Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: airports authority of india act 1994 Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 26 results (0.077 seconds)

May 08 2015 (HC)

State Farm Corporation of India and Anr Vs. Labour Court Sri Ganganag ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... section 3 of the the deposit insurance and credit guarantee corporation act, 1961 (47 of 1961), or the central warehousing corporation established under section 3 of the warehousing corporations act, 1962 (58 of 1962), or the unit trust of india established under section 3 of the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of 1963), or the food corporation of india established under section 3, or a board of management established for two or more contiguous states under section 16, of the food corporations act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or 2[the airports authority of india constituted under section 3 of the airports authority of india act, 1994 (55 of 1994)]. ..... argued that the state government made a reference vide notification dated 10.2.1993 but before making the reference, the state of rajasthan did not consider the fact that the central state farm is a government of india undertaking and a reference in the matter related with central state farm can be made only by the central government being the appropriate government, and as such, the reference itself is without authority of law.6. ..... or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning 8[a dock labour board established under section 5a of the dock workers (regulation of employment) act, 1948 (9 of 1948), or 9[the industrial finance corporation of india limited formed and registered under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956) ]. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2008 (HC)

Promuk Hoffman International Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj216

..... international airport authority of india : (1979)iillj217sc , ..... airport authority of india ..... rules, motor vehicles (new high security registration plates) order, 2001 (in short 'order 2001') purported to be issued in exercise of the powers under sub-section (3) of section 109 of the central motor vehicles act, 1989; the guidelines dated 6.3.2002 and the mandatory requirement of the tender condition 2.19.2 to substantiate their submission stated in the reply that the petitioner company was not found to be technically qualified in evaluation process as ..... the amendments made in the central motor vehicle rules, 1989 by the central motor vehicles (1st amendment) rules, 2001, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 109 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the centered government has framed the motor vehicles (new high security registration plates) order, 2001.18, the tender is in five part-section-i relates to instructions to the bidder, section ii relates to preparation ..... be issued by the licence plate manufacturer or his dealer;(v) the plate shall be fastened with non-removable/nonreusable snap lock fitting system on rear of the vehicle at the premises of the registering authority;the licence plates with all the above specifications and the specified registrations for a vehicle shall be issued by the registering ..... union of india (1994) 6 ..... of india (1994) ..... ramanna dayaram shetty : (1979)iillj217sc , tata cellular (1994) 6 scc 651 and directorate of education and ors. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1999 (HC)

Chander Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj349; 1999(3)WLC563; 1999(1)WLN564

..... airport authority of india ..... petitioner along with the impugned charge-sheet and suspension order, thus he could not file an effective written statement/reply; provisions of section 38 (1) of the rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act, 1994') contemplate a condition precedent that an enquiry under rule 22 (2) can be held only after completing all legal requirements, which include holding a preliminary enquiry by the state ..... as law provides that upon consideration of the report prepared under sub-rule (1) of rule 22 or 'otherwise' the government can form the opinion that the action under section 38 (1) of the act, 1994 was required to be taken, thus, it is the word 'otherwise' on the basis of which the government was also competent to take into consideration any material before it submitted by any person ..... received/secured/procured by it 'otherwise' than report of the preliminary enquiry as contemplated under rule 22( 1), it can consider the same and form the opinion whether action under section 38(1) of the act was warranted and if it forms the opinion to proceed with it, the state government is to take recourse to the procedure provided therein and can also pass the suspension order under sub-section (4) of ..... of rule 336 are limited to the case of disqualification, which falls within the ambit of provisions of section 39 read with section 19of the act, 1994, or it can also be resorted to in the case like the instant.19. ..... panchayati raj act, 1994 38. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1980 (HC)

The Urban Improvement Trust, Jaipur Vs. Padmanand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1980Raj176

