Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: kerala Page 3 of about 4,632 results (0.156 seconds)

Nov 18 2009 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Synthite Industrial Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Kerala

..... cit v. chemplast sanmar ltd. : (2009) 314 i.t.r. 231, which are rendered based on later amendment introduced to section 234b by finance act 2006 with effect from 1.4.2007. it is seen that corresponding amendment is made to section 234a also, so that credit available can be set off against liability to pay tax under section ..... year's assessment completed under section 115jaa against assessed tax for the purpose of determination of interest liability under section 234b and section 234c of the i.t. act. in fact, in the course of completion of assessment, the assessing officer allowed set off and worked the interest under sections 234b and c on the net ..... 140a along with return. even though amended provision which authorises set off of credit available under section 115jaa is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1962 (HC)

Sukapuram Sabhayogam Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1963Ker101

..... deals with the history of article 31a. the learned judge refers to the fact that article 31a was inserted.in the constitution by the con-stitution (first amendment) act, 1951 with retrospective effect and, therefore, it must be deemed to have been in the constitution from the very beginning, namely, 26th january 1950. the ..... learned judge also traces the further amendment to. the said article by the constitution (fourth amend-ment) act, 1955, which also was made retrospective. by the constitution (fourth amendment) act, 1955, the expressions 'in the states of madras and travancore-cochin, any jenmom right' were ..... introduced in article 31a clause (2) (a). by the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956, in sub-clause (a) of clause (2) of article 31a, the word 'kerala' was substituted for travancore-cochin. therefore, article 31a(2)( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 1977 (HC)

Sivadasa Menon Vs. Sunna Sahib

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1977Ker187

..... lok sabha in view of article 102(1)(a) of the constitution. that article was amended by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976. but the notification issued by the central government under section 2 of the above act does not include section 19 of that act amending article 102 of the constitution. so both sides agree that the question has to be decided ..... the basis of each of these positions.6. according to the petitioner the 1st respondent was appointed as official receiver under section 59 of the kerala insolvency act, act 2 of 1956 as amended by act 18 of 1957 as per g. o. rt. 2359/ 76/home dated 14-10-1976 and that the 1st respondent was holding that office when ..... the 1st respondent is disqualified in view of article 102 of the constitution. the 1st respondent was appointed as official receiver under section 59 of the kerala insolvency act, act 2 of 1956 as amended by act 18 of 1957, by the government of kerals on 23-8-1976 as per g. o. rt. 2359/ 76/home dated 14-10-1976, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2005 (HC)

Bhaskaran Vs. Sub Registrar

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2005Ker278; [2006]132CompCas183(Ker); 2005(3)KLT150

..... 5% up to rs. 10 lakhs, 5% up to rs. 10 million and 0.05% if it exceeded rs. 10 million. by the kerala court fees and suits valuation amendment act 2 of 2003, the rate of court fee was enhanced. the rate has an ascending and descending trend depending the amount involved. in the kerala revenue recovery rules, 1968, there ..... is provided taking into account the quantum of the amount due. under the kerala court fees and suits valuation act, advalorem fee is provided under article 1 of schedule 1. before the commencement of the kerala court fees and suits valuation amendment act 2 of 2003, 2% was provided as court fee up to rs. 15,000/-, 5% up to rs ..... 'collection charges' was added by the notification referred to above. rule 5 as it stood before the amendment was as follows:'5.(1)col lection charges at the rate of 5 percent of the arrears collected under the provisions of the act on behalf of any institution notified under section 71 shall be realised from such institutions.(2) the collection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2004 (HC)

Reeta George Vs. Special Tahsildar

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(1)KLT79

pius c. kuriakose, j.1. the grievance of the petitioner whose properties were acquired under the land acquisition act for the purpose of kerala water authority is that ext.p6 application for reference under s.i 8 though filed within seven days of his coming to know about the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1997 (HC)

V.V. Samuel and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1998Ker83; [1998]94CompCas283(Ker)

