Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Page 2 of about 185,737 results (0.741 seconds)

May 20 1993 (TRI)

Vippy Salvex Products Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Reported in : (1993)46TTJIndore635

..... therefore, decided to reintroduce the investment allowance at least for some period. with that purpose in view, sub-s. (8b) of s. 32a was inserted by the direct laws (amendment) act, 1989 w.e.f. 1st april, 1989. it reads as under : "(8b). notwithstanding anything contained in sub-s. (8) or the notification of the government of india ..... allowance in respect of certain specified ship or aircraft or machinery or plant. the rate of investment allowance at 25% was also reduced to 20% in respect of those specified assets and for that purpose first proviso was inserted in s. 32a(1) of the act by the same direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1989, w.e.f. 1st april, ..... provision contained in s.32a(8) that the withdrawal of investment allowance would not be earlier than three years from the date of notification making the withdrawal, was amended by the finance act, 1986 w.e.f. 1st april, 1986 and thereby the condition of three years prior notice was withdrawn. soon thereafter a notification no. gsr 870(e .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 1962 (FN)

Chandler and Others Vs. Director of Public Prosecutions

Court : House of Lords

..... bill through its various stages amendments to it or other reasons may make it desirable to alter a side note. in that event i have reason to believe that alteration is made by the appropriate ..... view side notes cannot be used as an aid to construction. they are mere catchwords and i have never heard of it being supposed in recent times that an amendment to alter a side note could be proposed in either house of parliament. side notes in the original bill are inserted by the draftsman. during the passage of the ..... correct method of ascertaining whether a purpose is prejudicial or not is to consider the purposed act as if it had been done would that act, the obstruction of the aircraft, be prejudicial to the state? to answer that enquiry all the consequences of the act that are reasonably to be apprehended must be assessed and the whole assessment is for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2019 (HC)

Dr S J Rajalakshmi Vs. The Manager

Court : Karnataka

..... inspection; (g) the licensing of persons employed in the operation, manufacture, repair or maintenance of aircraft; [(ga) the licensing of persons engaged in air traffic control; the (gb) certification, inspection and regulation of communication, navigation and surveillance or air traffic management facilities; the aircraft (amendment) act, 2007 (44 of 2007) came into force with effect from 01-02-2008 vide notification no.av.11012/3/2000 ..... -a dated 21st january 2008 (gc) the measures to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference;]. (h) the air-routes by which and, the conditions under which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1992 (HC)

Ever Bright Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1993(65)ELT196(Cal)

..... the import is made by a vessel or aircraft. thus the said two provisos deal with two completely different situations.8. it has further been contended that prior to the amendments made by the customs, central excises & salt and central boards of revenue (amendment) act, 1978 (in short the amendment act), there was no existence of the second ..... been drawn between goods imported by a vehicle and goods imported by a ship or aircraft. the words 'such manifest or report' in the first proviso deleted and were replaced by the words 'such reports'. simultaneously and by the same amendment act, the second proviso was added. if the contention of the respondent is accepted then ..... the said amendments made with effect from 1-7-1978 would become meaningless and redundant. there would have been no need to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1994 (HC)

Spares Corporation Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1995]97STC645(AP)

..... aviation spirit out of the territory of india. therefore, such sales would not fall within the explanation (explanation to clause (1) is since omitted by constitution (sixth amendment) act, 1956) to sub-clause (a) of the first clause of article 286 of the constitution of india and as such the turnover was not liable to sales tax. ..... the following terms : '........... here, the buyer does not export the goods to a foreign country, but purchases them for his own use on the journey of the aircraft to foreign countries. this difference is vital, and makes the position of the appellant-companies, if anything, weaker. it is for this reason that the appellant-companies depend ..... and were carrying on business at calcutta. they maintained supply depots at dum dum airport from which aviation spirit was sold and delivered to aircraft proceeding abroad for its consumption. the question was whether the sale of the aviation spirit was liable to sales tax under the bengal motor spirit sales taxation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2009 (HC)