..... which squarely fell to be decided in that case was as to whether the international airport authority of india was a governmental agency or not. ..... in other words, the question is for whose benefit was the corporation carrying on the business when it is seen from the provisions of that act that on liquidation of the corporation, its assets should be divided amongst the shareholders, namely, the central and state governments and others, if any, the implication is clear that the benefit of the accumulated income would ..... the chairman of the trust moved an application before the land acquisition officer, under section 18 of the rajasthan land acquisition act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1953') for making a reference to the civil court for the determination of proper amount of compensation and of the persons who were legally entitled to ..... the trust may prepare schemes under section 29 of the 1959 act, on the order of the state government or on its own initiative or on the representation made to it by the ..... then was, in the aforesaid case, was that the urban improvement trust was 'any person interested', within the meaning of section 18 of the act of 1953, and the submission which has been made by dr. ..... in exercise of the powers conferred by section 43 (1) of the 1959 act, the state government issued a notification on july 17, 1961 placing at the disposal of the improvement trust, jaipur all nazul lands lying within the municipal area except those lying within the city walls .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1980 (HC)

Motiyan and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1981Raj284

..... the international airport, authority of india, air 1979 ..... the above, the court further observed that the questions involving consideration of facts which are especially within the knowledge of the authorities concerned, may be raised in other cases and if they do not discharge their duty or special burden imposed under section 106 of the evidence act, without disclosing a sufficientreason for their abstention from disclosure, they have to take the consequences which flow from the non- ..... with due respect to the view taken by the division bench of this court in the above case, i have got no hesitation in holding that the question regarding the urgency under section 17 (14) of the act, is not immune from judicial review and once it is challenged properly, this court has ample jurisdiction to make limited probe into the matter as per limits set out by the supreme court in the above ..... point of any substance which has been pressed before us by the learned counsel for the appellants is that the rules framed under the act had not been complied with in as much as it has been proved that the specimen impression of the seal used had been sent ..... it is true that, although, only 30days from the notification under section 4 (i) are given for the filing of these objections under section 5-a of the act yet, sometimes the proceedings under section 5a are unduly prolonged but, considering the nature of the objections which are capable of being successfully taken under section 5a, it is difficult to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1980 (HC)

Chandra and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1981Raj217

..... international airport authority of india, air 1979 sc 1628, the supreme court has emphasised that article 14 of the constitution strikes at arbitrariness in state action whether it be under authority of law or in exercise of executive power without making of ..... counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the officers of the state government have acted in a very highhanded and arbitrary manner in forcibly taking over the possession of the cinema theatre, which was in possession of the petitioner and that since the aforesaid action of the respondents in taking possession of the cinema theatre is not supported by the authority of any law, the petitioner is entitled to be restored to the possession of the said property of which ..... said dharamshala, temple and the shops and thereupon the petitioners moved a writ petition in the supreme court under article 32 of the constitution wherein it was contended that the order in pursuance of which the acts of dispossession had been committed as well as the acts themselves constituted flagrant infringement by the state and its officials of the fundamental right of the petitioners guaranted under articles 14, 19 and 31 of the constitution. ..... the expiry of the said lease the gram panchayat moved the collector under section 4 of the punjab public premises and land (eviction and land recovery) act, 1959 for the eviction of the appellants on the ground that after the expiry of the lease they were in possession of the demised property unauthorisedly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 1981 (HC)

Jagdish Prasad and anr. Vs. Smt. Maya Wati Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)11

..... international airport authority of india and ors ..... clear that the appellants were not vigilant for their rights, even if they had any, up to 1969 and even thereafter when the collector, had dismissed the application uncer section 285 of the act they did not rush to this court and waited for four years without there being any just excuse for the same.13. ..... not fully conform to the condition laid down in the notice and their lordships while holding that the standard or norm was reasonable and non-discriminatory were pleased to observe that the authority concerned was not entitled to act arbitrarily in accepting the tender. ..... it was also observed that even after petitioner's application under section 285 of the act was rejected, there had been great delay on their part in not availing of any remedy whatsoever for a period of more than ..... filed a writ petition in this court which was dismissed in limine on 9-7-1969 with the observation that the petitioner should first approach the authority under section 285 of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the act). ..... the appellants filed an application under section 285 of the act which was dismissed on 3-2-1970 on the ground that the alleged infirmities were only irregularities which could be waived and the sale has become more than ten ..... grounds of attack the prayer for quashing the order passed by the collector, sirohi on 3-2-1970 dismissing the application under section 285 of the act has been made.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1981 (HC)

