Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 3 of about 13,231 results (0.180 seconds)

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... height clearance is erroneous and contrary to the material on record. he would further contend that the provisions of section 9-a of the aircrafts act, 1934 provides height of the building around airports and the central government is empowered to issue notification, if necessary and expedient so to do for the ..... issued by the ministry of civil aviation, government of india, in exercise of powers conferred under the provisions of section 9a of the aircraft act, 1934, to regulate construction for the safety of aircraft operations. prior to the said notification, similar notification relating to hal were 14 issued by the airports authority of india ( aai for ..... 13. it is further contended by the 1st respondent that the provisions of the aircraft act, 1934 (for short, the act ) has been enacted to make provisions for the control of the manufacture, possession, use, operation, sale, import and export of aircrafts and in furtherance of the said object, section 9-a empowers the central government .....

Airports Authroity Employees Union Regd No 3515 Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... pppac) under the department of economic affairs, ministry of finance, government of india. the statutory provisions as contained under the aircraft act, 1934 and aircraft rules, 1937 read with airports authority of india act, 1994 as amended from time to time empowers the government to lease the premises of any airport to carry out some of its function in ..... that civil aviation is a subject in the central list under the constitution of india and the subject falls within the legislative competence of the parliament. the aircraft act, 1934 and the rules framed thereunder governs the development, maintenance and operation of all airports and it is the central government which has the sole right ..... state of m.p. v. narmada bachao andolan (2011) 7 scc639iii) k.d.sharma v. sail (2008) 12 scc481iv) arunima baruah v. union of india (2007) 6 scc120in light of the aforesaid judgments, the petition deserves to be dismissed. 4627. the kerala high court has dealt in detail the issue of leasing out of the .....

T. Nagappa Vs. T.C. Basappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant102; AIR1954Mys102

..... out of time. the election tribunal has not been shown to have the power to extend the period of limitation and must therefore be held to have acted without jurisdiction when, by amending the petition, it enlarged the period prescribed for the presentation of the election petition.16. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the election tribunal ..... election tribunal. it would, if that was the intention, have referred to and embodied order 6, rule 17, civil p. c. in the representation of the people act. the amendment by the election tribunal of the election petition sent to it by the election commission must therefore be held to be an ..... the code of civil procedure as such and in toto are not made applicable to the proceedings before election tribunals and that the election tribunal acted without jurisdiction in invoking the provisions of order 6, rule 17, to amend the petition sent to it by the election commission.a perusal of the provisions of the representation of the people .....

Hutcha Thimmegowda and anr. Vs. Dyavamma and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant93; AIR1954Mys93; ILR1954KAR70; (1954)32MysLJ33

..... now stated by mukherjea j. after the british left, that area is now ceded to mysore. the mysore high court has now jurisdiction over coorg under the mysore high court amendment act and in coorg which was a chief commissioner's province before the constitution, the law, as laid down by the privy council, was of course the prevailing law. recently ..... to make a reference to it in -- 'narayana rao v. karibasappa' air 1951 mys 126 (pl), while dealing with a case of the application of s. 53a, t. p. act relating to the doctrine of 'part performance'.in -- : [1952]1scr544 (a)' their lordships sayid fazl ali, mukherjee and vivian bose jj. held that a son is liable even after ..... joined his sons in attacking the sales and claiming shares in the properties. the claim of the mothers and daughters rests on the provisions of hindu law women's rights act (no. 10 of 1933) and that of the sons of the law of mitakshara. adopting the considerations applied hitherto in such cases the learned sub-judge held that .....

Abdul Shakoor and anr. Vs. Custodian of Evacuee Property in Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant152; AIR1954Mys152

..... apparently therefore and for reasons which are not clear or explained, acted under any provision of that act but has purported to act expressly under section 27 of act 31 of 1950. until by act 66 of 1950, section 58, clauses (2) and (3) were amended the case could not be brought under act 31 of 1950 or the powers of revision provided in it ..... implication.'in that case the question arose whether the appellant's appeal was governed by the central provinces and berar sales tax act when the assessment proceedings were started or by a later amended proviso to section 22 (1) of the act. the board of revenue had taken the view that as the order of assessment was made after the ..... amendment of the section and the appeal was filed thereafter, such appeal must be governed by the provisions of law as it existed at .....

J. Kishenlal Phoolchand Vs. A. Rathan Singh

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant162; AIR1954Mys162

..... on the point. the full bench considered advisable that, in order to set the doubt at rest so far as their courts were concerned, the rule should be so amended as not to leave any doubt as to the true interpretation of clause (ii) of rule 1 of order 40. they themselves left the question open as they felt ..... it is not clear how the learned district judge considers that a creditor advances only 40 per cent, of the value of the property. section 66, transfer of property act, provides that a security is sufficient only if--in the case of mortgaged buildings--they are at least twice the value of the debt. it cannot be believed that the ..... mortgage in favour of ambaram fakirbhai.3. in the counter affidavit the defendant pleaded that the plaintiff was aware about the encumbrances and that one khanmull ganeshmull who was acting for the plaintiff had applied or promised to apply for an encumbrance certificate and had collected the necessary charges from himself. the suit mortgage deed was got drawn up .....

Mohamed Khasim Vs. State of Mysore by Sales Officer, No. 7th Sub Circl ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant41; AIR1955Mys41; (1956)34MysLJ193

..... be liable to tax. following the same train of reasoning building contract cannot also be considered indivisible any more than a contract to produce a book. the amending act takes note of the moveable properties utilised in the works contract and includes the material used for construction of immoveable property in the definition of goods. the ..... and that the supply of material by the employee or the contractor does not involve any element of sale.in that view the learned judges concluded that the amendment introduced in 1947 containing a definition of 'works contract' including an extension of the concept of sale of goods was ultra vires the provincial legislature. it ..... neither be confined nor limited to the meaning of that expression, as understood in the sale of goods act. the mysore sales-tax act of 1948 incorporates the amendments of 1947 in the madras act. it is not necessary to labour this point further as the petitioner has not raised these grounds in any of the petitions under .....

Mohamed Khasim Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1955CriLJ524; ILR1954KAR460; [1955]6STC211(Kar)

..... be liable to tax. following the same train of reasoning building contract cannot also be considered indivisible any more than a contract to produce a book. the amending act takes note of the movable properties utilised in the works contract and includes the material used for construction of immovable property in the definition of goods. the ..... the supply of material by the employee or the contractor does not involve any element of sale. 9. in that view the learned judges concluded that the amendment introduced in 1947 containing a definition of 'works contract' including an extension of the concept of sale of goods was ultra vires the provincial legislature. it ..... neither be confined nor limited to the meaning of that expression as understood in the sale of goods act. the mysore sales tax act of 1948 incorporates the amendments of 1947 in the madras act. it is not necessary to labour this point further as the petitioner has not raised these grounds in any of the petitions under consideration .....

H.R. Patel Vs. C.G. Venkatalakshamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant65; AIR1955Mys65

..... bench shall be the decision of the chief court.' the code of civil procedure act v of 1908 was extended to mysore with effect from 1-4-1951 by the code of civil procedure amendment act ii of 1951. section 20 of the latter act provided that if immediately before the date on which the said code came into force ..... the maharaja of mysore. it contains provisions mostly analogous or similar to those in the letters patent of other high courts and the government of india act 1935 sections. (sic). that act was amended from time to time and when the state of mysore merged with the territory of india and became subject to the constitution section 15(3) ..... powers which may be exercised by a court. he has referred to some local and special acts such as section 13, aircraft act, 1934, section 24, arms act, 1878, section 10, central excises and salt act, 1944, section 13, food adulteration act, 1919 and the various acts relating to money-lenders and money-lending in which power has been given to courts to .....

D.B. Godse and anr. Vs. K.S. Ramachandra Iyer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant107; AIR1955Mys107

..... it is strange that the learned district judge has not referred to this point in the course of his order. from a perusal of the amended section 2 of the mysore house rent and accommodation control (amendment) act, 1954, it is seen that 'member of his family' appearing in c'. 6(a) when used with reference to a landlord means ..... the respondent from the schedule premises. the learned first addl. district judge reversed this order of the learned munsiff holding that the respondent was not guilty of such act or conduct as amounted to annoyance or nuisance to the petitioners. as against that order this revision petition is filed.6. it appears to me that the order ..... in the downstairs and the petitioners are in occupation of the upstairs. the petitioners applied under section 8(2)(vi) of the mysore house rent and accommodation control act, 1951 to the first munsiff and house rent and accommodation controller for eviction of the respondent on the ground that the space in the upstairs was not sufficient .....