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

..... to export duty at the rate of rs. 300 per ton. after the entry no. 11 in the second schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975 was amended with effect from 1-3-2007, the are-l's bills of export for supply of iron ore pellets by the petitioner to the sez unit continued to be assessed ..... the sea customs act, at the time of enactment of the customs act, 1962, it was proposed to consolidate the provisions relating to sea customs, land customs and air customs into ..... year 1924 which was also not a self-contained act and applied by reference, provisions of the sea customs act to land customs with certain modifications. there was no separate law relating to air customs, and the administration of air customs was governed by certain rules made under the indian aircrafts act, 1911. therefore, while revising the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2003 (HC)

Narang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2004]135STC289(Bom)

..... originally contained the explanation, the reproduction of which is not necessary at this stage.66. the original explanation to article 286(1) was deleted by the constitution (sixth amendment) act after the judgment in the bengal immunity co. ltd. v. state of bihar : [1955]2scr603 , and sub-articles (2) and (3) were inserted permitting the ..... unit to be parked inside the international airport after completing customs, quarantine and other legal formalities and keep ready for being delivered to a foreign going aircraft. the final requirement of the quantity is notified to the supply unit just a few minutes before the flight takes off with slight modification or change ..... submits that the sale in the course of exports must take place only after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of india meaning thereby vessel or aircraft must leave customs area towards its onward journey to a foreign destination. he submits that the judgment referred to by the petitioners in the case of minerals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2016 (HC)

Namrata Singh and Others Vs. Director General Civil Aviation (DGCA) an ...

Court : Delhi

..... in rule 17 of the second schedule. 11.9 on 28.05.1999, the montreal convention was signed which, led to amendments being made in the 1972 act, with the enactment of the carriage by air (amendment) act, 2009. this enactment received the assent of the president, on 20.03.2009 and was brought into force, on 01.07 ..... in short the committee). the committee, inter alia, held vide its report that: "....the probable cause of the accident could be attributed to the departure of the aircraft from controlled flight due to an external weather related phenomenon, mishandling of controls, spatial disorientation or a combination of the three....". 4.6 this apart there were recommendations ..... by respondent no.3, which was accepted by uicl. reliance in this behalf was placed on the judgement of the national consumer disputes redressal commission dated 19.03.2007, passed in original petition no. 375/1997, in the case titled: orient treasures private ltd. vs united india insurance co. ltd. 8.3 it was further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2008 (TRI)

One Stop Airline Mro Support Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC216

..... be exempt from payment of additional custom duty under section 3(1) of customs tariff act read with entry no. 54b of notfn. no. 6/2006-ce dated march 1, 2002 (as amended) notifications no. 19/2007-ce dated 7.3.2007? this question and other similar questions have been slightly recast by giving reference to section ..... contained in the preceding condition no. 101. 'operator', according to the said definition, means "a person, organization or enterprise engaged in or offering to engage in aircraft operation". thus, an operator cannot be equated to a third party importer like the applicant, the departmental representative contends. we find no substance in this contention. the ..... pool would be exempt from payment of additional customs duty under entry 54b of notification number 6/2006-ce dated march 1, 2006 (as amended)? the importation of aircraft components/spare parts for storing the same in a 'regional pool' pursuant to the contracts entered into with the airline companies in india which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1996 (HC)

Domier Luftfahrt Gmbh Vs. K.C.V. Airways

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)699; 63(1996)DLT874; 1996(39)DRJ411

..... 1996, issued in favor of sh. ashok marwaha, who had signed and instituted the plaint. the said power of attorney ratifies all acts done by the said attorney. further that an amendment application i.a. no. 5000/96 had been filed to include the averment that the plaint was being instituted by sh. ashok marwaha, ..... burdening the plaintiff with extra liability. (21) considering the above facts and circumstances, this is a fit case where interim mandatory directions for return of the aircraft to the plaintiff are called for. the plaintiff would otherwise suffer irreparable injury. the balance of convenience is also in favor of the plaintiff. in these circumstances ..... agreement. the lease provides for numerous contingencies, apart from the rental and other charges payable, the terms for maintenance, warranty, replacement of parts, return of aircraft etc are set out in detail. (6) the plaintiff's case in brief is that the defendant has been in persistent and continuous default of its obligations .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //