Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: airports authority of india act 1994 Court: delhi Page 10 of about 497 results (0.109 seconds)

Uddam Singh JaIn Charitable Trust Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

..... the counsel for the respondent ndmc has also stated that the respondent ndmc has also set up a consumer grievance redressal forum (cgrf) under section 42 of the electricity act, 2003 and the petitioner can approach the said fora for further grievance, if any.10. .....

S. Balachandran Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University and anr

Court : Delhi

..... the respondent no.1 university is directed to place the matter before the appropriate authorities for re-consideration on the said aspect.12. ..... union of india. .....

Shri Narender Gupta Vs. M/S. Reliance Polycrete Ltd.and ors.

Court : Delhi

1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes2. to be referred to the reporter or not? yes3. whether the judgment should be reported yes in digest?1. this is a suit for recovery of rs.46,82,000/-. it is alleged in the plaint that defendant no.1 - reliance polycrete ltd. is an associate of defendant no.5 punjab agro foodgrains corpn. ltd. in terms of an agreement dated 30.6.2005 between them for rendering services for export/domestic sale of indian wheat. defendants 2 to 4 are directors of defendant no.1. it is alleged in the plaint that defendants 1 to 4 induced the plaintiff to part with a sum of rs.2.40 crores for supply of wheat and pursuant thereto the aforesaid amount was deposited by the plaintiff with defendant no.5 in the account of defendant no.1. defendant no.5 issued two orders; one for release of 2500 mt of wheat and the other for release of 1250 mt of wheat, to the plaintiff, in the account of defendant no.1. vide letter dated 23.8.2005, defendant no.5 informed the plaintiff about refund of his money and sought an affidavit from him for release of an amount of rs.20,218,000/- in favour of defendant no.1, to the effect that he shall not claim any financial compensation or wheat stock from defendant no.5. the plaintiff submitted the affidavit accordingly and a cheque of rs.2,02,18,000/- was issued by defendant no.5 in favour of defendant no.1 which released that amount to the plaintiff leaving an outstanding balance of rs.37,82,000/-. .....

Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Delhi

..... the petitioner seeks a direction to the director general, directorate of supplies & disposal (`dgs&d;) (respondent no.2) and the jute commissioner, ministry of textiles, government of india at kolkata (respondent no.4) to issue production control orders (`pcos) to the petitioners jute mill for production and supply of b twill bags to various governmental agencies and departments. ..... the procedure followed was that the various state governments and the foodgrains procuring agencies, including the food corporation of india, utilised the services of the dgs&d; kolkata for purchases of b twill jute bags for packing foodgrains meant for the public distribution system. ..... in the circumstances, this court fails to appreciate how the respondents could be said to have acted arbitrarily in deciding not to issue any further pcos to the petitioner.20. ..... singhania group, incurred heavy losses and on 24th october 1994 filed a reference with the board for industrial & financial reconstruction. ..... after pointing out that the pcos were of a statutory nature and that failure to honour a pco would be an offence under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955 the respondent no. .....

Ramanand Amit Vs. Ruhi Ramanand

Court : Delhi

..... praying inter alia for setting aside/quashing of the order dated 5.4.2010 passed by the learned asj, disposing of his appeal filed under section 29 of the protection of woman from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short 'the act'), against the ex parte judgment and order dated 13.4.2009, passed by the learned metropolitan magistrate, mahila court, delhi.2. ..... it is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that insofar as the petition filed by the respondent under section 12 of the act is concerned, the petitioner has filed his reply thereto and the matter is now listed before the trial court in february 2011 for completion of pleadings and for further proceedings. ..... the present petition is filed by the petitioner under article 227 of the constitution of india read with section 482 cr.p.c. ..... asj directed that as interim relief, the appellant would continue to pay to the respondent, a sum of `3,000/- as maintenance and `2,500/- as rent from april 2008 onwards till the petition filed by her under section 12 of the act is decided on merits. ..... , it is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the respondent is not the wife of the petitioner and he was not in a relationship with her in the nature of marriage and hence, she is not entitled to invoke the act. ..... court that the respondent would be entitled to interim maintenance from the date of the complaint itself and the petitioner would be liable to pay arrears, if any, on the final disposal of the petition under section 12 of the act.4. .....

Smt. Vimal Kanta Vs. Shri J.M. Kohli

Court : Delhi

..... narendra singh,: [1972]2scr657 , while considering the case of judicial separation on the ground of desertion under section 10(1)(a) of the act read with the explanation, held:"...the two elements present on the side of the deserted spouse should be absence of consent and absence of conduct reasonably causing the deserting spouse to form his or her intention to ..... contention raised by the counsel for the appellant was that once the respondent husband has failed to prove the acts of cruelty on the part of the appellant wife, then the respondent leaving the matrimonial home due to the cruel acts of the appellant wife could not have arisen. ..... "desertion", for the purpose of seeking divorce under the act, means the intentional permanent forsaking and abandonment of one spouse by the other without that other's consent and without ..... of 80 years is before this court in appeal to challenge the judgment and decree of divorce passed by the learned trial court vide order dated 30.9.94 on the ground of desertion envisaged under section 13 (1)(ib) of the hindu marriage act, 1955, thereby dissolving the marriage between the parties.2. ..... mota, this court had occasion to consider the true meaning the ambit of section 10(1)(a) of the act read with the explanation. ..... the animus for bringing the cohabitation to end was later developed and can be inferred from the subsequent events in the present case as the appellant made no efforts for reconciliation or did any act to restore the wrecked relationship. .....

Malkhan Singh Vs. Union of IndiA.

Court : Delhi

..... by clauses (a) to (d) of rule 31 can be levied except after an inquiry is held, which as per sub-rule (2) of rule 34 has to be pursuant to definite charges communicated in writing to the member of the force by the disciplinary authority and as per the explanation to sub-rule (2) of rule 34, for the purposes of sub-rule (2) as also sub-rule (3) the disciplinary authority includes the authority competent to impose penalties specified under clause (e) to (h) of rule 31 and thus it is apparent that the rules contemplate a disciplinary ..... the aforesaid medical store but the same was not considered on the ground that the petitioner submitted bills, prescription slips, there was no reference of the dates in the opd register.the appellate authority was of the view that there was no need of handwriting expert opinion with regard to the verification of doctor's signatures. ..... the petitioner preferred an appeal against the final order dated 16.12.1992 which was dismissed by the appellate authority vide order dated 23.04.1993 which reads as under:- (i) petitioner while working in cisf unit zawar mines hindustan zinc limited , udaipur got treated himself and his family members ..... commandant could not issue the charge sheet as he was not the disciplinary authority and that it was only the commandant who could act as the disciplinary authority. ..... the appellate authority has considered enquiry report that the most of the bills were issued by raj ayurvedic medical store who is famous for such acts. .....

Shri Pal Singh Vs. Shri Dharshan Singh

Court : Delhi

..... partition deed requires compulsory registration yet if one such party to the settlement had altered his/her share position by acting upon that compromise and under that compromise obtained a substantial benefit, he/she is bound by it and cannot ask the other ..... records that the parties had mutually submitted a partition scheme dated 14.4.1970 which had been rejected by the settlement officer; since the revenue authority had been enabled to carry out the mutation the appeal was dismissed.13. ..... judgment, the plea raised was that the assets of the partnership firm should have been dealt with under section 48 of the indian partnership act, 1932 and the proceeds be disbursed to the partners in accordance with their respective shares. ..... legal submission being that the provisions of section 17 and 49 of the registration act would bar the reading in evidence of such a document in the absence of ..... these proceedings clearly show that the parties had in fact acted upon this settlement dated 14.4.1970; they had treated this agreement as the basis and foundation of their intention to claim sanad/transfer of the property in the aforenoted ratios before the managing officer ..... case the plea of the appellant/defendant before the courts below was that the partition deed was never acted upon; specific issue to this effect had also been framed. ..... requires a compulsory registration under section 17 and 49 of the indian registration act, 1908; in the absence of which this document cannot be lead in evidence .....

Major Man Mohan Singh Battu Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the then commanding officer 2 mahar regiment in the sale of regimentaccessories namely kamarbunds, spads and belts purchased out ofmoney, pooled from personnel of theunit, at prices higher than their cost price.fourth an act prejudicial to good order charge and military disciplinearmy actsection 63 in that he, at-field, on 26 may 83 when in second- in-command of 2 mahar regiment,improperly caused an entry in unitcolumnar cash account book of`9000/- (rupees nine ..... lt col daljit singh kohli (now maj) the then commandingofficer 2 mahar regiment in stocking of unauthorized goods for sale in unit canteen contrary to army order355/71 which forbade stocking of non csd stores in canteens.third an act prejudicial to good order charge and military discipline, army actsection 63 in that he, at field, on 20 jul 83, when second-in- command 2 mahar regiment, improperly aided ic-167 43m lt coldaljit singh kohli (now maj) ..... the submission that the statutory representation has been disposed of by a non-speaking order is neither here nor there for the reason when an authority concurs with the findings of the lower authority no reasons have to be given and as long as there is material to show application of mind, it would be sufficient compliance with not only the letter but even the ..... it is apparent that the authorities took cognizance of the limited role played by the petitioner as also that he was the second-in-command and that the main perpetrator was the commandant of the unit and .....

Charanjit Singh, Gaba Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996CriLJ205

..... yet another matter one of the contentions which had been urged by the detenu before the supreme court was that he had addressed a joint representation to the detaining authority, the central government and the advisory board and the same was submitted through the superintendent, bombay central prison, and that the said representation was rejected by the central ..... case here and, as noted above, for, one, he was not told of his constitutional right to make a representation against the declaration to the declaring authority, and, two, the affidavit in reply of the first respondent does not show if the declaring authority itself independently considered the representation against the declaration though not addressed to it but addressed to the central government. ..... the fact that the petitioner had not been informed of his right to make a representation to the declaring authority yet he makes such a representation and the declaring authority considers the same independently, the petitioner may not be able to complain about the violation of his constitutional ..... sankaran, additional secretary to the government of india, issued a declaration dated 30 august, 1994 under section 9(1) of the act on his satisfaction that the detenu was likely to engage in smuggling goods ..... , arrived at the indira gandhi international airport on 30 june, 1994 by kuwait airway flight from dubai. ..... airport, new delhi, which was an area highly vulnerable to smuggling as defined in explanationn i to section 9(1) of the act .....