..... managing committeeof the society consisted of five elected members from the general body and six official members.2. by kerala co-operative societies amendment act, 1987 (act 19/1987), section 31 was amended whereby nomination of official members to the managing committee of an ordinary co-operative society was not made compulsory. thereafter, the managing ..... , other than an apex or a central society, at the commencement of the kerala co-operative societies (amendment) act, 1987, shall cease to hold such office at such commencement.' 6. under section 28 of the act, the generalbody of a society shall constitute a committee, for a period not exceeding three years, in ..... laws were originally framed, unamended provisions were applicable. since the interpretation of the judgment of a learned single judge and effect of amendment of sections 28 and 31 of the act are involved in the matter, thelearned single judge was of the opinion that there should be an authoritative decision by a division .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2009 (HC)

Vinija Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4555

..... in such cases, proceedings are not normally initiated against offenders on complaints of individuals but on the basis of seizures effected by police officers. that explains the amendment/modification in the definition of known goonda in section 2(o). the fact of seizure of specified articles by the police officer in the presence of witnesses were, ..... chosen not to eliminate police witnesses from the proviso though complaints by police officers have been eliminated in the body of the section. this is a conscious legislative act. the same may not be undone by interpretation. when the language is plain, nothing may be added or taken away from the plain language employed by the ..... .7. the learned additional director general of prosecutions contends that the seizures have been effected in the presence of the witnesses and sand under the kerala sand act is the article seized in all these cases. the learned adgp contends that the language of the proviso does not at all permit this court to introduce .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1978 (HC)

Rama Varma Bharathan Thampuran Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1979Ker181

..... a new definition of 'ruler' as follows:--' 'ruler' means the prince, chief or other person who, at any time before the commencement of the constitution (twenty-sixth amendment) act, 1971, was recognised by the president as the ruler of an indian state or any person who, at any time before such commencement, was recognised by the president ..... from such commencement, cease to be recognised as such ruler or the successor of such ruler; (b) on and from the commencement of the constitution (twenty-sixth amendment) act, 1971, privy purse is abolished and all rights, liabilities and obligations in respect of privy purse are extinguished and accordingly the ruler or, as the case may be ..... any law for the time being in force.- (a) the prince, chief or other person who, at any time before the commencement of the constitution (twenty-sixth amendment) act, 1971, was recognised by the president as the ruler of an indian state or any person who, at any time before such commencement, was recognised by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2004 (HC)

Siraj Vs. High Court of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(3)KLT1

..... in connection with the affairs of the union or of a state.'15. amendments brought into articles 15, 16 and 335 of the constitution by the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, the constitution (eighty-first amendment) act, 2000, the constitution (eighty-fifth amendment) act, 2001, the constitution (seventy-nineth amendment) act, 1999 and the constitution (eighty-second amendment) act, 2000 are very relevant in these, cases.16. reservation clause contained in ..... two and a half hours.paper i code of civil procedure, limitation act,specific relief act, court fees and suitsvaluation act, kerala stamp act, keralacivil courts act and kerala small causecourts act.paper ii transfer of property act, contract act,kerala land reforms act, kerala building(lease and rent control) act, panchayat rajact, municipalities act, family courts actand revenue recovery act.paper iii criminal procedure code including framingof charges and granting bail - part a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2009 (HC)

Perinthalmanna Taluk Rural Housing Co-op. Society Vs. Unnikrishnan

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT124

..... upon the previous decision of this court in joseph v. central bank of india 1987 (2) klt 539 which had been rendered without taking note of the impact of the amendment act 104 of 1976.3. sale shall become complete only on an order confirming the sale by the court under order 21 rule 92 of the code of civil procedure. such ..... of 1976. rule 85 of order 21 as applicable to kerala in view of the substitution by the notification published in kerala gazette dated 21.12.1965, prior to the amendment act 104 of 1976, contemplated deposit of the full amount of the purchase money with the amount required for the general stamp paper for the certificate under rule 94 by the ..... with the full amount of the purchase price within 15 days from the date of the sale has no-legal force and only the rule under the amendment act after coming into force of such amendment would prevail. the view taken in the aforesaid decision was followed by this court in kunhambu v. geetha 2001 (1) klt 602 as well and the law .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //