Court : Karnataka
..... the plaintiffs for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction is not maintainable and hence, sought to dismiss the same. iv additional written statement by the defendant9 after amendment of the plaint, the defendant filed additional written statement and contended that all the church properties belong to the arch-diocese of bangalore where the arch- bishop of ..... prayer of the plaint nor in the cause title or there is any averment. he would further contend that in ex.p.27 the rtc for the year 2007-08, column no.9 shows the name of the khatedaar and possession as 20 the school master and use of the land as building . ex.p.11 ..... (dead) through legal representatives reported in (2017) 2 scc415 head note b, paragraphs 17-19; xiii) vidhyadhar vs. mankikrao and another reported in air1999sc1441 section 100 of the evidence act; xiv) ravinder kaur grewal and ors. vs. manjit kaur and ors. radhakrishna reddy (d) through lrs. v. g. ayyavoo and ors. reported in air2019sc382719. sri r. ravi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... a person in the process of taking any steps to establish any industry, operation or process immediately before the commencement of the water (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1988, for which no consent was necessary prior to such commencement, may continue to do so for a period of three months from such commencement or, if ..... that a person operating any industrial plant in any air pollution control area immediately before the commencement of section 9 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1987 (47 of 1987), for which no consent was necessary prior to such commencement, may continue to do so for a period of three months from such ..... - 24 - some members of the petitioner had filed a writ petition in the year 2003 for the same relief which was dismissed by order dated 27th june, 2007. it is, therefore, contended that the petitioner has not come to the court with clean hands. the state government also filed the statement of objections dealing with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... a person in the process of taking any steps to establish any industry, operation or process immediately before the commencement of the water (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1988, for which no consent was necessary prior to such commencement, may continue to do so for a period of three months from such commencement or, if ..... that a person operating any industrial plant in any air pollution control area immediately before the commencement of section 9 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) amendment act, 1987 (47 of 1987), for which no consent was necessary prior to such commencement, may continue to do so for a period of three months from such ..... - 24 - some members of the petitioner had filed a writ petition in the year 2003 for the same relief which was dismissed by order dated 27th june, 2007. it is, therefore, contended that the petitioner has not come to the court with clean hands. the state government also filed the statement of objections dealing with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pppac) under the department of economic affairs, ministry of finance, government of india. the statutory provisions as contained under the aircraft act, 1934 and aircraft rules, 1937 read with airports authority of india act, 1994 as amended from time to time empowers the government to lease the premises of any airport to carry out some of its function in ..... that civil aviation is a subject in the central list under the constitution of india and the subject falls within the legislative competence of the parliament. the aircraft act, 1934 and the rules framed thereunder governs the development, maintenance and operation of all airports and it is the central government which has the sole right ..... state of m.p. v. narmada bachao andolan (2011) 7 scc639iii) k.d.sharma v. sail (2008) 12 scc481iv) arunima baruah v. union of india (2007) 6 scc120in light of the aforesaid judgments, the petition deserves to be dismissed. 4627. the kerala high court has dealt in detail the issue of leasing out of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... .e.f.12.01.2015. the said provision comprised of section 10a(1) and 10a(2) (a) to 10a(2)(c). by amendment act no.16 of 2021, the provision was amended 39 (1996) 2 scc43940 (2007) 11 scc4041 (2009) 15 scc705- 35 - by incorporating two provisos to section 10a(2)(b) as well as an additional clause as section 10a(2)(d) w ..... record in w.p.no.1920/2021 are that the petitioner had been granted a prospecting licence and had applied for grant of mining lease in 2007 prior to 12.01.2015 when the amendment to mmdr act took effect by incorporation of section 10a(2)(b); subsequently, after following the prescribed procedure, the state government was satisfied that the petitioner s application .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... .e.f.12.01.2015. the said provision comprised of section 10a(1) and 10a(2) (a) to 10a(2)(c). by amendment act no.16 of 2021, the provision was amended 39 (1996) 2 scc43940 (2007) 11 scc4041 (2009) 15 scc705- 35 - by incorporating two provisos to section 10a(2)(b) as well as an additional clause as section 10a(2)(d) w ..... record in w.p.no.1920/2021 are that the petitioner had been granted a prospecting licence and had applied for grant of mining lease in 2007 prior to 12.01.2015 when the amendment to mmdr act took effect by incorporation of section 10a(2)(b); subsequently, after following the prescribed procedure, the state government was satisfied that the petitioner s application .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... .e.f.12.01.2015. the said provision comprised of section 10a(1) and 10a(2) (a) to 10a(2)(c). by amendment act no.16 of 2021, the provision was amended 39 (1996) 2 scc43940 (2007) 11 scc4041 (2009) 15 scc705- 35 - by incorporating two provisos to section 10a(2)(b) as well as an additional clause as section 10a(2)(d) w ..... record in w.p.no.1920/2021 are that the petitioner had been granted a prospecting licence and had applied for grant of mining lease in 2007 prior to 12.01.2015 when the amendment to mmdr act took effect by incorporation of section 10a(2)(b); subsequently, after following the prescribed procedure, the state government was satisfied that the petitioner s application .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... .e.f.12.01.2015. the said provision comprised of section 10a(1) and 10a(2) (a) to 10a(2)(c). by amendment act no.16 of 2021, the provision was amended 39 (1996) 2 scc43940 (2007) 11 scc4041 (2009) 15 scc705- 35 - by incorporating two provisos to section 10a(2)(b) as well as an additional clause as section 10a(2)(d) w ..... record in w.p.no.1920/2021 are that the petitioner had been granted a prospecting licence and had applied for grant of mining lease in 2007 prior to 12.01.2015 when the amendment to mmdr act took effect by incorporation of section 10a(2)(b); subsequently, after following the prescribed procedure, the state government was satisfied that the petitioner s application .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of 1984), shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or (ii) published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984 (68 of 1984), shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification:]. - 41 - wp no.11551 of 2019 ..... ) 1 scc1 by relying upon the decision in union of india v. jaiswal coal co. ltd., reported in (1999) 5 scc733and cbi v. ashok kumar aggarwal reported in (2007) 10 scc736 he submits that if this court were to entertain the above writ petition, the same would be contrary to the orders passed by the hon ble apex court ..... hobli, anekal taluk. the 1st petitioner and 2nd petitioner jointly owned sy. no.143 measuring 5 acres. 2nd petitioner has executed the general power of attorney dated 23.08.2007 in favour of 1st petitioner for challenging this acquisition by him. the 2nd petitioner is the mother of 1st petitioner, however, on the basis of the power of attorney .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of 1984), shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or (ii) published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984 (68 of 1984), shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification:]. - 41 - wp no.11551 of 2019 ..... ) 1 scc1 by relying upon the decision in union of india v. jaiswal coal co. ltd., reported in (1999) 5 scc733and cbi v. ashok kumar aggarwal reported in (2007) 10 scc736 he submits that if this court were to entertain the above writ petition, the same would be contrary to the orders passed by the hon ble apex court ..... hobli, anekal taluk. the 1st petitioner and 2nd petitioner jointly owned sy. no.143 measuring 5 acres. 2nd petitioner has executed the general power of attorney dated 23.08.2007 in favour of 1st petitioner for challenging this acquisition by him. the 2nd petitioner is the mother of 1st petitioner, however, on the basis of the power of attorney .....
Tag this Judgment!