Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... is deleted. the joint committee of parliament discussed these recommendations and only thought it proper to make certain modifications in the section. that led to amendment of section 115 by the old amendment act. the deliberations of the committee are reflected in the following words; "the committee, however, feel that, in addition to the restrictions contained in section ..... of the suit or other proceedings. 13 15 the apex court in the case shiva shakti (supra) dealing with maintainability of revision petition after the amendment to section 115 under act 46 of 1999 with effect from 01.07.2002 has held that a question needs to be asked if whether the order in favour of the ..... then the application was maintainable and otherwise not. the apex court while comparing with the provision of section 115 of cpc prior to and subsequent to the amendment, at para no.12 had taken note of the recommendation of law commission of india which is extracted hereunder;"12. it is interesting to note that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... is adequate or substantial compliance with section 42 or not is a question of fact to be decided in each case. the above position got strengthened with the amendment to section 42 by act 9 of 2001.39. this high court in the case of subramanyam (supra) in paragraphs-6, 7 and 21 has observed thus:"6. point no.1: ..... is adequate or substantial compliance with section 42 or not is a question of fact to be decided in each case. the above position got strengthened with the amendment to section 42 by act 9 of 2001." 44 crl.a.200021/2017 even, admittedly, shrikant mishra had no authority to make search. nothing has been brought on record to show ..... judgment and order of conviction and sentence contended that the trial court has rightly convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the ndps act and the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence does not suffer from any irregularity or illegality, which calls for interference at the hands of this court. he .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... and insurance companies etc. section 145 of the m.v.act gives the definitions. clause (g) only stipulates the "third party" includes the government (before amendment act 2019). section 146 of the m.vact deals with necessity for insurance against third party risk. section 147 of the m.v.act stipulates regarding requirements of policies and limits of liability. therefore, ..... 5928. the hon'ble apex court in the case of oriental insurance company v. meena variyal and others [(2007) 5 scc428 were pleased to observe at paragraphs 12, 13, 14, which are as follows:-"12. chapter xi of the act bears a heading, "insurance of motor vehicles against third party risks". the definition of "third party" is an ..... order dated 17.08.2016, notice to r-2 is held sufficient) this mfa is filed under section 173(1) of mv act against the judgment and award dated 20.07.2010 passed in mvc no.170/2007 on the file of the court of civil judge (sr. dn.) and addl. mact at basavakalyan partly allowing the claim petition .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... incurred is unlimited. the cover of insurance is against any liability, which the insured may incur in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person. by amendment act 54/1994 which came into effect from 14-11-1994 the injury to any person includes the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicles. ..... applicable. therefore, it is the contention of the appellant/ insurance company to exonerate the appellant/ insurance company.9. section 147(1)(b)(i) of the m.v.act is amended by inserting the clauses that "injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle" by substituting the word as "injury ..... which amendment is made by the act 54 of 1994 with effect from 14.11.1994. the division bench of this court in smt.sumitrabai's case (mfa no.6624/2007) this second provision is not discussed. therefore, the 31 above cited judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand.19. section 2(14) of the m.v.act, defines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... incurred is unlimited. the cover of insurance is against any liability, which the insured may incur in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person. by amendment act 54/1994 which came into effect from 14-11-1994 the injury to any person includes the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicles. ..... applicable. therefore, it is the contention of the appellant/ insurance company to exonerate the appellant/ insurance company.9. section 147(1)(b)(i) of the m.v.act is amended by inserting the clauses that "injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle" by substituting the word as "injury ..... which amendment is made by the act 54 of 1994 with effect from 14.11.1994. the division bench of this court in smt.sumitrabai's case (mfa no.6624/2007) this second provision is not discussed. therefore, the 31 above cited judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand.19. section 2(14) of the m.v.act, defines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... incurred is unlimited. the cover of insurance is against any liability, which the insured may incur in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person. by amendment act 54/1994 which came into effect from 14-11-1994 the injury to any person includes the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicles. ..... applicable. therefore, it is the contention of the appellant/ insurance company to exonerate the appellant/ insurance company.9. section 147(1)(b)(i) of the m.v.act is amended by inserting the clauses that "injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle" by substituting the word as "injury ..... which amendment is made by the act 54 of 1994 with effect from 14.11.1994. the division bench of this court in smt.sumitrabai's case (mfa no.6624/2007) this second provision is not discussed. therefore, the 31 above cited judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand.19. section 2(14) of the m.v.act, defines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... incurred is unlimited. the cover of insurance is against any liability, which the insured may incur in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person. by amendment act 54/1994 which came into effect from 14-11-1994 the injury to any person includes the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicles. ..... applicable. therefore, it is the contention of the appellant/ insurance company to exonerate the appellant/ insurance company.9. section 147(1)(b)(i) of the m.v.act is amended by inserting the clauses that "injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle" by substituting the word as "injury ..... which amendment is made by the act 54 of 1994 with effect from 14.11.1994. the division bench of this court in smt.sumitrabai's case (mfa no.6624/2007) this second provision is not discussed. therefore, the 31 above cited judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand.19. section 2(14) of the m.v.act, defines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... incurred is unlimited. the cover of insurance is against any liability, which the insured may incur in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person. by amendment act 54/1994 which came into effect from 14-11-1994 the injury to any person includes the owner of the goods or his authorized representative carried in the vehicles. ..... applicable. therefore, it is the contention of the appellant/ insurance company to exonerate the appellant/ insurance company.9. section 147(1)(b)(i) of the m.v.act is amended by inserting the clauses that "injury to any person including owner of the goods or his authorised representative carried in the vehicle" by substituting the word as "injury ..... which amendment is made by the act 54 of 1994 with effect from 14.11.1994. the division bench of this court in smt.sumitrabai's case (mfa no.6624/2007) this second provision is not discussed. therefore, the 31 above cited judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand.19. section 2(14) of the m.v.act, defines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... act, the words or by any provision of transfer of property act, 1882 has made it clear that the document of which ..... the case of sale. therefore, in case of immovable property, section 54 of transfer of property act, 1882 as to the registration or delivery of possession apply. 3125. in view of amendment to section 49 of the registration act, 1908 brought about by an amending act no.21 of 1929, which by inserting in section 49 of the registration ..... in the high court of karnataka r kalaburagi bench dated this the22d day of october, 2020 before the hon ble mr.justice p.n.desai regular second appeal no.868/2007 between: smt. ismailbee w/o. mohd. khaja saheb aged60years, occ: household, r/o. hirapur, tq. & dist. gulbarga -585 103 . appellant (by sri ameet kumar deshpande., .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... co-operative society had already been held in accordance with the bye laws of such society, prior to the commencement of the karnataka co-operative societies (amendment) act 1997, the term of office of the board of such co-operative society shall be three years including the co-operative year in which such election was ..... co- operative societies in force in a state immediately before the commencement of the constitution (ninety-seventh amendment) act, 2011, which is inconsistent with the provisions of this part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed by a competent legislature or other competent authority or until the expiration of one year from ..... members in respect of sugar co-operative societies is extended while the same benefit is not extended, is an act seeking the extension of negative equality. in vishal properties (p) ltd. vs. state of uttar pradesh reported 2007 (11) scc172and in bondu ramswamy 140 vs. bangalore development authority and others reported in 2010 (7) .....
Tag this Judgment!