; (1998)IMLJ381
ORDER1. In Writ Petition No. 5215 of 1996 the petitioner seeks to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the petitioner's body for the purpose of anatomical dissection, treatment, medical relief, including transplant of vital organ to the deserving donees.2. In Writ Petition No. 5216 of 1996 the writ petitioner seeks to issue a writ of declaration declaring the Tamil Nadu Anatomy Act as ultra vires.3. The facts leading to the filing of both the writ petitions are briefly stated here under:According to the petitioner he is a rationalist and does not believe in any rituals or ceremonies. His father who has the same frame of mind wanted todonate his body after his death to the Institute of Anatomy for the purpose of anatomical dissections. Since, his father's request was not acceded to by the respondents he filed Writ Petition No. 1843 of 1987 and this Court directed the respondents to dissect the body when the same is produced to the mortuary. Likewise one Srinivas...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.08.2010 in W.P.(C) No.8710/2007. 2. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)/the respondent No.2 in the writ petition is the appellant before us. 3. The controversy in issue relates to continuation of the respondent No.2 herein as Principal of the Senior Secondary School run by the respondent No.1 beyond the age of 60 years. 4. As per Rule 110(2) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, the Principal of a recognized private school, whether aided or not, is entitled to hold office until he attains the age of 60 years. Though the respondent No.2 herein attained the age of 60 years on 30.08.2001, the respondent No.1 by resolution dated 11.08.2001 granted extension of 5 years in recognition of her contribution as a founder Principal and vast experience of 29 years of teaching and administration. However, CBSE treated the said extension as an irregularity and on that ground rejected the application of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC500; (1960)62BOMLR371; 1960CriLJ682; [1960]2SCR460
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 73 of 1959. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated January 16/20th, 1959, of the Bombay High Court in Confirmation case No. 25 of 1958 with Criminal Appeal No. 1372 of 1958, arising out of. the judgment and order dated October 27, 1958, of the Sessions Judge, Poona, in Sessions Case No. 52 of 1958. A. S. R. Chtiri, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji and Rameshwar Nath, for the appellant. H. N. Seervai, Advocate-General for the State of Bombay, Porus A. Mehta and R. H. Dhebar, for the respondent. 1959. December 14. The Judgment of S. K. Das and Hidayatullah, JJ., was delivered by Hidayatullah, J. Sarkar, J., delivered a separate Judgment. HIDAYATULLAH J.-This appeal by special leave is against the judgment of the Bombay High Court [J. C. Shah, J. (now of the Supreme Court) and V. S. Desai, J.] by which it maintained the conviction of the appellant, Lagu, under s. 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and confirmed the sentence ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
|Non-Reportable | IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) No.888 OF2015IN CIVIL APPEAL No.1810 OF2009COLLECTOR OF LAND ACQUISITION & ORS. APPELLANTS Vs. M/S ANDAMAN TIMBER INDUSTRIES & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH REVIEW PETITION (C) No.890 OF2015IN I.A. No.7 OF2014IN CIVIL APPEAL No.1810 OF2009AND REVIEW PETITION (C) D. NO.1093 OF2015IN I.A. No.7 OF2014IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.1810 OF2009JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.Review Petition (C) No.888 of 2015: Delay condoned in filing the Review Petition.2. This Review Petition is filed seeking review of the impugned judgment and order dated 28.11.2013 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No.1810 of 2009, whereby the said appeal was dismissed with a direction to the Review Petitioners- Appellants to make and publish an award in respect of the remaining suit land within four months from the date of the impugned judgment and pay compensation to Respondent No.1. herein. I.A. No.7 of 2014 was filed by the Review Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!