Chirag Enterprises Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1981Raj170; 1981()WLN53

..... international airport authority of india (air' 1979 sc 1628) (supra), the matters of judicial review in matters of contracts and tender have assumed new ..... i would have saddled the respondents with costs but the petitioner has also acted in a very selfish manner by not giving the names of officers and parties from which he alleged that purchases have been made almost at double price of the ..... in the matter of purchases of store the state functionaries are required to act with stringent principles mentioned in this manual and safeguard that they are not circumvented by any device or method of avoided on any pretext ..... unlike a private individual, the state cannot act as it pleases in the matter of giving largess and it cannot choose to deal with any person it pleases in its absolute and ..... jammu and kashmir (supra) is that the government cannot act arbitrarily in the matters of contract. ..... government is dealing with the public, whether by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or granting other forms of largess, the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet will. ..... this case should act as ''eye opener'' to all who are trustees of 'public funds' and custodians of 'rule of law' and should result in a 'probe' in the allegation of the ..... made serious grievances that the public functionaries are squandering the public money and are displaying not only dereliction of duties enjoined but betrays confidence upon them to safeguard public money and in acting with a questionable conduct.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1981 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Chirag Enterprises and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj169; 1981()WLN112

..... tender of the 4th respondents who did not have the requisite experience as a second class hostelier for the prescribed length of time and on the facts of that case it was held that the international airport authority of india was not entitled to act arbitrarily in accepting the tender of the 4th respondents, but was bound to conform to the standard or norm laid down in para t of the notice inviting tenders and it was further observed that the first ..... international airport authority of india (air 1979 sc 1628) (supra) tenders were invited from registered second class hoteliers having at least five years' experience for putting up and running a second class restaurant and two snack bars at the airport for a period of three years. ..... international airport authority of india (air 1979 sc 1628) (supra) bhagwati, j. ..... international airport authority of india (air 1979 sc 1628) (supra), justice p.n. ..... international airport authority of india (air 1979 sc 1628) and kasturi lal lakshmi reddy v. ..... respondent, namely, international airport authority-in accepting the tender of the 4th respondents denied equality of opportunity to others similarly situate in the matter of tendering for the contract, as they were precluded from doing so by the condition of eligibility requiring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1981 (HC)

Vallabh Chand Mehta Vs. Rajasthan Co-operative Diary Federation Limite ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)341

..... applying the constellation of criteria collected by us from airport authority : (1979)iillj217sc on a cumulative basis, to the given case, there is enough material to hold that the bharat petroleum corporation is 'state' within the enlarged meaning of article 12.the common sense signification of the expression 'other authorities under the control of the government of india' is plain and there is no reason to make exclusions on sophisticated grounds such as that the legal person must be a statutory corporation, must have power ..... have no relevance to, the issue before us.in that case, on facts it was found that although the regional engineering college, srinagar was run by a society duly registered under, the jammu & kashmir registration of societies act, 1898 still as its control vested in the state government as well as the central government, as it was held that the society is amenable to the jurisdiction of the supreme court under article 32 of the constitution. ..... a division bench of this court has observed that, the making of reference under section 10 of the industrial disputes act is exclusively within the discretion of the government and the respondents can not claim this relief as a matter of right. ..... 1976 wln 708 it may be stated that these cases are distinguishable on facts, had the sangh been simply registered under the co-operative societies act, it could be successfully argued that this by itself is insufficient to hold it to be a state with in the meaning of article 12 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //